Re: ntpd question

2004-03-12 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:08:42AM -0800, Joshua Lokken wrote: > * Shaun T. Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 08:27]: > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > >Unfortuately if you're going to run ntpd, you can't get rid of these: > > >ntpd(8) will automatically bind to all interfaces on the system

Re: ntpd question

2004-03-12 Thread Joshua Lokken
* Shaun T. Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 08:27]: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >Unfortuately if you're going to run ntpd, you can't get rid of these: > >ntpd(8) will automatically bind to all interfaces on the system, and > >there are no controls within ntpd to control that. > > Darn. Th

Re: ntpd question

2004-03-10 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:53PM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > I run ntpd to keep my server's time in sync with a remote server. In my > "netstat -a" output, I see: > > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(stat

Re: ntpd question

2004-03-10 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Matthew Seaman wrote: Unfortuately if you're going to run ntpd, you can't get rid of these: ntpd(8) will automatically bind to all interfaces on the system, and there are no controls within ntpd to control that. Darn. Thanks for the suggestions! I was already controlling access to the port with m

Re: ntpd question

2004-03-10 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:49:53PM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > I run ntpd to keep my server's time in sync with a remote server. In my > "netstat -a" output, I see: > > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(stat