Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I installed another SATA drive on a FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE box here last
night. After the disk prep, I mounted it and then shared the whole drive
via Samba.
This morning when I came in, the machine had horked all over itself and
I saw this in the log after the reboot:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex de Kruijff
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:57 PM
To: Scott Sipe
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Softupdates Question
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
Hi,
At work we're running some rather old accounting software that tells
us to disable oplocks and all caheing on our file server (and our
clients)--Samba/FreeBSD isn't officially supported (the only
platforms that are are
Comrade Burnout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that I didn't create *quite* enough space in my /var
partition for accepting somewhat larger email attachments/ messages.
i thought softupdates was the way to go, but on reading the handbook
online, that's not quite what i thought it
I just noticed that I didn't create *quite* enough space in my /var
partition for accepting somewhat larger email attachments/ messages.
i thought softupdates was the way to go, but on reading the handbook
online, that's not quite what i thought it was
is there any way with 5.2.1
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I just noticed that I didn't create *quite* enough space in my /var
partition for accepting somewhat larger email attachments/ messages.
i thought softupdates was the way to go, but on reading the handbook
online, that's not quite what i thought it was
is
Bill Moran wrote:
Comrade Burnout [1][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that I didn't create *quite* enough space in my /var
partition for accepting somewhat larger email attachments/ messages.
i thought softupdates was the way to go, but on reading the handbook
online, that's not
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:12:05 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Hmmm ... not good. A little more research might qualify this problem for a PR.
I was thinking that myself :-)
- Yikes! Is the machine still responsive? Sometimes you can put the load that
- high and still have a
Hello Bill,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:53:30 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I don't know what's wrong, but does unmounting and remounting the partition
- reclaim the lost space?
Alas, I can't umount the partition, my guess is because it is unable to sync
(nothing to do with open
John Ekins wrote:
Hello Bill,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:53:30 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I don't know what's wrong, but does unmounting and remounting the partition
- reclaim the lost space?
Alas, I can't umount the partition, my guess is because it is unable to sync
(nothing to do
John Ekins wrote:
Hello,
I've a couple of questions about soft updates. I've Googled heavily on this but
not really found a satisfactory answer. The story:
I'm running on numerous FreeBSD 4.7 SMP machines as primary MX machines. The mail
is not stored on the FreeBSD machines but on NetApps via
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-21 14:52:45 -0500:
the reason that they disabled by default on / is almost
certainly because the / is usually *small*, not large.
thus spoke Terry Lambert in
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: I believe the reason it's not on in sysinstall is that
Alistair Phillips wrote:
Hi guys,
I know that in the mailing list a while ago people were wondering why
SoftUpdates were not enabled by default at install time on the / partition.
Now I installed FreeBSD 4.7 RELEASE into a 4GB slice. I did not create
seperate bits for / or /usr and such - but
On Friday 21 February 2003 08:10 am, Alistair Phillips wrote:
| Hi guys,
|
| So I enabled SoftUpdates when I was busy with FDISK at the install
| time and now it seems like it may have been a bad idea. Now I know
| 4GB is not much but it seems that there is no more space left. And
| at times
On Friday 21 February 2003 08:10 am, Alistair Phillips wrote:
| Hi guys,
|
| So I enabled SoftUpdates when I was busy with FDISK at the install
| time and now it seems like it may have been a bad idea. Now I know
| 4GB is not much but it seems that there is no more space
left. And at
John Straiton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 21 February 2003 08:10 am, Alistair Phillips wrote:
| Hi guys,
|
| So I enabled SoftUpdates when I was busy with FDISK at the install
| time and now it seems like it may have been a bad idea. Now I know
| 4GB is not much but it
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
during the process of setting up some new servers I noticed that
sysinstall will enable softupdates by default for everything BUT /.
Is there any risk if I set / to use softupdates as well?
The problem with softupdates is that a
17 matches
Mail list logo