[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
>
> I'll probably be upgrading to 7.0 in the next month or so, given that
> this is obviously a thread issue and that that release has much
> improved thread code. However, for the time being, the pressing issue
> is fixed, and for anyone in my position stuck on 6.
> I will, probably as part of upgrading to 7.0 (which I may accelerate, given
> this point). I'm just ecstatic at the difference I'm already seeing, and
> specifically wanted to make note of it in the archives. Point very much
> taken, though. :-)
It's trivial to change to libthr, as pointed out e
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michel Talon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Yep, it could be that -- wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michel Talon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Yep, it could be that -- what confuses me though is that it is
claimed
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michel Talon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Yep, it could be that -- what confuses me though is that it is
claimed that performance suddenly
