On 28/02/2012 05:43, shanib.k.k wrote:
Hi am a Ruby on rails developer. I have done a project in ROR and
currently its hosted in Ubuntu.Now the requires it to be changed to
FreeBSD. As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about
how can configure or install it.
The best place
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0530, shanib.k.k wrote:
As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about
how can configure or install it.
The basic documentation on how to install and configure
the system can be found in The FreeBSD Handbook and the
FAQ available from the main web
The address 192.168.0.11 must be assigned to a interface in the host FreeBSD.
You can do it before starting the jail, or when the jail is being started.
To assign the address before starting the jail do somthing like this:
# ifconfig lnc0 alias 192.168.0.11/24
where lnc0 is the name of nic in
Laszlo Nagy gand...@shopzeus.com writes:
I do not want to expose my jail's private IP address to the
internet.
Use loopback interface and 127.x.x.x address.
--
WBR, bsam
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I really think that it should be corrected to:
cd /usr/src
make distribution DESTDIR=$D
That's almost certainly correct, but it notes:
Notes
[1] This step is not required on FreeBSD 6.0 and later.
But then I get this error in syslog:
bind: Can't assign requested address
That's a
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:09:32AM +0100, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
Great. Here is what I did:
sorb# mkdir -p /usr/jails/vm1
sorb# cd /usr/src
sorb# setenv D /usr/jails/vm1
sorb# make installworld DESTDIR=$D
sorb# make distribution DESTDIR=$D
sorb# cat /etc/rc.conf
jail_enable=YES
Laszlo Nagy gand...@shopzeus.com writes:
I'm experimenting with jails. I have installed a 7.2 stable FreeBSD
inside vmware. Then I have created two jails, using the method written
in the handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-build.html
The only thing
No, I think you added the '/' before 'etc', which isn't in the web page.
Gotcha.
Is the problem perhaps in your /etc/rc.d/vm1 script?
Normally you would use /etc/rc.d/jail.
Yes, I'm. Sorry - it was a typo. I used this:
/etc/rc.d/jail start vm1
Are those addresses already assigned
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:41:14PM +0430, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
My computer is a windows machine, with address 192.168.0.X
Then the FreeBSD host is actually a guest os running in wvmare. It has
address 192.168.37.133
And finally, the vm1 jail should have 192.168.0.11
I don't know why
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:51:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
i could do this kwik and dirty, and type in/fix any anomalies later, but
it would be nice to know.
I've already tried
1, /CENTER d
and a other such. zip.
% sed -e 1,/CENTER/d junk.in junk.out
--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:09:46PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:51:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
i could do this kwik and dirty, and type in/fix any anomalies later, but
it would be nice to know.
I've already tried
1, /CENTER d
and a other such. zip.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:32:57PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:09:46PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:51:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
I've already tried
1, /CENTER d
and a other such. zip.
% sed -e 1,/CENTER/d junk.in
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:09:46PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:51:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
i could do this kwik and dirty, and type in/fix any anomalies later, but
it would be nice to know.
I've already tried
1, /CENTER d
and a other such. zip.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:32:57PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:09:46PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:51:28PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
I've already tried
1, /CENTER d
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:47:17AM -0400, Connie Webb wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
I forgot one more important thing.
Subscribe to this list -- FreeBSD-questions and probably at least
FreeBSD-announce and maybe FreeBSD-newbies and read through all
the discussions. Some
Connie, I'm beginner, too.
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:47 -0400, Connie Webb wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
I guess you need first to have a look at Documentation's section on
FreeBSD WWW site. Here is the link: http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html
In my case, actually I need to
Connie Webb wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
What are your specific goals?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On Friday 12 October 2007 17:47:17 Connie Webb wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/getting-started.html
Connie Webb
Montgomery County Courts
Helpdesk Specialist
:D
--
Mel
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:47:17 -0400
Connie Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
No problems. what would you like to do? :)
silliness aside, if u mean 'being with freebsd', you should start with the
Handbook, which you can find online @ freebsd.org, under
Hello,
On 10/12/07, Connie Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
It is not clear from your email what do you want to do and what you
have done up to know. If you do not have FreeBSD already installed you
can start from Installing FreeBSD chapter in the
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:47:17AM -0400, Connie Webb wrote:
Please help as I don't know where to begin.
