Re: select(2)'s timeout argument

[Mikhail Teterin]

=On Jun 29, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
=
=> Why is the pointer to the `struct timeval' not declared as `const'?
=> Can select(2) ever modify the structure pointed to? Thanks!

Thank you very much, Lance, for the quick response!

=Some versions of Linux modified timeval. Posix.1g specifies const
=qualifier. I think most unixes don't modify it. I think ?? in the old
=days some unixes did modify it. legacy and compatibility issues.

If Posix.1g specifies const-ness and we don't, in fact, modify it, is
it a bug, we don't declare it const?

-mi

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: select(2)'s timeout argument

[lbland]

On Jun 29, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Why is the pointer to the `struct timeval' not declared as `const'?
Can select(2) ever modify the structure pointed to? Thanks!
hi-
Some versions of Linux modified timeval. Posix.1g specifies const 
qualifier. I think most unixes don't modify it. I think ?? in the old 
days some unixes did modify it. legacy and compatibility issues.

thanks!-
-lance
Lance Bland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VVI
Mac OS X Charting
http://www.vvi.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"