Am 11.08.2012 09:58, schrieb Ian Smith:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 427, Issue 6, Message: 16
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:39:36 +0200 Christoph P.U. Kukulies
k...@kukulies.org wrote:
Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies:
Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U.
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 427, Issue 6, Message: 16
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:39:36 +0200 Christoph P.U. Kukulies
k...@kukulies.org wrote:
Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies:
Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies:
The problem need not to be confined to
Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies:
The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop under
5.1 already.
read: started to develop...
I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange
behaviour such that the
outside interface (ed0, BNC connector)
Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies:
Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies:
The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop
under 5.1 already.
read: started to develop...
I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange
Στις Monday 18 May 2009 22:07:24 ο/η Miroslav Lachman έγραψε:
Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
Hello,
I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server.
today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk
ad4.
The messages were:
May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING -
Στις Monday 18 May 2009 13:27:58 ο/η Manolis Kiagias έγραψε:
It looks to me you got a bad disk now.
Manoli, thanx
i replaced the bad disk and the system looks ok, rebulding gm0.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
Hello,
in advance sorry for the cross posting, it is just that freebsd-geom didnt
seem that populated.
I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server.
today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk
ad4.
The messages were:
May 18 08:02:02
Hey Manoli! glad to see you again,
Στις Monday 18 May 2009 13:27:58 ο/η Manolis Kiagias έγραψε:
Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
Hello,
in advance sorry for the cross posting, it is just that freebsd-geom didnt
seem that populated.
I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server.
today morning after
panix panix wrote:
Hello,
in advance sorry for the cross posting, it is just that freebsd-geom didnt
seem that populated.
I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server.
today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk
ad4.
The messages were:
May 18 08:02:02 panix
Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
Hello,
I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server.
today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk ad4.
The messages were:
May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error
(retrying request) LBA=268091264
May 18 08:02:08
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:17:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 17:49:08 -0600 Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
I just uninstalled Firefox v. 2.0.0.20 and then installed firefox v. 3.0.5.
Which shows one firefox binary; firefox3. Yet, when I
--On Wednesday, February 11, 2009 14:34:07 -0600 Chad Perrin
per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:17:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 17:49:08 -0600 Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
I just uninstalled Firefox v. 2.0.0.20 and then
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 17:49:08 -0600 Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
I just uninstalled Firefox v. 2.0.0.20 and then installed firefox v. 3.0.5.
Which shows one firefox binary; firefox3. Yet, when I start firefox and click
on Help/About, it shows I'm running 2.0.0.20.
--On September 19, 2006 5:25:23 PM -0400 Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it.
ehci.c v 1.42:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/usb/ehci.c?rev=1.42co
ntent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
Put this version in place in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb, comment out line 766
and rebuild your
In response to Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm setting up a new server (Dell 1950) that has a DRAC card. My home
network (where I'm working on it in my spare time) is behind a wireless
router, and the internal network is 192.168.2.0/24. The DRAC card's IP
address is 192.168.2.120
--On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 13:54:45 -0400 Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This makes no sense to me. If anyone has a bright ideas what I'm
missing, I'm all ears.
These sound like network routing problems.
Of course, but it makes no sense. All the hosts are having no problems
In response to Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One other thing. Using the console redirection through the web interface
(which forces you to use IE and an ActiveX control!), I can see the console
fine, but the keyboard and mouse (on the Windows box) don't do anything. I
can still login
You need tcp port 20 as well (ftp-data)
--
Chris.
