In response to Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This is a local denial of service bug, which was fixed 6 weeks ago in HEAD
> ^^^
> > That was what I expected. Section III seems to hint t
Bill Moran wrote:
> Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is a local denial of service bug, which was fixed 6 weeks ago in HEAD
^^^
> That was what I expected. Section III seems to hint that it could be
> used by an unprivilidged user to crash or lo
Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > This report seems pretty vague. I'm unsure as to whether the alleged
> > "bug" gives the user any more permissions than he'd already have? Anyone
> > know any details?
>
> This is a local denial of service bug, which was fixed 6
Bill Moran wrote:
> This report seems pretty vague. I'm unsure as to whether the alleged
> "bug" gives the user any more permissions than he'd already have? Anyone
> know any details?
This is a local denial of service bug, which was fixed 6 weeks ago in HEAD
and RELENG_6. There is no opportunit
