RE: Bus error: 10 (core dumped) on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-03-16 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vladimir Ch.
 Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:51 AM
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Bus error: 10 (core dumped) on FreeBSD 7.0


 After upgrading to FreeBSD 7.0 some of the programs stopped working: when
 trying to launch emacs or sbcl I am getting Bus error: 10.
 Searching the internet revealed that this could be hardware problem - but
 6.2, 6.3 ran the same box before without any errors. Windows XP also works
 on the same computer.
 I use GENERIC kernel.

Did you recompile every program on your system after you upgraded to
7.0 or did you just assume that the 6.3 binaries would run unmodified?

See:

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html

...Updating Existing Systems
An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes a major
version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update an older system
you should reinstall any ports you have installed on the machine. This will
avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent sets of libraries when future
port upgrades rebuild one port but not others that link to it. This can be
done with:

# portupgrade -faP

after updating your system. Note some of the tools to help with this or the
instructions below for FreeBSD Update are not installed by default (e.g.
portupgrade, gpg, or similar tools like portmaster...

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bus error: 10 (core dumped) on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-03-16 Thread Derek Ragona

At 03:51 AM 3/16/2008, Vladimir Ch. wrote:

After upgrading to FreeBSD 7.0 some of the programs stopped working: when
trying to launch emacs or sbcl I am getting Bus error: 10.
Searching the internet revealed that this could be hardware problem - but
6.2, 6.3 ran the same box before without any errors. Windows XP also works
on the same computer.
I use GENERIC kernel.


You need to rebuild your ports if you have not done so.  You will need to 
also rebuild any libraries the ports depend on as well.


-Derek

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bus error (core dumped)

2006-11-07 Thread RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN



Hello all i am tring to get apache13_modssl this on FreeeBSD ver 4.11 stable to 
work. apachectl start works ok but when i try to start apachectl startssl i get 
this on the command line 

tokyo.computerking.ca  /usr/local/etc/apache #apachectl startssl 
Bus error (core dumped) 

I get nothing in /var/log/apache/httpd-error.log or 
/var/log/apache/sl.computerking.ca.ssl-httpd-error.log which is my log for the 
first and only virtual ssl host. 

i get this in my  /var/log/apache/ssl_engine_log 

[06/Nov/2006 14:28:13 76200] [info]  Server: Apache/1.3.37, Interface: 
mod_ssl/2.8.28, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.8a 
[06/Nov/2006 14:28:13 76200] [info]  Init: 1st startup round (still not 
detached) 
[06/Nov/2006 14:28:13 76200] [info]  Init: Initializing OpenSSL library 
[06/Nov/2006 14:28:13 76200] [info]  Init: Loading certificate  private key of 
SSL-aware server sl.computerking.ca:443:443 
[06/Nov/2006 14:28:13 76200] [info]  Init: Seeding PRNG with 136 bytes of 
entropy 
[06/Nov/2006 14:28:13 76200] [info]  Init: Generating temporary RSA private 
keys (512/1024 bits) 

could this be that my self signed cert is 2048 bits it always seemed to work 
with apache2 please help. 


-- 
Computer King/CaNMail 

http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org 

Sales, Service, and Hosting 
Email, Data, and Web Packages 
Ask about web design specials 

Affiliates 
http://www.computerking.ca/pages/links/affiliates/affiliates.htm 

Maybe Computer Science should be in the College of Theology. -- R. S. Barton  


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Antwort: Re: bus error on build/ portupgrade is doing nothing

2005-09-12 Thread Axel . Gruner

Hi,

bus error
I receive the following output on each port i try to upgrade.
So, i thought it could be a problem of RAM, after changing the RAM
twice,
the problem ist still there, so what could be the problem?

