Re: burncd args

2004-03-12 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Danny Pansters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 12 March 2004 02:52, you wrote: > > lee slaughter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Danny Pansters wrote: > > > >On Friday 12 March 2004 00:04, lee slaughter wrote: > > > >>hi. > > > >>i make a tar.gz backup file. > > > >>isburncd -f

Re: burncd args

2004-03-11 Thread Danny Pansters
On Friday 12 March 2004 02:52, you wrote: > lee slaughter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Danny Pansters wrote: > > >On Friday 12 March 2004 00:04, lee slaughter wrote: > > >>hi. > > >>i make a tar.gz backup file. > > >>isburncd -f /dev/acd1 datafixate > > >>the right syntax? is "data

Re: burncd args

2004-03-11 Thread Lowell Gilbert
lee slaughter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Danny Pansters wrote: > > >On Friday 12 March 2004 00:04, lee slaughter wrote: > > > >>hi. > >>i make a tar.gz backup file. > >>isburncd -f /dev/acd1 datafixate > >>the right syntax? is "data" the correct type? i cannot tell > >>from burn

Re: burncd args

2004-03-11 Thread lee slaughter
Danny Pansters wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 00:04, lee slaughter wrote: hi. i make a tar.gz backup file. isburncd -f /dev/acd1 datafixate the right syntax? is "data" the correct type? i cannot tell from burncd manpage. What you called should be the ISO (top of my head, I

Re: burncd args

2004-03-11 Thread Danny Pansters
On Friday 12 March 2004 00:04, lee slaughter wrote: > hi. > i make a tar.gz backup file. > isburncd -f /dev/acd1 datafixate > the right syntax? is "data" the correct type? i cannot tell > from burncd manpage. What you called should be the ISO (top of my head, I think the only exce