Re: make index broken?

2004-12-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Kevin A. Pieckiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm running 5.3 on i386 (built from sources DL'ed via CVS on
 2 Dec 2004) and a ports tree (complete) that was downloaded via
 CVS on 2 Dec 2004.  My src tree is pulling from the RELENG_5
 tag and my ports tree is pulling from HEAD.  As of a fresh CVS
 of ports today (6 Dec 2004), I still cannot issue a 'make index'
 while in /usr/ports.  What am I doing wrong?  I keep getting the
 following error message (which I also got while running 5.2.1
 before upgrading to 5.3):
 
 Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..Makefile, line 34: warning: String 
 comparison operator should be either == or !=
 Makefile, line 34: Malformed conditional (defined(PHP_VERS)  ${PHP_VERS} 
  420)
 Makefile, line 34: Need an operator
 Makefile, line 36: if-less endif
 Makefile, line 36: Need an operator
 make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
 === databases/pear-DB_DataObject failed
 *** Error code 1
 1 error

Hmm.  Maybe you're using the wrong make program?
What does which make tell you?

-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: make index broken?

2004-12-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:17:46PM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:03:53AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
  Hmm.  Maybe you're using the wrong make program?
  What does which make tell you?
 
 /usr/bin/make
 
 The 'make fetchindex' is what I ultimately used, but I'd
 really like to know why this is broken.  It's broken on at
 least three machines that I know of--every machine that's
 running 5.3 for me.

OK, so why didn't you answer my question about it?

Kris


pgp80rVQLZo1N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: make index broken?

2004-12-07 Thread Kevin A. Pieckiel
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:54:48PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:17:46PM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
  On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:03:53AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
   Hmm.  Maybe you're using the wrong make program?
   What does which make tell you?
  
  /usr/bin/make
  
  The 'make fetchindex' is what I ultimately used, but I'd
  really like to know why this is broken.  It's broken on at
  least three machines that I know of--every machine that's
  running 5.3 for me.
 
 OK, so why didn't you answer my question about it?

Um, sorry, Kris, but I didn't see a question from you about this.
Lowell Gilbert asked which make I'm using, but other than that,
I've not seen any additional questions for me.

I apologize if I missed something.  Would you please repeat
your question for me?  I didn't mean to miss your response.

Kevin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: make index broken?

2004-12-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:51:44PM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:54:48PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
  On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:17:46PM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
   On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:03:53AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Hmm.  Maybe you're using the wrong make program?
What does which make tell you?
   
   /usr/bin/make
   
   The 'make fetchindex' is what I ultimately used, but I'd
   really like to know why this is broken.  It's broken on at
   least three machines that I know of--every machine that's
   running 5.3 for me.
  
  OK, so why didn't you answer my question about it?
 
 Um, sorry, Kris, but I didn't see a question from you about this.
 Lowell Gilbert asked which make I'm using, but other than that,
 I've not seen any additional questions for me.
 
 I apologize if I missed something.  Would you please repeat
 your question for me?  I didn't mean to miss your response.

I tried to redirect your email to the correct mailing list, but then
noticed that you removed yourself from the followup list, so I resent
it to you directly:

- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:04:46 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: make index broken?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:13:13PM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
 I'm running 5.3 on i386 (built from sources DL'ed via CVS on
 2 Dec 2004) and a ports tree (complete) that was downloaded via
 CVS on 2 Dec 2004.  My src tree is pulling from the RELENG_5
 tag and my ports tree is pulling from HEAD.  As of a fresh CVS
 of ports today (6 Dec 2004), I still cannot issue a 'make index'
 while in /usr/ports.  What am I doing wrong?  I keep getting the
 following error message (which I also got while running 5.2.1
 before upgrading to 5.3):

Well, one thing you're doing wrong is not following the clear,
explicit instructions given to you, which you quoted below.  But
anyway..what does 'make -V PHP_VERS' give you in that directory?

