Re: chkrootkit version 0.41 results on FBSD 5.1R#0
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:14:45AM -0700, Tak Pui LOU wrote: > I read about this before. But, I just updated the port source tree and did > a portupgrade. These programs are still listed as INFECTED. So, my > question should be if these have been fixed or someone is really messing > with my system. This question is asked regularly on the FreeBSD mailing lists. Please do some further research. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: chkrootkit version 0.41 results on FBSD 5.1R#0
I read about this before. But, I just updated the port source tree and did a portupgrade. These programs are still listed as INFECTED. So, my question should be if these have been fixed or someone is really messing with my system. --- Lou On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:02:19AM -0700, Tak Pui LOU wrote: > > I have the following listed as INFECTED: > > > > Checking `chfn'... INFECTED > > Checking `chsh'... INFECTED > > Checking `date'... INFECTED > > Checking `ls'... INFECTED > > Checking `ps'... INFECTED > > > > Does anyone have the same output? > > FAQ..please consult the archives. > > Kris > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: chkrootkit version 0.41 results on FBSD 5.1R#0
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:02:19AM -0700, Tak Pui LOU wrote: > I have the following listed as INFECTED: > > Checking `chfn'... INFECTED > Checking `chsh'... INFECTED > Checking `date'... INFECTED > Checking `ls'... INFECTED > Checking `ps'... INFECTED > > Does anyone have the same output? FAQ..please consult the archives. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
