Re: Installkernel Failure

2010-08-03 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:33 PM, David Allen the.real.david.al...@gmail.com wrote: There is no ncp.ko on the successfully upgraded system. Do both machines have identical /etc/make.conf and/or /etc/src.conf? -- chs, ___

Re: Installkernel Failure

2010-08-03 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 12:33:04 David Allen wrote: I recently upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1. I'm now trying to install FreeBSD 8.1 to a second system by performing a minimal install, and then NFS mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj from the just-upgraded system. Simple enough, right?

Re: Installkernel Failure

2010-08-03 Thread David Allen
Aargh. I remembered to type in the KERNCONF= value, but neglected to include the following: NO_PROFILE=TRUE BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED=115200 I suppose the above belongs it src.conf, but that aside, I'll assume it's the NO_PROFILE bit that's mucking things up. Thanks for the replies, Pieter and

Re: installkernel on small disk

2009-02-09 Thread Albert Shih
Le 08/02/2009 à 01:51:50-0700, Tim Judd a écrit Albert Shih wrote: Hi all I've two servers (in fact guest in vmware) on don't have enought disk space to make buildkernel (or world). For the world freebsd-update can work. But for the kernel I've my own kernel. So if I compile

Re: installkernel on small disk

2009-02-09 Thread Tim Judd
Albert Shih wrote: Le 08/02/2009 à 01:51:50-0700, Tim Judd a écrit Albert Shih wrote: Hi all I've two servers (in fact guest in vmware) on don't have enought disk space to make buildkernel (or world). For the world freebsd-update can work. But for the kernel I've my own kernel. So

Re: installkernel on small disk

2009-02-08 Thread Tim Judd
Albert Shih wrote: Hi all I've two servers (in fact guest in vmware) on don't have enought disk space to make buildkernel (or world). For the world freebsd-update can work. But for the kernel I've my own kernel. So if I compile the kernel on the other server how can I put it on the first ?

Re: installkernel

2006-06-06 Thread Charles Howse
On Jun 6, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Jonathan Herriott wrote: Ok, so I obtained the latest release of the kernel source, and I followed what it said to do in the /usr/src/Makefile. Here's what it says in the Makefile: # For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a # delta of

Re: installkernel remotely

2003-10-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:25:54PM -0400, Alexey Koptsevich wrote: Hello, I have a problem with the remote kernel install. I have cvsup'ed, built and installed the system (-CURRENT) on one host, then mounted its /usr/src and /usr/obj to another host (running 5.1-RELEASE). When I try to

Re: Installkernel fails on 4.7Rel p2

2003-02-24 Thread Lowell Gilbert
taxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I can't figure this one out, I have already installed a custom kernel on this sytem and now I'm trying to make a new one. It build fine, but intallkernel fails with: install -o root -g wheel -m 555 joy.ko /modules install -o root -g wheel -m 444

Re: Installkernel fails on 4.7Rel p2

2003-02-23 Thread taxman
On Sunday 23 February 2003 07:10 am, taxman wrote: Hi, I can't figure this one out, I have already installed a custom kernel on this sytem and now I'm trying to make a new one. It build fine, but intallkernel fails with: install -o root -g wheel -m 555 joy.ko /modules install -o root -g

Re: installkernel first?

2003-02-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:27:47PM +1030, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not being familiar with single user mode, I didn't realise that only / was mounted in that mode (so why does the handbook put fsck -p as the FIRST command, before mount -a ? sigh). That would be because fsck(8) only works

Re: installkernel first?

2003-02-21 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-02-21 16:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had taken makeworld.html from the handbook and used links to save as formatted text prior to printing out the contents. Not being familiar with single user mode, I didn't realise that only / was mounted in that mode (so why does the handbook put

Re: installkernel first?

2003-02-20 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I'm tracking 4.7 stable. The handbook asks me to: go to single user mode and fsck -p (etc ...) Can't. /dev/ad2s1a: NO WRITE ACCESS /dev/ad2s1a: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. (Mounted RW according to fstab). This looks like

Re: installkernel first?

2003-02-20 Thread Peter Hollaubek
On Feb 20, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm tracking 4.7 stable. The handbook asks me to: go to single user mode and fsck -p (etc ...) Can't. /dev/ad2s1a: NO WRITE ACCESS /dev/ad2s1a: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. (Mounted RW according to fstab). after make buildworld

Re: installkernel first? [ a few additions to this reply ]

2003-02-20 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 04:37:10PM +0100, Peter Hollaubek wrote: On Feb 20, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm tracking 4.7 stable. The handbook asks me to: go to single user mode and fsck -p (etc ...) Can't. /dev/ad2s1a: NO WRITE ACCESS /dev/ad2s1a: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN

Re: installkernel first?

2003-02-20 Thread bastill
Quoting Peter Hollaubek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As of /usr/src/UPDATING: To update from 4.0-RELEASE or later to the most current 4.x-STABLE -- make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE make installkernel

Re: installkernel first?

2003-02-20 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:27:47PM +1030, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Peter Hollaubek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: snip Not being familiar with sh (and not thinking too well either) I assumed that make buildkernel # make installkernel was two linked commands on the one line, wheras it should have