I think we have the same issue
Working on this problem for months now and I can't find the problem. I also
used the FreeBSD as a NATd server for my ADSL(tun0) connection.
I have some other server demons running, but switching them off gives no
positive effect on the upload speed (average it'
I think we have the same issue
Working on this problem for months now and I can't find the problem. I also
used the FreeBSD as a NATd server for my ADSL(tun0) connection.
I have some other server demons running, but switching them off gives no
positive effect on the upload speed (average it'
Sorry,
I can't resist this either. I work for VOL DSL tech support and have seen
many many problems with the Realtek 8139 EVEN with Windoze. So, you'd better
believe that if even Windoze has issues with this card then BSD will too.
--charlie
On Nov 6, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Jack L. Stone wrote:
This "price advice" then implies that if Realtek simply raised their
prices, the card would be just fine...??
No. The price advice implies that a NIC that is worth $5 is probably
not as good as a NIC which is worth $50. If Realtek raised their
p
At 01:17 PM 11.6.2003 +, Chris Howells wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi,
>
>On Wednesday 05 November 2003 11:25, silent slim wrote:
>> i'd like the network to go at 100Mbps since both cards could be able too
>> and the current speeds are laughable.
>
>The RealTek 813
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 11:25, silent slim wrote:
> i'd like the network to go at 100Mbps since both cards could be able too
> and the current speeds are laughable.
The RealTek 8139 (rl0 and rl1) are pretty shitty network cards, the cheapes
r10 looks good, but r11 looks real bad. If it is a driver issue
see if there are some settings you can tweak in the driver, or update
it, or make sure it is using the right one. You could try a line like
"ifconfig_r11 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" in the rc.conf
file. I don't kno
> > >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: lan bandwidth issue
> > >Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:52:47 +0100
> > >
> > >On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0700, silent slim wrote:
> > >> This has gotta be a software issue... it seems logical
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:25:12AM -0700, silent slim wrote:
> >From: Alex de Kruijff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: silent slim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: lan bandwidth issue
> >Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:52:47 +0100
>
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 22:25, silent slim wrote:
>
> >From: Alex de Kruijff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: silent slim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: lan bandwidth issue
> >Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:52:47 +0100
> >
>
From: Alex de Kruijff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: silent slim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lan bandwidth issue
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:52:47 +0100
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0700, silent slim wrote:
> This has gotta be a software issue... it
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0700, silent slim wrote:
> This has gotta be a software issue... it seems logically impossible for
> it to be otherwise. I have my windows box running off a nat on my fbsd
> box, it transmits to my isp at a max of about 160k down 70k up.
> Transfering files betw
12 matches
Mail list logo