On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:44:20PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed:
Postfix has a readable config file (with comments!) that doesn't
require compiling into the proper syntax.
Here follows a snippets from /etc/mail/freebsd.mc. It's readable and full of
comments.
A simple make will compile the
Ruben == Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org writes:
Ruben And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased.
I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering
postfix. And now I use postfix, and you can't *make* me use sendmail
again.
Of course I'm biased. I prefer postfix
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
mer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
Ruben == Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org writes:
Ruben And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased.
I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering
postfix. And now I use postfix, and
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:30:21AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed:
Ruben == Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org writes:
Ruben And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased.
I had at least a decade of experience with sendmail before discovering
postfix. And now I use postfix, and you can't
Ruben == Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org writes:
Ruben I'm not making you use anything. Just commenting on your assessment that
Ruben sendmail cannot do something, while I know it can.
I never said it couldn't. So let's not be making something up here.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:30:21AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz typed:
Ruben == Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org writes:
Ruben And sendmail does not? You obviously are biased.
I had at least a decade of experience with
Anyway, my point is that an Operating System should not impose a
specific MTA by default, and let the installer chose their favorite
MTA. From what I understand you can't even remove Sendmail from
standard FBSD and must only be de-activated. I personally think that
sucks (if it's true
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com articulated:
As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by
default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some
limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm glad that is sendmail the choice of
FreeBSD.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com articulated:
As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by
default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some
On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com articulated:
As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by
default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some
limitations vs. Sendmail, I'm
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:51:01 -0600
Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com articulated:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com articulated:
As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by
On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:51:01 -0600
Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com articulated:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com articulated:
As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a
: Mon Mar 22 18:09:15 2010
Subject: Re: Spamassasin, sendmail, Postfix
On Mar 22, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:51:01 -0600
Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com articulated:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:00:17 -0430
Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com articulated:
As I see it, FreeBSD is, in fact, a DNS server or a mail server by
default, between others and if I want. And since Postfix has some
Jorge == Jorge Biquez jbiq...@icsmx.com writes:
Jorge I said that I am not sure but that even spamassin could be configured
Jorge to run under send mail or if that does not work that to move from
Jorge sendmail to another could be the solution and not so difficult, like
Jorge postfix. Am I
I said that I am not sure but that even
spamassin could be configured to run under send mail or if that does
not work that to move from sendmail to another could be the solution
and not so difficult, like postfix.
Of course it can.
In the ports you have a thing called spammilter? that is
I installed that spammilter, run without problems. Thanks
Just curios I have a client that has a dedicated server using CPanel.
I am just curios that they are using Exim as the MTA . I imagine that
has an an advantage for using under CPanel.
Thanks for you time
At 06:05 p.m.
Just curios I have a client that has a dedicated server using CPanel.
I am just curios that they are using Exim as the MTA . I imagine that
has an an advantage for using under CPanel.
I never laid my hand on any Exim server, I don't even know what CPanel
is. If it's a kind of GUI for Exim, I
Hello.
CPANEL is an interface , graphical, pro administering services
(jailed usually) in servers. That way users can do almost anything
with is virtual server. It is kind of popular and for what I have used is good.
You open another question I was going to ask in the list. If all of
you
I am deciding for a good text editor (suggestions?
Your opening the pandora box of flame war :)
Emacs with no doubt, because I have been using it for over 20 years,
over 3 major operating systems (Multics, DOS/Windows, all possible
Unix and the like). So yes, I feel very at ease with Emacs and
20 matches
Mail list logo
