Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread RW
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:35:51 -0700 "David Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. It's starting to make a lot more sense. > Just to confirm, then, if there's no CPUTYPE set, I can then set up > a build server on an Opteron box, for example, to build world, kernel > and por

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:35:51AM -0700, David Allen wrote: > > Avoid setting CFLAGS unless you have a good reason - Gentoo > > documentation has a lot to answer for. CPUTYPE causes "-march" to be > > applied, so it can affect compatibility. AFAIK both setting do affect > > world and kernel becaus

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:35:51AM -0700, David Allen wrote: [...] > Thank you for your reply. It's starting to make a lot more sense. > Just to confirm, then, if there's no CPUTYPE set, I can then set up > a build server on an Opteron box, for example, to build world, kernel > and ports binari

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread David Allen
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:44 AM, RW wrote: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:14:45 -0700 David Allen wrote: > > > The advice I've read in several posts on the subject involve > > everything from setting one, setting both, to ignoring both, > > sometimes with the =? notation and sometimes without. And then,

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread RW
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:14:45 -0700 "David Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The advice I've read in several posts on the subject involve > everything from setting one, setting both, to ignoring both, > sometimes with the =? notation and sometimes without. And then, I've > read comments that sugg