#portupgrade unzip
---  Upgrading 'unzip-5.52_1' to 'unzip-5.52_2' (archivers/unzip)
---  Building '/usr/ports/archivers/unzip'
===  Cleaning for unzip-5.52_2
===  Extracting for unzip-5.52_2
= Checksum OK for unzip552.tar.gz.
===  Patching for unzip-5.52_2
===  Applying FreeBSD patches for unzip-5.52_2
===  Configuring for unzip-5.52_2
===  Building for unzip-5.52_2
NOTE:  use bsd target for non-Intel FreeBSD compiles (if any).
make unzips CC=cc LD=cc AS=cc CF=-Wall -I. -DASM_CRC -DUNIX
-DBSD -O
-pipe  -DUSE_UNSHRINK AF=-Di386 -O -pipe  -DUSE_UNSHRINK
CRC32=crc_gcc
cc -c -Wall -I. -DASM_CRC -DUNIX -DBSD -O -pipe  -DUSE_UNSHRINK
unzip.c
unzip.c: In function `unzip':
unzip.c:1032: internal compiler error: Bus error
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
*** Error code 1

Does it always die at the same place in the build?  Typically when
I've seen internal compiler error, bad hardware is the
culprit.  Especially if the build dies at different places each time.

It is always the same place where the build dies.
Also, trying to build the world, stops with a compiler error.
Ah, FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6.

(2) portupgrade does not build
Trying to update amavisd-new or apache with portupgrade does not
work. It
just do nothing.
So, other ports are working to update, others not. So what could be
the
problem?

If you run portupgrade with -v, does it give any more detail?  Hard
to say what the problem might be without more details.  Based on your
first question, it's very likely to be a symptom of the same problem.

Uh, my fault. -v says that the port is up-to-date, but it is not.
Maybe a problem with the INDEX.
I have this problem also on a machine which builds ports and world without
any error, so i do not think it is based on the same problem.





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FW: Re: BUS ERROR from freecolor

2005-07-14 Thread PK
 hi

I have Compaq Deskpro 4000, Processor Celeron 400MHz

# sysctl hw
hw.machine: i386
hw.model: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron
hw.ncpu: 1
hw.byteorder: 1234
hw.physmem: 527929344
hw.usermem: 424464384
hw.pagesize: 4096
hw.floatingpoint: 1
hw.machine_arch: i386
hw.realmem: 536870912
hw.aac.iosize_max: 65536
hw.an.an_dump: off
hw.an.an_cache_mode: dbm
hw.an.an_cache_mcastonly: 0
hw.an.an_cache_iponly: 1
hw.ata.ata_dma: 1
hw.ata.wc: 1
hw.ata.atapi_dma: 0
hw.cardbus.debug: 0
hw.cardbus.cis_debug: 0
hw.cs.debug: 0
hw.cs.ignore_checksum_failure: 0
hw.cs.recv_delay: 570
hw.firewire.try_bmr: 1
hw.firewire.hold_count: 3
hw.firewire.fwmem.eui64_hi: 0
hw.firewire.fwmem.eui64_lo: 0
hw.firewire.fwmem.speed: 2
hw.firewire.fwe.stream_ch: 1
hw.firewire.fwe.tx_speed: 2
hw.firewire.fwe.rx_queue_len: 128
hw.firewire.sbp.auto_login: 1
hw.firewire.sbp.max_speed: -1
hw.firewire.sbp.exclusive_login: 1
hw.firewire.sbp.login_delay: 1000
hw.firewire.sbp.scan_delay: 500
hw.firewire.sbp.use_doorbell: 0
hw.firewire.sbp.tags: 0
hw.pccard.debug: 0
hw.pccard.cis_debug: 0
hw.cbb.start_memory: 2281701376
hw.cbb.start_16_io: 256
hw.cbb.start_32_io: 4096
hw.cbb.debug: 0
hw.pcic.intr_mask: 57016
hw.pci.enable_io_modes: 1
hw.pci.do_powerstate: 0
hw.pci.host_mem_start: 2147483648
hw.pci.irq_override_mask: 57080
hw.wi.txerate: 0
hw.wi.debug: 0
hw.xe.debug: 0
hw.intr_storm_threshold: 500
hw.availpages: 128889
hw.bus.devctl_disable: 0
hw.dc_quick: 1
hw.ste.rxsyncs: 0
hw.kbd.keymap_restrict_change: 0
hw.syscons.saver.keybonly: 1
hw.syscons.bell: 1
hw.syscons.sc_no_suspend_vtswitch: 0
hw.busdma.total_bpages: 33
hw.busdma.zone0.total_bpages: 1
hw.busdma.zone0.free_bpages: 1
hw.busdma.zone0.reserved_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.zone0.active_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.zone0.total_bounced: 0
hw.busdma.zone0.total_deferred: 0
hw.busdma.zone0.lowaddr: 0x
hw.busdma.zone0.alignment: 4096
hw.busdma.zone0.boundary: 0
hw.busdma.zone1.total_bpages: 32
hw.busdma.zone1.free_bpages: 32
hw.busdma.zone1.reserved_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.zone1.active_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.zone1.total_bounced: 0
hw.busdma.zone1.total_deferred: 0
hw.busdma.zone1.lowaddr: 0x
hw.busdma.zone1.alignment: 2
hw.busdma.zone1.boundary: 65536
hw.clockrate: 399
hw.instruction_sse: 0
hw.em0.debug_info: -1
hw.em0.stats: -1
hw.em0.rx_int_delay: 0
hw.em0.tx_int_delay: 66
hw.em0.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
hw.em0.tx_abs_int_delay: 66

