Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-18 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
...@predatorlabs.net Cc: User Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem 2010/10/16 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net: 2010/10/16 Fernando Apestegu=EDa fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough me= mory

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-18 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
2010/10/17 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net: 2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the thing, compiling the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 optimization flag. With

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-18 Thread Robert Bonomi
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:28:15 +0200 From: Fernando_Apesteguia fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: libxul compilation problem I still refuse to think 1GB is low ;) though I could be wrong. One gig of RAM is not the problem. 1.25 gig total of VM _is_. I have some stuff I run

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
2010/10/16 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net: 2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory. In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the ports from a fresh running system

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Robert Bonomi
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Oct 17 11:46:48 2010 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com To: Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net Cc: User Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-17 Thread Rob Farmer
2010/10/17 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: The machine has one single core cpu. Finally I was able to compile the thing, compiling the offending file by hand (nsHtml5ElementName.cpp) without the -O2 optimization flag. With this flag, cc1plus eats up all the memory of my

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-16 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
2010/10/15 Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net: 2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform. The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-16 Thread Rob Farmer
2010/10/16 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: I didn't run X or whatsoever. That's why I think I should have enough memory. In fact after getting that error, I rebooted so I could update the ports from a fresh running system (nothing cached or so). But even in that case, I'm

Re: libxul compilation problem

2010-10-15 Thread Rob Farmer
2010/10/15 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com: The process being killed is cc1plus while compiling libxul. I'm running a stock 8.1-RELEASE GENERIC kernel on amd64 platform. The machine has 1Gb of physical memory and 256MB for swap (I have had this setup for quite a long time and