Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
On 11/14/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514 716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] I ran into a similar issue with cups - what does 'portaudit -aF' give on each machine? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514 716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 04:32:12 pm Kurt Buff wrote: On 11/14/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c 2514 716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] I ran into a similar issue with cups - what does 'portaudit -aF' give on each machine? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] interesting, portaudit seems to be part of the 7.0 base system now. on my BETA2 box: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# portaudit -aF auditfile.tbz 100% of 45 kB 100 kBps New database installed. Affected package: cups-base-1.3.3 Type of problem: xpdf -- multiple remote Stream.CC vulnerabilities. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/2747fc39-915b-11dc-9239-001c2514716c.html Affected package: cups-base-1.3.3 Type of problem: cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514716c.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) immediately. portaudit is not installed on my 6.2 server, so i have no data to print for that one. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
On 11/14/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 04:32:12 pm Kurt Buff wrote: On 11/14/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c 2514 716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] I ran into a similar issue with cups - what does 'portaudit -aF' give on each machine? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] interesting, portaudit seems to be part of the 7.0 base system now. on my BETA2 box: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# portaudit -aF auditfile.tbz 100% of 45 kB 100 kBps New database installed. Affected package: cups-base-1.3.3 Type of problem: xpdf -- multiple remote Stream.CC vulnerabilities. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/2747fc39-915b-11dc-9239-001c2514716c.html Affected package: cups-base-1.3.3 Type of problem: cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514716c.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) immediately. portaudit is not installed on my 6.2 server, so i have no data to print for that one. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] That lack of portaudit on your 6.2 system is probably why it doesn't care. I'll bet that if you had installed portaudit on your 6.2 system before trying to update, it wouldn't build either, until the port was updated, which happened a day or so ago. Further, I'll guess that the ports tree on your 7.0 system doesn't contain the updated port for cups - I don't have a 7.0 system on which to test, and don't have a sophisticated understanding of how all that works, but it's possible that the ports tree for 7.0 doesn't have the updates. Kurt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another?
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: Jonathan Horne wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its items it updated: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: === cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: = cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6- 001c2514 716 c.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base 1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. Kris what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. thanks, Portaudit was updated w/r to cups-base at 2019 UDT 14 Nov man portaudit portaudit -Fa will update and check. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ I am Andean project. http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
