Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com writes:
David Arendt wrote:
Hi,
well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so
it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non
working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon
Hi,
When I did the test, I used FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 using the ports collection
delivered with this distribution.
Yesterday I did a checkout of the latest ports tree. I compiled bash,
xorg, xfce and gdm using the default options. When trying to login using
gdm, it still complains about a missing
David Arendt wrote:
Hi,
well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so
it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non
working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon
installing gdm and is dependencies from packages,
On 7/17/11, David Arendt ad...@prnet.org wrote:
When I did the test, I used FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 using the ports collection
delivered with this distribution.
I see. Since that time, there have been very few changes to the
version of the base system used to build the packages for 8, but more
to
On 16/07/2011 08:44, David Arendt wrote:
I want to compile packages from the ports collections with exactly the
same options that have been used to compile the official packages from
the official freebsd package collection. Is the var/db/ports directory
used to compile the official freebsd
Hi,
well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so
it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non
working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon
installing gdm and is dependencies from packages, everything worked
correctly.
I want to compile packages from the ports collections with exactly the
same options that have been used to compile the official packages from
the official freebsd package collection. Is the var/db/ports directory
used to compile the official freebsd package collection available
somewhere ? If
well I don't actually now which package it was, but I compiled gdm (so
it should be one of it's dependencies). A compilation resulted in a non
working gdm (something with pam support not found on execution). Upon
installing gdm and is dependencies from packages, everything worked
correctly.