On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able
to figure out how to turn
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 26/04/2013 16:51, jflowers wrote:
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no
sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp
which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I
On 27/04/2013 17:43, doug wrote:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E')
If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
who can reach that port.
You see where it says 'M=E' in that DAEMON_OPTIONS line? That should
probably be changed to
2013-04-27 18:43, doug skrev:
If sendmail is listening on port 587, it will relay for any valid sender
who can reach that port.
Only if it is listed in /etc/mail/access file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
Switching to postfix and editing mynetworks in main.cf might be simplest
solution.
Peter
___
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Zyumbilev, Peter
pe...@aboutsupport.com wrote:
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
Switching to postfix and editing mynetworks in main.cf
2013-02-14 03:07, Chris Maness skrev:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Zyumbilev, Peter
pe...@aboutsupport.com wrote:
On 13/02/2013 09:50, Bernt Hansson wrote:
dnl define(`SMART_HOST', `your.isp.mail.server')
on your intranet machine and put in your inet machine name.
That looks like
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access to the i-net. I think I remember reading that it is
possible for the i-net attached sendmail
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robison, Dave
david.robi...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet. It does
not have access to the i-net.
2013-02-13 06:30, Chris Maness skrev:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robison, Dave
david.robi...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:54, Chris Maness wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box running sendmail that can see the whole internet.
I have another mail server that hosts mail for an intranet.
Progress has been made.
After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
accepting connections, but maillog is still full of:
jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r05KsfdB048780: smtpquit: mailer
On 1/8/2013 2:04 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
WHAT HAPPENS when you 'telnet' to your mailserver port(s) and try
doing smtp transaction(s) manually?
I don't get the SMTP prompt.
Insufficient data
a) does telnet say connected?
Yes.
b) if yes, how long did you wait for the
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:30:01 -0500,
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com said:
R After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
R However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
R accepting connections, but maillog is still full of:
R jerusalem
Karl Vogel writes:
R After looking into several things, I can now send mail successfully.
R However, delivery to local mailboxes is still blocked. sm-mta reports
R accepting connections, but maillog is still full of:
R jerusalem sm-mta[28896]: r05KsfdB048780: smtpquit: mailer local
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jan 10 17:04:06 2013
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:00:42 -0500
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sendmail not working
Karl Vogel writes:
R After looking into several things, I can now send mail
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the cyrus-sasl port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way. /var/log/maillog
has this:
Jan 7 21:07:42 jerusalem sm-mta[69792]:
On 08.01.2013 07:39, Robert Huff wrote:
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the
cyrus-sasl port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way.
/var/log/maillog has this:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 8 07:43:00 2013
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:39:39 -0500
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, free...@dreamchaser.org,
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Subject: Re: sendmail not working
On 1/7/2013 11:48 PM
On 1/8/2013 9:18 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the
cyrus-sasl port. Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either
way. /var/log/maillog has this:
No clue, except the first message might be saying it's not going to
honor
On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
WHAT HAPPENS when you 'telnet' to your mailserver port(s) and try
doing smtp transaction(s) manually?
I don't get the SMTP prompt.
OK, so sendmail either isn't starting, isn't binding to port 25, or some sort
of network/firewall issue
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Jan 8 11:12:57 2013
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:09:36 -0500
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Subject: Re: sendmail not working
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 1/8/2013 9:18 AM, Robert Bonomi
On 01/07/13 19:45, Robert Huff wrote:
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012 amd64
I have compiled sendmail following the instructions in the cyrus-sasl
port.
Sendmail starts, but no mail is processed either way. /var/log/maillog
[ Gary Aitken wrote on Wed 29.Aug'12 at 1:45:19 -0600 ]
Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the
local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file,
and it doesn't seem to cause errors; but neither does ';' or '%' so I'm
guessing the lines are
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:19 -0600
From: Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org
Subject: sendmail local-host-names questions
Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the
local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, and
it doesn't seem to
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask?
