Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
are you using 7-branch? in my 7.1 system there is same problem. top shows often nonsense in CPU usage of a process, but totals are OK. you even gave an example - bzip2 can't use 0% CPU running - more close to 100% :) as long as everything goes fine 100% CPU load is OK. if it's mostly

Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 12/16/08, KES kes-...@yandex.ru wrote: Здравствуйте, Questions. My system is overloaded, I run top to figure out which precess take time. In both cases CPU/WCPU I do not see which process take all the time. Which process take all processor time?? last pid: 24535; load averages: 3.86,

Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:31:35 Wojciech Puchar wrote: are you using 7-branch? in my 7.1 system there is same problem. top shows often nonsense in CPU usage of a process, but totals are OK. there's 4.3% system, so use top -S to show system processes. you even gave an example - bzip2

Re: ambigious 'top' results

2008-12-16 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 16:25:45 KES wrote: === 4405 prcfr 1999 cpu0: time 34 dtbuf 6486 totfr Time counter. It it supposed to generate kern.clockrate interrupts per CPU. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and