Presuming what you want to begin is learning and using FreeBSD,
the first thing is to start studying the extensive documentation
that is available. See:
The open ports are simply port-forwarded from the router to my
internal network (NAT). And I only have one public IP.
For me the more important issue is whether DNS would work with private
IP addresses.
On 7/5/06, David Stanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/06, Michael S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes DNS will work with your port forwarding assuming you have it set up
correctly on your router.
Are you trying to be the authoritative DNS for your domain? If you are you
will still need a secondary DNS.
-Derek
At 05:56 AM 7/6/2006, Michael S wrote:
The open ports are simply
Derek,
Actually my domain is a subdomain (e.g. mysubdomain.domain.com), and
obviously the domain server for domain.com points correctly to my
site.
What I want to have (mostly for the sake of configuring DNS) is
something like www.mysubdomain.domain.com, and
ftp.mysubdomain.domain.com.
Can my
You need a second IP for the secondary server. With a single public IP and
port forwarding, you get only one destination.
All you need is to add entries to DNS maps for the other host records you
want. I assume your DNS is being hosted elseware now, so just have them
add the two additional
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:06:39PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
Hi all.
I am trying to set up a DNS service. I have 2 FreeBSD machines, one's
web and DNS (that I am setting up) and the other FTP. Both machines
are behind a router and get local addresses (i.e. 192.168). If
DNS, FTP and web
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:30:16AM +1200, I wrote:
[ some totally irrelevant stuff ]
Please disregard my last post. I must learn to read before answering.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No problem. Thanks anyway.
On 7/6/06, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:30:16AM +1200, I wrote:
[ some totally irrelevant stuff ]
Please disregard my last post. I must learn to read before answering.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael,
I am trying to set up a DNS service. I have 2 FreeBSD machines, one's
web and DNS (that I am setting up) and the other FTP. Both machines
are behind a router and get local addresses (i.e. 192.168). If
DNS, FTP and web ports in the router are open, will I be able to set
up the
On 7/5/06, Michael S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I am trying to set up a DNS service. I have 2 FreeBSD machines, one's
web and DNS (that I am setting up) and the other FTP. Both machines
are behind a router and get local addresses (i.e. 192.168). If
DNS, FTP and web ports in the
I have used a single 256MB mfs on FreeBSD for months without any problem.
I was not doing heavy IO on it, it was used in a /tmp fashion and most of the
time was swapped out, going down to 8MB resident size at times.
softdeps in NetBSD is very buggy. putting very high load like deleting
huge
I have used a single 256MB mfs on FreeBSD for months without any problem.
I was not doing heavy IO on it, it was used in a /tmp fashion and most of the
time was swapped out, going down to 8MB resident size at times.
does FreeBSD deallocate pages that are unused.
NetBSD does not. if you create
does FreeBSD deallocate pages that are unused.
NetBSD does not. if you create 100MB file on mfs and delete it, VM size of
mfs is still over 100MB. while it will get swapped out it's a kind of
nonsense IMHO
FreeBSD tries to swap out idle pages. That means that you'll have more
physical memory
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
my questions:
Start here :
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick performance tests, and at least in
disk I/O and fair scheduling it's MUCH better (tested 4.10 and 5.1).
It's nice to be welcomed by higher performance when you switch OSes. :-)
my questions:
1) what is Buf and Cache in top exactly? why
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i want to go to FreeBSD instead of NetBSD on my i386 machines because of
all new features :( introduced in NetBSD after 1.5 mostly crashing
softdeps, strange memory/unified disk cache management (large writing to
file almost
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wojciech Puchar
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD beginner (NetBSD advanced)
[snip]
my questions:
1) what is Buf and Cache in top exactly? why buf on 96MB
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i want to go to FreeBSD instead of NetBSD on my i386 machines because of
all new features :( introduced in NetBSD after 1.5 mostly crashing
softdeps, strange memory/unified disk cache management (large writing
2) can i compile kernel with -march=pentium,pentium[234] -O2
optimization? in NetBSD 2.0 doing -march=pentium produces
kernel that doesn't boot at all, just resets.
2.0 is always under develpoment and not yet released. I don't see the
problem with 1.6.2.
4) is IPv6 working well? (i mean no
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick performance tests, and at least in
disk I/O and fair scheduling it's MUCH better (tested 4.10 and 5.1).
It's nice to be welcomed by higher performance when you switch OSes. :-)
while high performance is always cool, stable performance
40 matches
Mail list logo