Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-07-02 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johan Hendriks wrote:
>>
 Konrad Heuer wrote:

 On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:

> We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
> CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?

 As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when

Each new version of Samba has it's own bugs, so I prefer not to commit
0 day release versions, but wait, until it's got proven to be stable
enough.

Again, there are talks about 3.0.31 release due some new fixes... *sigh*

With regards,
Timur.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread O. Hartmann

Johan Hendriks wrote:



Konrad Heuer wrote:

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:

We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to 
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?

As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when
building 

Samba from ports.

Best regards

Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Oh, is that so ... then why isn't the version number bumped up?
Slightly 

confusing, but if the patch has been incorporated it makes me feel

better.


Kindly regards,
Oliver


Reding this on freshports makes me think it is bumped!

29 May 2008 11:47:46
3.0.28a_1,1

This is a security update of Samba 3.0.28a, that address CVE-2008-1105.

Approved by:shaun (mentor, implicit)
Security:   CVE-2008-1105

Regards,
Johan Hendriks
Double L Automatisering




Well, sorry making this noise, I looked at www.samba.org and saw version 
3.0.30 out there and checked against the port and that what smbstatus 
reveals and tried to figure out ...


Somehow it would be much easier and for the 'stupid' among us (like me) 
to bump also version number - if that would be possible and without 
implications ino too much work ...


Regards,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread Johan Hendriks


>>Konrad Heuer wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> 
>>> We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to 
>>> CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
>> 
>> As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when
building 
>> Samba from ports.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Konrad Heuer
>> GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 

>Oh, is that so ... then why isn't the version number bumped up?
Slightly 
>confusing, but if the patch has been incorporated it makes me feel
better.

>Kindly regards,
>Oliver

Reding this on freshports makes me think it is bumped!

29 May 2008 11:47:46
3.0.28a_1,1

This is a security update of Samba 3.0.28a, that address CVE-2008-1105.

Approved by:shaun (mentor, implicit)
Security:   CVE-2008-1105

Regards,
Johan Hendriks
Double L Automatisering


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread O. Hartmann

Konrad Heuer wrote:


On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:

We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to 
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?


As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building 
Samba from ports.


Best regards

Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Oh, is that so ... then why isn't the version number bumped up? Slightly 
confusing, but if the patch has been incorporated it makes me feel better.


Kindly regards,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-19 Thread Konrad Heuer


On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:

We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 
shouldn't it be R3.0.30?


As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building 
Samba from ports.


Best regards

Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"