It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a domain
specified with a trailing dot, since I thought that was how one specified a
fully qualified domain
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I
have is that neither clamav or
[ Andrea Venturoli wrote on Tue 14.Aug'12 at 10:22:14 +0200 ]
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote:
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012
r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav +
the above). At least, that's how I do it.
or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and
implement content filters.
depends of who is talking and how easiness is defined.
Postfix is different. That's all.
___
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 21:55:24 2012
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: AN a...@neu.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
From: Mark Felder f...@feld.me
Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
When you
On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base system. What is
the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
Sendmail?
You don't need to remove the base system sendmail. All you need to do
is set up /etc/mail/mailer.conf
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
During subsequent system upgrades, of you build from source, you should
watch out for thus during the mergemaster piece.
Brian
On Jun 22, 2012 11:44 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22/06/2012 19:19, Walter Hurry wrote:
It seems that Sendmail is embedded somehow in the base
Hi--
On Jun 22, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
and use, and the second is
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
Thanks! (Thanks too to the other responders.)
Looks like
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
From: Mark Felder f...@feld.me
Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:49:43 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
If I leave the root exposed, the From
field looks e.g. r...@mech-anton240.men.bris.ac.uk,
which is rejected by the university mailer,
because it has no knowledge of this address.
You should be able to use sendmail's masquerading
On 12/04/2012 02:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write
to queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25):
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:17:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/04/2012 02:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write
to queue
You should not be changing the ownership and permissions on any of the
directories used by sendmail(8), or the group membership of any of the
groups used by sendmail. Not even if you think you know what you are
doing. This is extremely security sensitive, and getting it wrong means
at minimum
On 12/04/2012 14:40, Ian Lord wrote:
What are the permissions on /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail ? They should
look like this:
% ls -la /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
-r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 662136 Apr 1 08:38
/usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
# ls -al /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:57:51 +, Ian Lord wrote:
I then got a different error in /var/log/messages
Apr 11 19:38:40 dev sendmail[41170]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(www): can not write to
queue directory /var/spool/clientmqueue/ (RunAsGid=0, required=25):
Permission denied
I found very old threads
On 11/18/11 00:12, Matthias Apitz wrote:
STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1blu.de., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL
se below; what does the FAIL means exactly?
I have been reading on the subject and it appears you do not trust
the certificate
issuer for smtp.lblu.de.
On 18/11/2011 10:00, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/18/11 00:12, Matthias Apitz wrote:
STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.1blu.de., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL
se below; what does the FAIL means exactly?
I have been reading on the subject and it appears you do not trust
the certificate
--- On Thu, 7/21/11, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
From: Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se
Subject: Re: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25
To: ssgriffonuser ssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 3:31 AM
2011-07-20 06
On 07/23/11 13:51, Bill Tillman wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/21/11, Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
From: Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se
Subject: Re: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25
To: ssgriffonuserssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Cc:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:03:26 -0700
From: ssgriffonuser ssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25 (solved)
[[.. sneck ..]]
However, I also learned that my home ISP blocks outbound
traffic on port 25 (I thought it only blocked
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:34:26 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
ssgriffonuser writes:
My isp is blocking outgoing traffic on port 25.
Yeah, it looks like your right. I never would've considered my ISP
blocking outbound traffic from my home, but I suppose it makes
sense.
Does _not_
2011-07-20 06:24, ssgriffonuser skrev:
I still can't telnet in from an external network.
To me, that sounds like your external network might be blocking outgoing
traffic on port 25.
Can you connect to any other mailservers on port 25?
%telnet gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 25
Trying
On 07/21/11 01:31, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2011-07-20 06:24, ssgriffonuser skrev:
I still can't telnet in from an external network.
To me, that sounds like your external network might be blocking
outgoing traffic on port 25.
Can you connect to any other mailservers on port 25?
%telnet
ssgriffonuser writes:
My isp is blocking outgoing traffic on port 25.
