Re: portmanager port upgrade question

2006-09-05 Thread Gerard Seibert
Boris Samorodov wrote:

  Can anyon tell me why this port is marked ignore? Has it been superseeded?
 
 You may consider reading /usr/ports/UPDATING.
 
 BTW, it's the right file to read from time to time and especially if
 you have questions about the port system. ;-)

The info you are searching for is in the file under the: 20060616 date
tag.

Personally, why a new source was not created so that anyone downloading
FreeBSD, and conversely not familiar with its workings, would not have
to go through this rigmarole is beyond me. If they wanted to keep a
clearly obsolete version around for what ever reason it should have been
so marked as such. For someone doing a fresh install, there is no reason
to go this route, IMHO.


-- 
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portmanager port upgrade question

2006-09-05 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 05:56:03 -0400 Gerard Seibert wrote:
 Boris Samorodov wrote:

   Can anyon tell me why this port is marked ignore? Has it been superseeded?
  
  You may consider reading /usr/ports/UPDATING.
  
  BTW, it's the right file to read from time to time and especially if
  you have questions about the port system. ;-)

 The info you are searching for is in the file under the: 20060616 date
 tag.

Yes.

 Personally, why a new source was not created so that anyone downloading

Which type of source are you speaking of?

 FreeBSD, and conversely not familiar with its workings, would not have
 to go through this rigmarole is beyond me. If they wanted to keep a
 clearly obsolete version around for what ever reason it should have been
 so marked as such.

If you meen linux_base-8 than it is marked as DEPRECATED and an
EXPIRATION_DATE is set.

 For someone doing a fresh install, there is no reason
 to go this route, IMHO.

The default port now is linux_base-fc4 and if someone tries to install
any linux application from a portstree then the right linux port is
installed. And yes, the portstree should be up ta date (note the
system the OP asked was a fresh install as of two weeks ago).


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portmanager port upgrade question

2006-09-05 Thread Gerard Seibert
Boris Samorodov wrote:

  Personally, why a new source was not created so that anyone downloading
 
 Which type of source are you speaking of?

When a new, or not, user downloads an image file for FBSD, he/she is
getting an image file with this obsoleted version. They must then use
'portupgrade' to change the obsoleted 'linux_base-8' to the newer
version.

This could easily have been avoided by issuing a newer mirror version. I
cannot see any reason why this is not feasible.


-- 
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portmanager port upgrade question

2006-09-04 Thread Alistair Sutton

On 04/09/06, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm trying to upgrade a machine, which was built only about 2 weeks agao.
portmanager reprts the following:


portmanager 0.4.1_6
FreeBSD brown.fas.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #11: Sun Sep  3
13:33:28 EDT 2006
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BROWN  i386
 
 autoConflicts  0  autoMoved  0
 backUp 0  buildDependsAreLeaves  0
 forced 0  interactive0
 log1  pmMode 0
 pristine   0  resume 0
 
 Mon Sep  4 17:31:36 2006
  linux_base-8-8.0_16 /emulators/linux_base-8
  marked IGNORE
  port not installed/updated

  Mon Sep  4 17:31:37 2006
  linux_base-8-8.0_16
  /emulators/linux_base-8
  marked IGNORE
  por t not installed/updated


Can anyon tell me why this port is marked ignore? Has it been superseeded?



From the port's Makefile:


DEPRECATED= unsupported by upstream, no security support anymore
EXPIRATION_DATE=2006-09-01
IGNORE= ${DEPRECATED}

Al
--
WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk
GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: portmanager port upgrade question

2006-09-04 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:44:43 -0400 stan wrote:

 I'm trying to upgrade a machine, which was built only about 2 weeks agao.

Seems that either you didn't upgrade the portstree or installed a
deprecated linux_base port by hands.

   linux_base-8-8.0_16 /emulators/linux_base-8
   marked IGNORE
   port not installed/updated

 Can anyon tell me why this port is marked ignore? Has it been superseeded?

You may consider reading /usr/ports/UPDATING.

BTW, it's the right file to read from time to time and especially if
you have questions about the port system. ;-)


WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]