[SOLVED] Re: pkgdb problem after portupgrade - operation not permitted

2006-06-19 Thread Max Belushkin
Andrey Slusar wrote: Now portupgarde is back to stable 2.1.1 version. Update you ports tree. Thank you, this solved the problem. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe

Re: pkgdb problem after portupgrade - operation not permitted

2006-06-19 Thread Andrey Slusar
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:29:17 +0200, Max Belushkin wrote: > I just portupgrade'd portupgrade on a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE to > portupgrade 2.0.1 (2006/06/18), and right after this pkgdb fails on > all operations, i.e.: > pkgdb -fu > [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 63 > packages found (-0 +63)

Re: pkgdb problem [solved]

2005-06-06 Thread Vizion
On Monday 06 June 2005 19:20, the author Vizion contributed to the dialogue on- Re: pkgdb problem [maybe good news]: > >Thank you so much for all your warmth and the generosity with which you > share your time OK its done and rebuilt -- thank heavens for my forgotten critical file

Re: pkgdb problem [maybe good news]

2005-06-06 Thread Vizion
On Monday 06 June 2005 18:24, the author Vizion contributed to the dialogue on- Re: pkgdb problem: >> >>Feed it to portinstall to reinstall all of the ports. > >Sounds like a long process and a sledge hammer to crack a nut - but I guess > if one has no other tool a sledg

Re: pkgdb problem

2005-06-06 Thread Vizion
On Monday 06 June 2005 18:21, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to the dialogue on- Re: pkgdb problem: >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:30:01PM -0700, Vizion wrote: >> On Monday 06 June 2005 15:32, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to the >> dialogue on- >> >> Re

Re: pkgdb problem

2005-06-06 Thread Vizion
On Monday 06 June 2005 17:30, the author Vizion contributed to the dialogue on- Re: pkgdb problem: >On Monday 06 June 2005 15:32, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to the >dialogue on- > > Re: pkgdb problem: >>On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Vizion wrote

Re: pkgdb problem

2005-06-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:30:01PM -0700, Vizion wrote: > On Monday 06 June 2005 15:32, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to the > dialogue on- > Re: pkgdb problem: > > >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Vizion wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I

Re: pkgdb problem

2005-06-06 Thread Vizion
On Monday 06 June 2005 15:32, the author Kris Kennaway contributed to the dialogue on- Re: pkgdb problem: >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Vizion wrote: >> Hi >> >> I managed to get my pkgdb entirely screwed up - and there is now no >> database. >>

Re: pkgdb problem

2005-06-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:14:16PM -0700, Vizion wrote: > Hi > > I managed to get my pkgdb entirely screwed up - and there is now no database. > > I tried pkgdb -fu > And was told there were 0 pkgs! > > How do I rebuild from scratch? If you accidentally delete your /var/db/pkg directory then t

Re: pkgdb problem!

2004-03-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:39:37PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi BSDers, I run pkgdb -F and get this: > > ---> Checking the package registry database > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 433 packages > found (-21 +58) (...)Cannot allocate memory: Cannot update the pkgdb!] > > never has

Re: pkgdb problem!

2004-03-03 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:39:37 -0500 (EST) Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi BSDers, I run pkgdb -F and get this: > > ---> Checking the package registry database > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 433 packages > found (-21 +58) (...)Cannot allocate memory: Cannot update the pkg

Re: Pkgdb Problem -- /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in

2004-02-28 Thread Bob Perry
Sorry for being so thick, but I get more than just nervous when using the delete command. Do I understand you correctly in that I delete, as in rm, the portupgrade files in /usr/ports/sysutils/ directory and also all of the ruby files in the /usr/ports/ lang/ directory? No, you can pkg_del

Re: Pkgdb Problem -- /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in

2004-02-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 03:54:09PM -0500, Bob Perry wrote: > Sorry for being so thick, but I get more than just nervous when using > the delete > command. Do I understand you correctly in that I delete, as in rm, the > portupgrade > files in /usr/ports/sysutils/ directory and also all of the rub

Re: Pkgdb Problem -- /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in

2004-02-28 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 28 February 2004 12:54 pm, Bob Perry wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > >On Saturday 28 February 2004 11:53 am, Bob Perry wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>I run FreeBSD 4.9 and just ran my weekly CVSup followed by portsdb > >>-uU and portupgrade -arR. I came across the following message > >> whi

Re: Pkgdb Problem -- /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in

2004-02-28 Thread Bob Perry
Kent Stewart wrote: On Saturday 28 February 2004 11:53 am, Bob Perry wrote: Hello, I run FreeBSD 4.9 and just ran my weekly CVSup followed by portsdb -uU and portupgrade -arR. I came across the following message which looks similar to one previously posted today. I'm relatively new at this a

Re: Pkgdb Problem -- /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in

2004-02-28 Thread Rilindo Foster
I had that a similiar problem - it broken portversion. I went and reinstalled it from the ports and everything is well again - you might need to do the same as well. -- - Rilindo Foster http://monzell.com AIM: rilindo ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: Pkgdb Problem -- /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:35:in

2004-02-28 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 28 February 2004 11:53 am, Bob Perry wrote: > Hello, > > I run FreeBSD 4.9 and just ran my weekly CVSup followed by portsdb > -uU and portupgrade -arR. I came across the following message which > looks similar to one previously posted today. I'm relatively new at > this and just quest

Re: pkgdb problem

2004-02-28 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 28 February 2004 02:27 am, DanGer wrote: > i have just upgraded ruby 1.8 and i wanted to run pkgdb and i get > this: > > ===> Registering installation for ruby-1.8.1_2 > ===> SECURITY REPORT: > This port has installed the following files which may act as > network servers and ma