On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 01:56:24AM -0500, parv wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Jez Hancock
thusly...
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:48:11PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
(something about increasing vi knowledge moving to vim or emacs)
The major benefits of vi over vim are multiple
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:48:11PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Hello. I have been using the vi that comes with FreeBSD for more than a
year. I now can manage to use lots of vi features except the tag mode which
I don't know clear about its concept (perhaps because of my bad English).
Now I
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Jez Hancock
thusly...
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 04:48:11PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
(something about increasing vi knowledge moving to vim or emacs)
The major benefits of vi over vim are multiple buffers and the concept
^^^
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
[ ... ]
Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig
into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many
programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe
none? Maybe many?
There are reasonable people who use
Zhang Weiwu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I advance to vim right now or emacs, or is it that I didn't dig
into vi deep enough to release its full power? I wonder how many
programmers are still using 4BSD vi (compare to enchanced vi's)? Maybe
none? Maybe many?
The vi in FreeBSD's base
