Ive been there, you wount get very far XEN FreeBSD isnt quite there yet,
itll boot but doing much else wth it, ie compiling things is highly
questionable, hit or miss at best but they are working on it time will
tell
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile) <
[EMAIL PROTECT
> Sorry, I meant virtualized as in a guest os under Xen.
>
I need to experiment with FreeBSD as a DomU guest under a Xen hypervisor
-- and it looks like NetBSD/amd64 is the only quality platform for Dom0
(function Xen DOM0, iSCSI, SMP, IPv6, VLANs, briding, pf(4), mfi(4),
PowerEdge 9th gen supp
At 02:41 AM 3/15/2008, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:08:02 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's
> > but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized.
> > Given a choice, I wou
At 01:08 AM 3/15/2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's
but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is
virtualized. Given a choice, I would rather use FreeBSD because of
the ease of use of keeping the ports current.
I am just won
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:08:02 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's
> > but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized.
> > Given a choice, I would rather use FreeBSD because of the ease of
> >
I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's but need
to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized. Given a choice, I
would rather use FreeBSD because of the ease of use of keeping the ports
current.
I am just wondering if anyone has used the virtualized FreeB