I love deadlines. I especially love the whooshing sound they make as they
fly by... - Douglas Adams, 'Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy'
- Original Message -
From: Clement Twine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 08:05, Clement Twine wrote:
hi freebsd users,
i have a problem with users accessing my ftp service from the
internet. everything was working well until i changed from
Linux/shorewall to freebsd/ipfw as my firewall.
my setup is briefly as follows:
FTP_Server
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 09:05 +0200, Clement Twine wrote:
hi freebsd users,
i have a problem with users accessing my ftp service from the
internet. everything was working well until i changed from
Linux/shorewall to freebsd/ipfw as my firewall.
my setup is briefly as follows:
FTP_Server
i have a problem with users accessing my ftp service from the
internet. everything was working well until i changed from
Linux/shorewall to freebsd/ipfw as my firewall.
my setup is briefly as follows:
FTP_Server (10.0.0.1) --- Firewall (IPFW) - INTERNET
The linux rules were just two (and were
Chris Knipe wrote:
You need tcp port 20 as well (ftp-data)
so, should the following work?
ipfw add 00010 allow tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 21
ipfw add 00011 allow tcp from 10.0.0.1 21 to any
ipfw add 00012 allow tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 20
ipfw add 00013 allow tcp from 10.0.0.1 20
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 08:58, Clement Twine wrote:
i have a problem with users accessing my ftp service from the
internet. everything was working well until i changed from
Linux/shorewall to freebsd/ipfw as my firewall.
my setup is briefly as follows:
FTP_Server (10.0.0.1) --- Firewall
Clement Twine wrote:
so, should the following work?
ipfw add 00010 allow tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 21
ipfw add 00011 allow tcp from 10.0.0.1 21 to any
ipfw add 00012 allow tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 20
ipfw add 00013 allow tcp from 10.0.0.1 20 to any
This last ruleset will
hi Robert,
Robert Slade wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 08:58, Clement Twine wrote:
i have a problem with users accessing my ftp service from the
internet. everything was working well until i changed from
Linux/shorewall to freebsd/ipfw as my firewall.
my setup is briefly as follows:
FTP_Server
Run the DOS configuration program 3c5x9cfg.exe and look at how the
card is setup. Like many ISA cards the 3c509 has an eeprom instead
of jumpers that you move around on the card.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nikolas Britton
Sent:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, John Von Essen wrote:
After upgrading to 4.10-STABLE I have noticed some weird issues with email.
My remote clients are unable to connect to the mail server, even though they
can access websites on it. Since they arent even getting to the server, the
logs show nothing. At
Please don't top-post.
Peter Elsner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, that's my next attempt. I don't have NAT running right now,
but didn't think it was required unless I have the firewall enabled.
I usually enable that after I get everything else up and running.
NAT has nothing to do with
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:08:55PM -0700, mike bueide wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:26:02PM -0600, Peter Elsner wrote:
Thanks, that's my next attempt. I don't have NAT running right now,
but didn't think it was required unless I have the firewall enabled.
I usually enable that after I
Peter Elsner wrote:
Okay, I have a really weird problem.
Running FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE (just installed it from CD).
It's a basic gateway setup with 2 NIC cards.
I've done this set up a hundred times and have never seen this before.
DSL modem (with static IP address) goes into one NIC card (dc0).
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:13:37 -0600
Peter Elsner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I have a really weird problem.
Running FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE (just installed it from CD).
It's a basic gateway setup with 2 NIC cards.
I've done this set up a hundred times and have never seen this before.
DSL
Kevin,
Yes, gateway_enable=YES is in my rc.conf file.
That's the first thing I checked :)
Here is my rc.conf file...
defaultrouter=??.??.??.??## Note: I do have a valid IP here...
gateway_enable=YES
hostname=gateway.gh.com
ifconfig_dc0=inet ??.??.??.?? netmask 255.255.255.248
Thanks, that's my next attempt. I don't have NAT running right now,
but didn't think it was required unless I have the firewall enabled.
I usually enable that after I get everything else up and running.
At 03:21 PM 11/19/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:13:37 -0600
Peter Elsner [EMAIL
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:26:02PM -0600, Peter Elsner wrote:
Thanks, that's my next attempt. I don't have NAT running right now,
but didn't think it was required unless I have the firewall enabled.
I usually enable that after I get everything else up and running.
Unless nat is running how
34 matches
Mail list logo