Yeah, it looks like your right. I never would've considered my ISP
blocking outbound traffic from my home, but I suppose it makes
sense.
It is my understanding many I.S.P.s in the U,S, do, as part of
spam
On 07/19/11 09:31, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:03:58 -0700
From: ssgriffonuserssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Subject: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server. I can send
and receive to localhost and I can
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:03:58 -0700, ssgriffonuser wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server. I can send
and receive to localhost and I can send to external networks but I can
not receive from external networks (I receive a 550: Address rejected).
Netstat
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:03:58 -0700
From: ssgriffonuser ssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Subject: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server. I can send
and receive to localhost and I can send to external networks but I can
From: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; ssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 12:31:56 PM
Subject: Re: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:03:58 -0700
From: ssgriffonuser
ssgriffonuser ssgriffonu...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server. I can
send and receive to localhost and I can send to external networks but
I can not receive from external networks (I receive a 550: Address
rejected). Netstat says sendmail is
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 04:27:14PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
ssgriffonuser ssgriffonu...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server. I can
send and receive to localhost and I can send to external networks but
I can not receive from external networks
2011-07-19 09:03, ssgriffonuser skrev:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server. I can send
and receive to localhost and I can send to external networks but I can
not receive from external networks (I receive a 550: Address rejected).
Netstat says sendmail is listening
On 06/01/2011 17:04, Lydia Rowe wrote:
cannot save rejected email anywhere
savemail panics occur when sendmail is unable to deliver a bounced
message to the postmaster alias.
(from googling :)
http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/savemail_panic_in_Sendmail.html
--
-
Lydia Rowe wrote:
Hi!
I'm encountering this most curious error on a fairly new FreeBSD 8
machine and I'm just not sure where to go with this.
The Error:
Jan 6 12:56:31 sendmail[1600]: p06HuRGB001600:
Losing ./qfp06HuRGB001600: savemail panic
Jan 6 12:56:31 sendmail[1600]:
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 17:47 +, Paul Macdonald wrote:
On 06/01/2011 17:04, Lydia Rowe wrote:
cannot save rejected email anywhere
savemail panics occur when sendmail is unable to deliver a bounced
message to the postmaster alias.
(from googling :)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Gabor Illo stagel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
My problem: sendmail skipping /etc/host and use MX record. Somebody
have any ide how use sendmail /etc/host file?
Dec 9 20:58:23 www sm-mta[29438]: oB9Fxmx0027174:
to=sdg...@sdaffd.hu, delay=03:58:35,
On 29/10/2010 14:49, Christopher Illies wrote:
...
Ok, when I use telnet, this happens:
telnet send.ki.se 587
Trying 130.xxx.xxx.26...
Connected to send.ki.se.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 KIMSX09.user.ki.se Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Fri, 29 Oct
2010 14:55:51 +0200
EHLO
GSSAPI is the Generic Security Services Application Program Interface
and NTLM is NT Lan Manager -- they are both authentication systems
popular amongst various generations of Microsoft OSes. GSSAPI is
actually based on that old Unix stalwart: Kerberos, and hence is also
fairly popular amongst
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org]
On Behalf Of Vincent Hoffman [vi...@unsane.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:22 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail as client via smarthost
On 29/10/2010 11:19, Christopher Illies wrote:
I added U:smmsp and M:PLAIN to my /etc/mail/auth/client-info file, but
that did not change anything. When I left out the square brackets around the
server name in that file, I got another error message in /val/log/maillog:
Oct 29 12:05:22 muck
Thanks for your explanations, Vince. It got me one step further (I think).
...
