PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca writes:
/compat/llinux/sbin/ldconfig :
ELF binary type '3' not known syntax error: ( unexpected - error code 2
Have you load linuxulator? You may check it:
-
% kldstat | grep linux
63 0x8100d000 413f0linux.ko
-
You may do it by hand with
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:58:05 -0400
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Let's try 3 questions, all related.
1. Which linux emulator is one supposed to use or is this something
that should not be installed and left to be handled as a dependency
by ports?
2. I am trying to install ogle on
RW wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:58:05 -0400
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Let's try 3 questions, all related.
1. Which linux emulator is one supposed to use or is this something
that should not be installed and left to be handled as a dependency
by ports?
2. I am trying to
RW wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:58:05 -0400
PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
Let's try 3 questions, all related.
1. Which linux emulator is one supposed to use or is this something
that should not be installed and left to be handled as a dependency
by ports?
2. I am trying to install
PJ wrote:
Let's try 3 questions, all related.
1. Which linux emulator is one supposed to use or is this something that
should not be installed and left to be handled as a dependency by ports?
2. I am trying to install ogle on FreeBSD 7.2 running on amd64. I have
installed linux-base-fc4.
On Friday 24 July 2009 06:58:05 PJ wrote:
Let's try 3 questions, all related.
1. Which linux emulator is one supposed to use or is this something that
should not be installed and left to be handled as a dependency by ports?
fc4 is the default. But Skype for example, really wants fc6 or higher.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:51:28PM +0200, Joachim Jaeckel wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use a linux application under a FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE.
Most things works fine, but sometimes I get the following error message:
linux: 'ipc' typ=258 not implemented
and the selected function in
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It certainly could! Patches should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for review :-)
Doesn't that error basically mean unimplemented linux syscall or
something like that?
--
Shawn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://drevil.warpcore.org/
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:42:06PM -0500, Shawn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It certainly could! Patches should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for review :-)
Doesn't that error basically mean unimplemented linux syscall or
something like that?
Right, it needs
