Gary Kline wrote:
Somebody in the UK turned the perl regex stuff into a ch
library. IMHO, nobody can touch perl's regex ... so it
would be nice to have in the C world.
AFAIK regex is going to be in the upcoming C++ standard; for now you can
get it with add-on libraries.
I guess
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 15:34 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
Somebody in the UK turned the perl regex stuff into a ch
library. IMHO, nobody can touch perl's regex ... so it
would be nice to have in the C world. There are other
perl features that would serve if they were
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:35:03AM +0200, Arne Skjaerholt wrote:
Getting at argv/argc is actually pretty simple in Perl. The global array
@ARGV contains the arguments given on the command-line, but not the name
of the file (this datum is contained in $0). Therefore your argv[1] in C
is
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 14:54 +0400, Igor Robul wrote:
Except there is one big drawback for me (I'm not Perl-guru :-) ):
If there are some file names on command line of perl-script, then perl
redirects stdout to read from these files, which makes impossible to
read from real stdout. At least
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:51:37AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
Somebody in the UK turned the perl regex stuff into a ch
library. IMHO, nobody can touch perl's regex ... so it
would be nice to have in the C world.
AFAIK regex is going to be in the
On 4/28/06, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I recall reading about C# is that it was
a DOS/Win C++ ish language.
There's more to it than that, and not really DOS, it's a fairly new fully
object oriented alternative to languages like Java. Not that it's
Gary Kline wrote:
I am NOT trying to start any kind of flame debate, but would
like to know what real advantage perl has over the newer
so-called all-in-one language, ch. (Other than the obvious
fact that there are literally billions of lines of perl existant.)
I don't
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:10:43AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-04-26 19:41, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi People,
I am NOT trying to start any kind of flame debate, but would
like to know what real advantage perl has over the newer
so-called all-in-one language, ch.
On 2006-04-27 14:48, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:10:43AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Don't you really mean ``C#'' by writing ``ch''?
The only thing I recall reading about C# is that it was
a DOS/Win C++ ish language. ch is a C/C++ scripting language
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:48 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
I like the C main(int argc, char *argv[]) intro or
starting-point. main() has to be there in C. Given argc
and argv, I can hack away freely. /bin/sh, /bin/csh,
and perl's lack if arg[cv] means that I have to think
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:21:53AM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
I am NOT trying to start any kind of flame debate, but would
like to know what real advantage perl has over the newer
so-called all-in-one language, ch. (Other than the obvious
fact that
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:15:34AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-04-27 14:48, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:10:43AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Don't you really mean ``C#'' by writing ``ch''?
The only thing I recall reading about C# is that
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:35:03AM +0200, Arne Skjaerholt wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:48 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
I like the C main(int argc, char *argv[]) intro or
starting-point. main() has to be there in C. Given argc
and argv, I can hack away freely. /bin/sh,
To get back to the original question, I think there's one crucial part:
libraries. Or modules, or function sets or whatever they're called in [ pick
language ] sphere.
It's the extra stuff that you can easily add or import which makes a language
worth while, whether it's interpreted or not.
On 2006-04-27 16:58, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting at argv/argc is actually pretty simple in Perl. The global array
@ARGV contains the arguments given on the command-line, but not the name
of the file (this datum is contained in $0). Therefore your argv[1] in C
is $ARGV[0] in
On 2006-04-26 19:41, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi People,
I am NOT trying to start any kind of flame debate, but would
like to know what real advantage perl has over the newer
so-called all-in-one language, ch. (Other than the obvious
fact that there are literally billions of
16 matches
Mail list logo
