Re: replacement for byteorder.h ? (re olvwm(1))

2003-01-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-09 10:12:05 -0800:
 I'm trying to compile olvwm(1), v4.4, for FreeBSD 4.6 on an i386
 box.

I don't use olvwm so this might not be feasible, but are you of
/usr/ports/x11-wm/olvwm ? It seems to have built just fine here.
It's 4.2, that's why I say you might not want to use it...

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: replacement for byteorder.h ? (re olvwm(1))

2003-01-10 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 17:59:01 +0100:
 # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-09 10:12:05 -0800:
  I'm trying to compile olvwm(1), v4.4, for FreeBSD 4.6 on an i386
  box.
 
 I don't use olvwm so this might not be feasible, but are you of

s/you of/you aware of/

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: replacement for byteorder.h ? (re olvwm(1))

2003-01-09 Thread richard childers / kg6hac
As is so often the case, articulating the problem led to a
resolution; it looks like linking sys/byteorder.h to machine/endian.h
is an effective workaround.

Still working on olvwm, though; it complains, now, about conflicting
definitions of sys_errlist[] and wchar_t ... aiyah.

Hope this helps someone else, down the line.


-- richard


richard childers / kg6hac wrote:

 I'm trying to compile olvwm(1), v4.4, for FreeBSD 4.6 on an i386
 box.

 It's looking for sys/byteorder.h and not finding it.

 My research indicates that linking sys/byteorder.h to
 netinet/in.h doesn't work. (It was a workaround suggested on one
 of the URLs I read.)

 I understand the issues being addressed here - they are
 fundamental, big-endian versus little-endian architectures.
 However, I do not normally have the time and leisure to explore
 such interesting topics (unemployment, properly treated, can be
 the equivalent of what, in more scholastic environments, are
 referred to as 'going on sabbatical' :-); I am trying to make
 effective use of this precious period of free study.

 For what it's worth, xview and xview-ports are both installed
 without problems; I have olwm(1), I just want olvwm(1), it's my
 preferred 'vwm, very useful for keeping work segmented onto
 different desktops according to system or window role
 (development servers on *this* desktop, production servers on
 *that* desktop, network analysis tools on *these* three desktops,
 email over here, and HTTP clients on these four desktops at the
 bottom, for instance - stretch as needed).

 I'm going to use my buddy find(1) to search for files containing
 strings referencing 'endian' and ending in '.h' (or '.c', to see
 what's being included, if my first efforts fail), and I haven't
 given up on figuring this out myself, but thought I'd inquire of
 others whom might face these issues on a daily, rather than
 decade-periodic, basis, in the hopes that I'd save myself a few
 hours (or days), and maybe learn something, too.

 Thanks in advance,

 -- richard


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message