Re: deciphering top(1) output

2011-02-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Alexander Best wrote: a) my system is 100% idle, since no processes except the idle process takes up up CPU time or b) that a or some processes take up 2% CPU time which aren't being shown or c) that each of my cpu core is only 86.6/89.4% idle? It means (c).

Re: deciphering top(1) output

2011-02-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 11 11, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Alexander Best wrote: a) my system is 100% idle, since no processes except the idle process takes up up CPU time or b) that a or some processes take up 2% CPU time which aren't being shown or c) that each of my cpu

Re: deciphering top(1) output

2011-02-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Alexander Best wrote: It means (c). Kernel activity, short-lived transient processes, and imperfections in sampling data are the other ~13 / 10 % thanks. it seems in some cases these imperfections have quite an impact: last pid: 48135; load averages:

Re: deciphering top(1) output

2011-02-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 11 11, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Alexander Best wrote: It means (c). Kernel activity, short-lived transient processes, and imperfections in sampling data are the other ~13 / 10 % thanks. it seems in some cases these imperfections have quite an

Re: deciphering top(1) output

2011-02-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Alexander Best wrote: also i noticed that when a processes CPU activity goes up to let's say 10% and then down again to 0% this doesn't mean that the idle process will jump to 200% instantly, but it takes ~ 10 seconds for it to reclaim the CPU activity that was