greetings
piotr





___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:26 +0200, Simon Barner wrote:
 PK wrote:
  I have freeBSD 5.4 and newest ports tree update.
  I've installed freecolor from ports without errors,
  but if I try to start it, I get following error:
 
 Works fine here.
 
 Please report this to freecolor's maintainer (see the Makefile). This
 might be a 64bit issue, so tell him what platform you are seeing this
 error on.

He already has :)

It works for me also, and I even gave him a pre-compiled package that
was known to work on my system.

I hadn't thought about the 64 bit issue - PK, what platform are you
running this on? That said - it works on my sparc64...

Cheers,
Tim.

-- 
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984


---End Message---
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bus error w/ mozilla or firefox

2005-04-10 Thread Bachelier Vincent
Does it segment fault when you start it from console ?
If it does, just delete .gtk*, it should work after that.

Le Dimanche 10 Avril 2005 21:36, Gary Kline a écrit :
   People,

   I need some clues as to *why* after the gnome update script
   has finished on my laptop neither mozilla nor firefox run.

   Note that on my laptop, there were not many files that
   needed to be rebuilt.

   One question seems apropos here: why can't the gnome
   (and kde) upgrades be handled thru Packages rather than
   by source rebuilding?

   (AFter 2+ days of running the script here on tao
   --a 750MHz platform--I the script may have succeeded;
   the laptop in a 400MHz  ThinkPad.  ... )

   Help? Suggestions anybody?

   gary
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bus error w/ mozilla or firefox

2005-04-10 Thread Gary Kline
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:11:14AM +0200, Bachelier Vincent wrote:
 Does it segment fault when you start it from console ?
 If it does, just delete .gtk*, it should work after that.


It wasn't a segv, it was a Bus error  (core dumped).
This was left in ~/.

-rw---   1 kline  kline  3612672 Apr 10 17:50 mozilla-bin.core

I believe that the update script will run to completion
once I have ruby18 updated.  But it dies on me too...  
:-(

gary


 
 Le Dimanche 10 Avril 2005 21:36, Gary Kline a écrit :
  People,
 
  I need some clues as to *why* after the gnome update script
  has finished on my laptop neither mozilla nor firefox run.
 
  Note that on my laptop, there were not many files that
  needed to be rebuilt.
 
  One question seems apropos here: why can't the gnome
  (and kde) upgrades be handled thru Packages rather than
  by source rebuilding?
 
