On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:44:29 -0800 Gary Kline wrote:
Can you
[[ or anyone else onlist ]] tell me of successes or snafus in building 2.3.1
from src??
Yes, I do build openoffice.org (russian LANG) at my tinderbox and it
fails rarely (may be once per ten times).
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:44:29 -0800
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:37:18 Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To cut down my email I unsub'd to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To cut down my email I unsub'd to the OOo mailing list, so I'll ask
here if there is a new package of the latest or near-latest that I
can set off at night and have it
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:37:18 Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:20:53 -0800
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To cut down my email I unsub'd to the OOo mailing list, so I'll ask
here if there is a new package of the latest or near-latest that I
can set off at night and
My personal choice is to run 32-bit Linux version of OO under linux
emulation (2.4.x branch)
First of all it survives FreeBSD base system/gcc/etc updates pretty well
:) when using native one you should fiddle with compat libraries
sometimes and so on.
Second -- it runs faster than native
