Re: libstdc++.so.5 howto ...

2005-12-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I guess what I was trying to say is that I am very confused about all this
 linux compatible stuff. I noticed there are many emulator ports for red hat,
 suse, etc. and it is not clear to me which strategy to use. There's even an
 Xfree linux compat in there, what for?

For linking to Linux applications.

 If I have an executable complaining that it cannot find libstdc++.so.5, what
 can I do?

Since it's supposed to be a Linux application, it should be getting it
out of the Linux compatibility area.  You said that was in place, so
the question is why the linker isn't finding that one.

 Perhaps there is a useful guide out there someplace, the FreeBSD handbook
 chapter on the subject is very short.

man linux, for one thing.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: libstdc++.so.5 howto ...

2005-12-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I have installed another linux application (komodo 3.5) that requires
 the 'libstdc++.so.5' library.
 
 I did a install linux_base install from the default which results
 in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 being created.

I highly doubt that.  By default it should be under /usr/compat/linux.

 The file /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 is present (after
 installing the red-hat 9.x stuff) but for some reason cannot be found by
 the new application.
 
 Can anyone please help me?

Did you remember to use brandelf(1) on the Linux executable?



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: libstdc++.so.5 howto ...

2005-12-05 Thread Kiffin Gish
I guess what I was trying to say is that I am very confused about all this
linux compatible stuff. I noticed there are many emulator ports for red hat,
suse, etc. and it is not clear to me which strategy to use. There's even an
Xfree linux compat in there, what for?

If I have an executable complaining that it cannot find libstdc++.so.5, what
can I do?

Perhaps there is a useful guide out there someplace, the FreeBSD handbook
chapter on the subject is very short.

-- 
Kiffin Rex Gish
Gouda, The Netherlands

 



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
 Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 23:47
 To: Kiffin Gish
 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: libstdc++.so.5 howto ...
 
 
 Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I have installed another linux application (komodo 3.5) 
 that requires 
  the 'libstdc++.so.5' library.
  
  I did a install linux_base install from the default which 
 results in 
  /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 being created.
 
 I highly doubt that.  By default it should be under /usr/compat/linux.
 
  The file /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 is present (after 
  installing the red-hat 9.x stuff) but for some reason 
 cannot be found 
  by the new application.
  
  Can anyone please help me?
 
 Did you remember to use brandelf(1) on the Linux executable?
 
 
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]