Jud wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 20:04:39 -0400, Robert H. Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Unless there is a specific reason not to do so, cvsup and make world would
seem to be an easier and altogether better way to go for an upgrade from
one minor version number to the next. Many
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:21:13 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Jud wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 20:04:39 -0400, Robert H. Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Unless there is a specific reason not to do so, cvsup and make world would
seem to be an easier and altogether
Jud wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:21:13 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Jud wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 20:04:39 -0400, Robert H. Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Unless there is a specific reason not to do so, cvsup and make world
would seem to be an easier
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 20:04:39 -0400 Robert H. Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably
wrote:
Hello,
I'm making plans to upgrade from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE. My
previous attempt was a binary upgrade from 4.5 to 4.7 which did not go
very well. I eventually purchased the 4.7 CD.
The
Hello,
I'm making plans to upgrade from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE. My
previous attempt was a binary upgrade from 4.5 to 4.7 which did not go
very well. I eventually purchased the 4.7 CD.
The FreeBSD Handbook stresses backing up the system and implies that
/dump/ is a better backup