  (AFter 2+ days of running the script here on tao
  --a 750MHz platform--I the script may have succeeded;
  the laptop in a 400MHz  ThinkPad.  ... )
 
  Help? Suggestions anybody?
 
  gary
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
   Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org Public service Unix

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Resolved: Re: bus error

2003-06-26 Thread David S. Jackson
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:41:40PM -0400 David S. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:49:19PM -0700 Joshua Oreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   for xinit.core:
   #0  0x2805826b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
   Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe6bc.
  
  As I feared. If you've got the developer mentality, forge ahead.
  If not, forget about it :-)
  
  You have to recompile those programs with debugging flags.
  make configure the port, take a look at the software Makefile
  (the one in work/portname-portversion/), and look for a
  line that starts with CFLAGS=. Add ` -g' (without the quotes, of
  course), to the end. Run make inside the software directory
  (/usr/ports/category/port/work/port-portversion/).
  Take the newly produced executable (it should be either in the
  directory you ran 'make' in, or one of the subdirectories) and
  run it under gdb (gdb myexecutable). Type `run' at the gdb prompt.
  When it crashes, type `bt'. Send us the output :-)
 
 Turns out make doesn't finish operating.  pkg -r'ed another vim
 package,
 
 This time when I execute it:
 
 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6: invalid file
 format.
 
 Strangely, this happened while in a tty, not an x window.  (X
 won't start, still.)

I wound up removing the XFree86 package and rebuilding the port
from scratch.  I guess I could have reinstalled the package, too.
Anyway, that worked, so far.

-- 
David S. Jackson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comedy, like Medicine, was never meant to be practiced
by the general public.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bus error

2003-06-25 Thread David S. Jackson
Joshua Oreman suggested I try bt while in gdb looking at the
core files.  The output from that command was:

for vim.core:

#0  0x2815a26b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe6e0.

for xinit.core:
#0  0x2805826b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe6bc.

There is no /etc/malloc.conf file.  Should there be?

[Sorry about not including the post--I had to get this off the
archives, since I tried Earthlink's Spaminator, and it deleted
everything from freebsd.org  Oops.]

-- 
David S. Jackson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I was in Vegas last week. I was at the roulette table,
having a lengthy argument about what I considered an
Odd number.  -- Steven Wright
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bus error

2003-06-25 Thread David S. Jackson
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can you rule out hardware problems?  Possibly a disk going bad?
 I hope you've been making backups.  You didn't run fsck while
 the partition was mounted, did you?  If so, umount the
 partition and run fsck until it reports no errors and see if
 that fixes things.

The slice seems to fsck just fine.  No errors.  But, /mnt/usr1 is
a different story though...  Oof.  

-- 
David S. Jackson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Faster, faster, you fool, you fool!
-- Bill Cosby
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bus error

2003-06-25 Thread Joshua Oreman
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:49:30PM -0400 or thereabouts, David S. Jackson wrote:
 Joshua Oreman suggested I try bt while in gdb looking at the
 core files.  The output from that command was:
 
 for vim.core:
 
 #0  0x2815a26b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
 Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe6e0.
 
 for xinit.core:
 #0  0x2805826b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
 Cannot access memory at address 0xbfbfe6bc.

As I feared. If you've got the developer mentality, forge ahead.
If not, forget about it :-)

You have to recompile those programs with debugging flags.
make configure the port, take a look at the software Makefile
(the one in work/portname-portversion/), and look for a
line that starts with CFLAGS=. Add ` -g' (without the quotes, of
course), to the end. Run make inside the software directory
(/usr/ports/category/port/work/port-portversion/).
Take the newly produced executable (it should be either in the
directory you ran 'make' in, or one of the subdirectories) and
run it under gdb (gdb myexecutable). Type `run' at the gdb prompt.
When it crashes, type `bt'. Send us the output :-)

 
 There is no /etc/malloc.conf file.  Should there be?

It's okay the way it is.

