On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:31:47 -0400
Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to be a pest, but how can I do what you suggest? My SWAP0 is a
> _partition_ on the raid0 volume , and SWAP1 is a swapfile on raid1 created
> as a Vnode; and activated in rc.conf by "swapfile="/raid1/swap1"
>
> How can
On Monday 02 October 2006 14:23, Charles Swiger wrote:
>
> Well, you might try benchmarking the system with both arrays used for
> swapping and with only the less-busy RAID array being used for
> swapping, and see which one does better.
Yes, this is what I will do; if not benchmark, at least get
On Oct 2, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Bob wrote:
On Monday 02 October 2006 09:14, Chuck Swiger wrote:
The swap system knows how to interleave data between the
additional swap
areas relatively efficiently,
Yes I discovered that. The additional swap space was instantly used
as soon as
I activated it;
On Monday 02 October 2006 09:14, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> The swap system knows how to interleave data between the additional swap
> areas relatively efficiently,
Yes I discovered that. The additional swap space was instantly used as soon as
I activated it; and the added swap improved things measu
Bob wrote:
It became obvious after a short while, that I had too little physical memory
(1GB), and I was using swap often. While swapping, things slowed down. So, I
added an additional 1GB of swap space (via swap file) on the secondary file
system. I did this as per the manual.
I now have mor
