Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are using several squid machines (6 machines, each have all others
as a siblings) for transparent caching/proxying using gre tunnel and
wccp2 (with Cisco router). Can varnish work in such situation?
Probably not; Varnish is a reverse proxy.
DES
--
--- JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:54:36 N. Harrington wrote:
Hello
I feel stupid, but I am confused about kern.maxdsiz (or datasize via
limits command) on FreeBSD amd64.
I have seen many posts and suggestions to raise it to 1G. However it seems
this
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the
available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5
or 3GB.
Better yet, don't run Squid at all. It was designed for a computer
architecture that was already obsolete
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the
available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5
or 3GB.
Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
Ok, then what do you recommend
You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the
available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5
or 3GB.
Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid?
Varnish.
http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/
--
Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid?
That depends on what you use it for...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid?
That depends on what you use it for...
What the options for forward proxy/cache with user authentication and
On 8/22/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid?
That depends on what you use it for...
What the options for
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:54:36 N. Harrington wrote:
Hello
I feel stupid, but I am confused about kern.maxdsiz (or datasize via
limits command) on FreeBSD amd64.
I have seen many posts and suggestions to raise it to 1G. However it seems
this only applies to i386. By default, on servers
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 08:32:05 Claus Guttesen wrote:
You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the
available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5
or 3GB.
Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
Ok, then what do you recommend
On Aug 22, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should configure squid to use no more than about 60 - 70% of the
available physical RAM-- ie, set the cache_mem parameter to about 2.5
or 3GB.
Better yet, don't run Squid at all. It was
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better yet, don't run Squid at all.
Ok, then what do you recommend instead of Squid?
That depends on what you use it for...
DES
We are using several squid
On Aug 21, 2007, at 4:54 PM, N. Harrington wrote:
I have seen many posts and suggestions to raise it to 1G. However
it seems this only applies to
i386. By default, on servers I have with 4G of physical memory, and
2X that of swap, I am showing
a reported datasize limit of 33554432KB. far in
13 matches
Mail list logo
