On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:52:58AM -0700, Chris wrote:
Is there any shortfall in performance or reliability to running
production with swap equal in size to the 8gb of system memory? I
doesn't matter much. But, if you run enough to act
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:52:58AM -0700, Chris wrote:
> As a standard practice, I've always configured swap file to be double
> the size of real ram split across system and data disk. For example,
> 8gb on da0 and 8gb on da1 if the system has 8g real ram. In practice,
> In 7 or 8 years, I'v
On Friday 29 September 2006 11:52, Chris wrote:
> As a standard practice, I've always configured swap file to be double
> the size of real ram split across system and data disk. For example,
> 8gb on da0 and 8gb on da1 if the system has 8g real ram. In practice,
> In 7 or 8 years, I've never seen s