-- Josh

 
 [Sorry about not including the post--I had to get this off the
 archives, since I tried Earthlink's Spaminator, and it deleted
 everything from freebsd.org  Oops.]
 
 -- 
 David S. Jackson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 I was in Vegas last week. I was at the roulette table,
 having a lengthy argument about what I considered an
 Odd number.  -- Steven Wright
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bus error

2003-06-24 Thread Bill Moran
David S. Jackson wrote:
Hi,

First, forgive me if this doesn't come through devoid of html.  I'm
normally a mutt user, but I'm trying evolution.  We'll see how it goes.
I'm on a $.%-STABLE system, and I've been experiencing some disk errors;
I did an fsck -y on the slice where /usr lives.  (I forgot it was /usr
when I did this.)
Since then, I've received various program terminated with signal 10. 
Bus error. problems.  Examples are vim and xinit.  As you can imagine,
I'm eager to fix this so I can get X back.  Looking at the core files
left behind by X and by vim, I see the following:

*** snip ***
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software ... blah blah ...
This GDB was configured as i386-unknown-freebsd ...
(no debugging symbols found)...
Core was generated by 'vim'.
Program terminated with signal 10. Bus error.
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk12.so.2...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk12.so.2...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgmodule12.so.3...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libglib12.so.3...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libintl.so.2...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
#0 0x2815a26b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
(gdb)
*** snip ***

That was for vim.  Here's for xinit:

*** snip ***
GNU gdb 4.18 
blah blah blah
Core was generated by 'xinit'.
Program terminated with signal 10. Bus error.
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
found...done.
#0 0x2805826b in memset () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
(gdb)
*** snip ***

I typed all this by hand, so hopefully I have it correct.

Notes:  this problem is about 48 hours old.  So far I've tried remaking
ld-elf.so.1 from /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf and copying ld-elf.so.1 from
/usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf to /usr/libexec/, but even from single
user runlevel, this was not allowed.
I've thought about remaking the system, but I'm thinking that if
ld-elf.so is broken, things probably wouldn't make correctly for a new
system.  Am I wrong on that?
I've also thought about reinstalling a binary distribution on top of all
this (upgrade from a new 4.8-stable CD), but that's an even bigger risk,
I would think.
So, what would you gurus do?  What should be my next step for trying to
salvage my system here?
Can you rule out hardware problems?  Possibly a disk going bad?  I hope
you've been making backups.
You didn't run fsck while the partition was mounted, did you?  If so, umount
the partition and run fsck until it reports no errors and see if that fixes
things.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bus error (core dumped) when running pkg_add

2002-09-27 Thread John Bleichert

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Søren Neigaard wrote:

 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:44:57 +0200
 From: Søren Neigaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Bus error (core dumped) when running pkg_add
 
 If I try to run pkg_add on either a tbz file, tgz file or without
 specifying any file, it core dumps. Here is the message:
 
 Bus error (core dumped)
 Sep 27 21:41:06 neigaard /kernel: pid 110 (pkg_add), uid 0: exited on
 signal 10
 (core dumped)
 
 What is this, is it a hardware error? I dont seem to have any other
 problems, and I have just installed this 4.6.2 on this machine without
 any problems.
 
 Please help, I don't know what to do.
 

Since no-one jumped in on this... A bus error is similar to a segfault, I 
believe. It means an app tried to access some memory outside it's 
accessible range or tried to access an array element outside the array's 
dimensions - something of that sort. I believe a 'bus' error means 
accessing a stack frame not owned by the app, or a bad access inside an 
owned stack frame? 

The pkg_* tools are pretty widely used and tested. This being the case I'd 
guess this may be a hardware error, possibly bad RAM?

This is speculation at best. Possibly re-compile pkg_add with debug 
support and run it in a debugger or try some different memory?

Which FBSD version are you runnnig? Arent there issues with the pkg_* 
tools and the tbz/tgz file types at the moment?

Dunno, maybe you found a bug ? ;-)

Good luck!

JB

#  John Bleichert 
#  http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message