On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 02:00:36PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:32:51PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> > > is there any connection to fsck not be able to run when
> > > I am at security level 3 under 5.2.1?
> > >
> > > That see
At 01:00 PM 06/04/2004, Bill Moran wrote:
What about 5's background fsck? Is that set up so it's able to run after
the securelevel has been raised? Background fsck seems to wait a minute or
so for the machine to boot before it starts.
that was sorta my question too. I do see it run LATER after bo
Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:32:51PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> > is there any connection to fsck not be able to run when
> > I am at security level 3 under 5.2.1?
> >
> > That seems odd, but sure seems to be the case.
>
> That sounds very likely. I wo
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:32:51PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> is there any connection to fsck not be able to run when
> I am at security level 3 under 5.2.1?
>
> That seems odd, but sure seems to be the case.
That sounds very likely. I would imagine that fsck needs write access
to the raw disk
