Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)

2004-06-12 Thread Paulius Bulotas
Hello, On 04 06 12, horio shoichi wrote: > What is your /usr/X11R6/etc/xpdfrc like ? > > It seems a lot of lines necessary for font handling are commented out > in default install. well, /usr/X11R6/etc/xpdfrc is almost commented out, I copied it to ~/.xpdfrc, but option 'displayFontX' is not sup

Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)

2004-06-12 Thread Paulius Bulotas
Hello ;) On 04 06 12, Jonathan Chen wrote: > You need to install ghostscript fonts for it to display properly. > Easiest way to do this is to install print/ghostscript. > I've asked the xpdf maintainer to put in a note about this, but it's been > ignored... I forgot to mention, that I had ~/.xpdf

Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)

2004-06-11 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:08:46PM +0300, Paulius Bulotas wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to use native xpdf (compiled from ports) for viewing pdf > files, but it's almost impossible,, since for many pdf's it can't find > used fonts and of course doesn't show any text. > The question would be, wh

Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)

2004-06-11 Thread horio shoichi
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:08:46 +0300 Paulius Bulotas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to use native xpdf (compiled from ports) for viewing pdf > files, but it's almost impossible,, since for many pdf's it can't find > used fonts and of course doesn't show any text. > The question