On Sunday 21 June 2009 12:30:26 Tim Judd wrote:
> On 6/21/09, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Tim Judd writes:
> >> Something dawned on me. FreeBSD/Open/Net are all well secured
> >> systems. On an Internet-facing router, would applying a higher
> >> kern.securelevel provide any better, tighter, high
On 6/21/09, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Tim Judd writes:
>
>> Something dawned on me. FreeBSD/Open/Net are all well secured
>> systems. On an Internet-facing router, would applying a higher
>> kern.securelevel provide any better, tighter, higher security if the
>> machine was broken into? Given yo
2009/6/19 Tim Judd :
> Something dawned on me. FreeBSD/Open/Net are all well secured
> systems. On an Internet-facing router, would applying a higher
> kern.securelevel provide any better, tighter, higher security if the
> machine was broken into? Given you need to lower the securelevel
> before
Tim Judd writes:
> Something dawned on me. FreeBSD/Open/Net are all well secured
> systems. On an Internet-facing router, would applying a higher
> kern.securelevel provide any better, tighter, higher security if the
> machine was broken into? Given you need to lower the securelevel
> before m