Kris

 Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..Makefile, line 34: warning: String 
 comparison operator should be either == or !=
 Makefile, line 34: Malformed conditional (defined(PHP_VERS)  ${PHP_VERS} 
  420)
 Makefile, line 34: Need an operator
 Makefile, line 36: if-less endif
 Makefile, line 36: Need an operator
 make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
 === databases/pear-DB_DataObject failed
 *** Error code 1
 1 error
 
 
 Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported
 version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you
 have a complete and up-to-date ports collection.  (INDEX builds are
 not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in
 particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all
 collection, and have no refuse files.)  If that is the case, then
 report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together with relevant
 details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version,
 your architecture, your environment, and your /etc/make.conf
 settings, especially compiler flags and WITH/WITHOUT settings).
 
 Note: the latest pre-generated version of INDEX may be fetched
 automatically with make fetchindex.
 
 
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/ports.
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/ports.
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



- End forwarded message -


pgpPVyhdhbTmZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: make index broken?

2004-12-06 Thread Subhro
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin A. Pieckiel
 Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 0:43
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: make index broken?
 
 I'm running 5.3 on i386 (built from sources DL'ed via CVS on
 2 Dec 2004) and a ports tree (complete) that was downloaded via
 CVS on 2 Dec 2004.  My src tree is pulling from the RELENG_5
 tag and my ports tree is pulling from HEAD.  As of a fresh CVS
 of ports today (6 Dec 2004), I still cannot issue a 'make index'
 while in /usr/ports.  What am I doing wrong?  I keep getting the
 following error message (which I also got while running 5.2.1
 before upgrading to 5.3):
 
 Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..Makefile, line 34: warning: String
 comparison operator should be either == or !=
 Makefile, line 34: Malformed conditional (defined(PHP_VERS) 
 ${PHP_VERS}  420)
 Makefile, line 34: Need an operator
 Makefile, line 36: if-less endif
 Makefile, line 36: Need an operator
 make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
 === databases/pear-DB_DataObject failed
 *** Error code 1
 1 error
 
 
 Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported
 version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you
 have a complete and up-to-date ports collection.  (INDEX builds are
 not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in
 particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all
 collection, and have no refuse files.)  If that is the case, then
 report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together with relevant
 details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version,
 your architecture, your environment, and your /etc/make.conf
 settings, especially compiler flags and WITH/WITHOUT settings).
 
 Note: the latest pre-generated version of INDEX may be fetched
 automatically with make fetchindex.
 
 
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/ports.
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/ports.


 Use make fetchindex instead

Regards
S.

Indian Institute of Information Technology
Subhro Sankha Kar
Block AQ-13/1, Sector V
Salt Lake City
PIN 700091
India


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: make index broken?

2002-12-24 Thread Kent Stewart
On Tuesday 24 December 2002 05:47 pm, Stacey Roberts wrote:
 Hello,
  I've just cvsup'd my ports tree.

 I portupgraded evolution and when that completed, I attempted to use
 make index (followed by pkgdb -Fv then portsdb -u). However, make
 index returns errors:
 snip
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11-fonts/mkbold
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11-fonts/mkitalic
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries
 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: *** Error code 1
 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry:
  Done.
 #

 Is this broken? I was able to run pkgdb -Fv successsfully, but

Definitely broken. It dies in ../lang/ruby.. and Mk/bsd.ruby.mk was 
modified by knu about 8 hours ago.

 portsdb -u returned:
 # portsdb -u
 [Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 3951
 port entries found /usr/ports/INDEX:1:Port info line must consist of
 10 fields.
 /usr/ports/INDEX:2:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
 /usr/ports/INDEX:3:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
 /usr/ports/INDEX:4:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
 .1000.2000.3000. . done]
 #

 Do I have to blast /usr/ports/* ..., again and rebuild ports tree?

No, I think the Mk file needs to be changed.

Kent


 Stacey

 Regards,

 Stacey

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message