On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 12:49, stan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:33:09PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 12:00, stan wrote:
> > > This is the 3rd week in a row where cvsup followed by portupgrade has
> > > failed to build flac.
> > >
> > > Is this a known problem? I'
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:33:09PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 12:00, stan wrote:
> > This is the 3rd week in a row where cvsup followed by portupgrade has
> > failed to build flac.
> >
> > Is this a known problem? I'm getting a syntax error message, if that helps.
>
>
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:24:04AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:00 am, stan wrote:
> > This is the 3rd week in a row where cvsup followed by portupgrade has
> > failed to build flac.
> >
> > Is this a known problem? I'm getting a syntax error message, if that
> > helps.
>
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 12:00, stan wrote:
> This is the 3rd week in a row where cvsup followed by portupgrade has
> failed to build flac.
>
> Is this a known problem? I'm getting a syntax error message, if that helps.
I encountered this, too. Simply remove the old version of flac, then
the new on
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:00 am, stan wrote:
> This is the 3rd week in a row where cvsup followed by portupgrade has
> failed to build flac.
>
> Is this a known problem? I'm getting a syntax error message, if that
> helps.
It was upgraded to 1.1.0 2 weeks ago. Have you been updating your INDEX
a
