On Apr 3, 2005 3:09 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2005 3:02 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 2005 2:52 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > > >
On Apr 3, 2005 3:02 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2005 2:52 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > > FX-53R rm -r /stand
> > > > FX-53R ls
> > > > bin cdrom dev entr
On Apr 3, 2005 2:52 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > FX-53R rm -r /stand
> > > FX-53R ls
> > > bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr
> > > bootcompat distetc
On Apr 3, 2005 2:46 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > FX-53R rm -r /stand
> > FX-53R ls
> > bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr
> > bootcompat distetc libexec procsbintmp var
> > FX-53R
> >
> > Doesnt this look mu
Gert Cuykens wrote:
FX-53R rm -r /stand
FX-53R ls
bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr
bootcompat distetc libexec procsbintmp var
FX-53R
Doesnt this look much better :)
Next what do i have to do to remove /compat /sys and /rescue ?
Dont fo
On Apr 3, 2005 2:42 AM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FX-53R rm -r /stand
> FX-53R ls
> bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr
> bootcompat distetc libexec procsbintmp var
> FX-53R
>
> Doesnt this look much better :)
>
> Next what
FX-53R rm -r /stand
FX-53R ls
bin cdrom dev entropy lib mnt rescue sys usr
bootcompat distetc libexec procsbintmp var
FX-53R
Doesnt this look much better :)
Next what do i have to do to remove /compat /sys and /rescue ?
___
Chris wrote:
I did like the idea of rm -r /boot
I hate that / in the beginning - can I get rid of it by 'rm -r /'?
Really, while I can sometimes find it intertaining to wonder and discuss
the reasons for whatever wierdness people my prefer, and see the
discussion to go off track. I think we shoul
dick hoogendijk wrote:
Some people like sysinstall as a postconfiguration tool, and documen-
tation refers to this. But you can run it from /usr/sbin/sysinstall
I can't. Nor have I something like '/rescue/init'
So I assume you're taking me (us?) on?
I don't know which system you're on. Both are pre
On Saturday 02 April 2005 23:19, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:13:11 +0200
>
> "Erik Nørgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some people like sysinstall as a postconfiguration tool, and documen-
> > tation refers to this. But you can run it from /usr/sbin/sysinstall
>
> I can't.
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:13:11 +0200
"Erik Nørgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people like sysinstall as a postconfiguration tool, and documen-
> tation refers to this. But you can run it from /usr/sbin/sysinstall
I can't. Nor have I something like '/rescue/init'
So I assume you're taking m
Gert Cuykens wrote:
You might want to check your init_path in loader.conf, in
/boot/defaults/loader.conf it is set to
/sbin/init:/sbin/oinit:/sbin/init.bak:/stand/sysinstall
it would be sensible to replace /stand/sysinstall by /rescue/init
What happens if i leave /stand/sysinstall and put nothing
On Saturday 02 April 2005 08:56, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2005 10:50 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > On Apr 1, 2005 11:54 PM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >>On Apr 1, 2005 7:05 AM, Donald J. O'Neill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Danny Pansters wrote:
On Saturday 02 April 2005 22:24, Chris wrote:
Are we to assume you are joking?
Yes.
I did like the idea of rm -r /boot
--
Best regards,
Chris
The only game that can't be fixed is peek-a-boo.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
On Saturday 02 April 2005 22:24, Chris wrote:
> Are we to assume you are joking?
Yes.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Danny Pansters wrote:
I am not tampering with it i am modifying it :) You learn allot, just
close your eyes sroll trough the / directory and when you say stop
open your eyes again and try to move or delete the file. The
difference between a good and a bad os is the good one let you get
away with i
On 02 Apr Danny Pansters wrote:
> I suggest /sbin now and at a later stage /boot. There's already a
> /bin, right, who needs an /sbin. Do keep /usr/doc and /usr/share/man
> for emergencies.
"LOL*
But I don't think our guy is gonna understand your humorous reply.
Personally I hardly can believe h
> > > I am not tampering with it i am modifying it :) You learn allot, just
> > > close your eyes sroll trough the / directory and when you say stop
> > > open your eyes again and try to move or delete the file. The
> > > difference between a good and a bad os is the good one let you get
> > > aw
On Apr 2, 2005 7:06 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > On Apr 2, 2005 10:50 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Gert Cuykens wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Apr 1, 2005 11:54 PM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> On Apr 1, 2005 7:05 AM, Donald J. O'N
Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Apr 2, 2005 10:50 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 11:54 PM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 7:05 AM, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:26 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
It bugs
On Apr 2, 2005 10:50 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > On Apr 1, 2005 11:54 PM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Apr 1, 2005 7:05 AM, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:26 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> >>>
>
Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 11:54 PM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 7:05 AM, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:26 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
It bugs me...
NO, leave things as they are. If you delete all the things that have
been b
On Apr 1, 2005 11:11 AM, Erik Nørgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > It bugs me...
>
> yes you can. If you need to run sysinstall later it will be in
> /usr/sbin/sysinstall
>
> You might want to check your init_path in loader.conf, in
> /boot/defaults/loader.conf it is set
On Apr 1, 2005 11:54 PM, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2005 7:05 AM, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 March 2005 07:26 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > It bugs me...
> >
> > NO, leave things as they are. If you delete all the things that have
> > be
Gert Cuykens wrote:
It bugs me...
yes you can. If you need to run sysinstall later it will be in
/usr/sbin/sysinstall
You might want to check your init_path in loader.conf, in
/boot/defaults/loader.conf it is set to
/sbin/init:/sbin/oinit:/sbin/init.bak:/stand/sysinstall
it would be sensible
25 matches
Mail list logo