Re: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ?
On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:03, Frank Bonnet wrote: My server (mailhub) has two gigaethernet interfaces and I would like to use both of them with ONE IP Address to speed up LAN accesses. Why do you think that the network is the bottleneck in your setup? Do you have a system that can process - in some way - 1Gb of email per second? Nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ?
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Why do you think that the network is the bottleneck in your setup? Do you have a system that can process - in some way - 1Gb of email per second? That is not ONLY smtp traffic we extensively use IMAP and there are currently 400/500 IMAP processes on the machine , this protocol is a pretty bandwidth cruncher the machine support also POP3 + WEBMAIL traffic so ... the more it will have bandwidth, better will be the email service given to my users. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ?
On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:32, Frank Bonnet wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Why do you think that the network is the bottleneck in your setup? Do you have a system that can process - in some way - 1Gb of email per second? That is not ONLY smtp traffic we extensively use IMAP and there are currently 400/500 IMAP processes on the machine , this protocol is a pretty bandwidth cruncher the machine support also POP3 + WEBMAIL traffic so ... the more it will have bandwidth, better will be the email service given to my users. You say that your servers (whatever that is IMAP, SMTP, POP3, web) running on an one and only computer are pushing down the wire over 1Gbps? What's your current bandwidth utilization? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ?
On 3/8/07, Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:32, Frank Bonnet wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Why do you think that the network is the bottleneck in your setup? Do you have a system that can process - in some way - 1Gb of email per second? That is not ONLY smtp traffic we extensively use IMAP and there are currently 400/500 IMAP processes on the machine , this protocol is a pretty bandwidth cruncher the machine support also POP3 + WEBMAIL traffic so ... the more it will have bandwidth, better will be the email service given to my users. You say that your servers (whatever that is IMAP, SMTP, POP3, web) running on an one and only computer are pushing down the wire over 1Gbps? What's your current bandwidth utilization? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The freebsd port channeling support (I think it's called trunk in openbsd) is very limited. You have ng_one2many which let you aggregate two interfaces using round robin loadbalancing and ng_fec with uses fast ethernet channel. There isn't any LACP support yet :| What hardware do you use to push 1gbps on a mail server? Cheers -- Alexandre Vieira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ?
If you want to put a freebsd/openbsd router in front of multiple machines we've seen some success in the past using pf + carp. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexandre Vieira Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:56 AM To: Nikos Vassiliadis; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Two ethernet one IP load balancing ? On 3/8/07, Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:32, Frank Bonnet wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Why do you think that the network is the bottleneck in your setup? Do you have a system that can process - in some way - 1Gb of email per second? That is not ONLY smtp traffic we extensively use IMAP and there are currently 400/500 IMAP processes on the machine , this protocol is a pretty bandwidth cruncher the machine support also POP3 + WEBMAIL traffic so ... the more it will have bandwidth, better will be the email service given to my users. You say that your servers (whatever that is IMAP, SMTP, POP3, web) running on an one and only computer are pushing down the wire over 1Gbps? What's your current bandwidth utilization? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The freebsd port channeling support (I think it's called trunk in openbsd) is very limited. You have ng_one2many which let you aggregate two interfaces using round robin loadbalancing and ng_fec with uses fast ethernet channel. There isn't any LACP support yet :| What hardware do you use to push 1gbps on a mail server? Cheers -- Alexandre Vieira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
