On 2006-09-10 18:04, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor
> > > status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is o
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 06:04:04PM -0400, stan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor
> > > status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 07:57:52PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 10), stan said:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor
>
In the last episode (Sep 10), stan said:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor
> > > status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is on Linux?
> >
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor
> > status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is on Linux?
>
> Open source started with the concept of individ
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor
> status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is on Linux?
Open source started with the concept of individuals hacking the source
code to get the features they want. The comm