PLAIN mechanism mean that i'm sending the password/user in plain rather
than using something like DIGEST-MD5 or any of the other possible
mechanisms that can be listed in confAUTH_MECHANISMS in your sendmail
.mc file
On 29/10/2010 14:49, Christopher Illies wrote:
Although I have no idea what GSSAPI and NTLM are, I remembered that I have
seen these abbreviations before: NTLM is an OPTION for cyrus-sasl2, and yes,
it is compiled in (WITH_NTLM=true). And GSSAPI appeared first in the mc file:
GSSAPI is the
On 29/10/2010 14:49, Christopher Illies wrote:
Thanks for your explanations, Vince. It got me one step further (I think).
...
Ok, when I use telnet, this happens:
telnet send.ki.se 587
Trying 130.xxx.xxx.26...
Connected to send.ki.se.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 KIMSX09.user.ki.se
2010-10-28 14:49, Christopher Illies:
To send email from my computer at work I need to send through a
smarthost. In the past I had added the line:
define(`SMART_HOST', `[smpt.ki.se]')
Brackets are only needed for ipaddresses.
What happens when you remove the brackets, like so
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:49 +0200, Christopher Illies wrote:
snip
Not knowing much about sendmail, I tried google and more or less
blindly followed suggestions. Here is what I have done so far, but
sending email still does not work:
1. recompiled sendmail with sasl by adding the following
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:49 +0200, Christopher Illies wrote:
snip
define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `EXTERNAL GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
LOGIN PLAIN')dnl FEATURE(`authinfo',`hash /etc/mail/auth/client-info')dnl
dnl Set port define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `IPC $h 587')
I can't speak to the validity
On 28/10/2010 15:25, Christopher Illies wrote:
2010-10-28 14:49, Christopher Illies:
To send email from my computer at work I need to send through a
smarthost. In the past I had added the line:
define(`SMART_HOST', `[smpt.ki.se]')
Brackets are only needed for ipaddresses.
What happens when
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:51:59 -0500, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote:
A bit OT, but I'm hoping one of you resident geniuses can point me to
an answer
I have a situation where I need to set up round-robin across several
smart hosts in the sendmail mailertable for all traffic. (For
On 10/27/2010 3:26 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:51:59 -0500, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
wrote:
A bit OT, but I'm hoping one of you resident geniuses can point me to
an answer
I have a situation where I need to set up round-robin across several
smart hosts
Hello,
When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in
resolv.conf during the live, for example:
boot time: no network available
start of PPP over UMTS: resolv.conf from provider
start VPN to connect to company: resolv.conf from company
...
it seems that sendmail is
El día Tuesday, September 14, 2010 a las 09:15:49AM +0100, tomasz dereszynski
escribió:
Hello,
When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in
resolv.conf during the live, for example:
boot time: no network available
start of PPP over UMTS: resolv.conf from
El día Tuesday, September 14, 2010 a las 09:15:49AM +0100, tomasz
dereszynski escribió:
Hello,
When using a laptop it is normal that there are some changes in
resolv.conf during the live, for example:
boot time: no network available
start of PPP over UMTS: resolv.conf from
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of tomasz dereszynski
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:28 AM
To: Matthias Apitz; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sendmail resolv.conf changes
El
El día Tuesday, September 14, 2010 a las 05:49:07PM +0200, Terrence Koeman
escribió:
What I wanted to say: sendmail runs and DHCP changes in certain
situations the IP, routing and DNS, and sendmail does not adopt on
these
changes.
It might be an idea to (mis)use the script option
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 325, Issue 5, Message: 4
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:06:33 +0100 Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for posting on a bsd list but i figure there's more than a few
sendmail experts here.
I would like to run reverse dns checks on one of my
In the last episode (Aug 18), David Allen said:
I've had the following setup at home for a number of years:
mailhub smarthost --- intarwebs
Everything works as intended, of course, but I'd like to change the setup
to accomodate the mailhub host being powered off at night. After
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 16:12:36, J wrote:
I'd like to set up Sendmail to facilitate e-mail (with attached jpeg)
delivery to an internet account from my wireless IP camera. That's
all I want it to do, nothing more. I've been a very satisfied
FreeBSD user
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, J wrote:
I'd like to set up Sendmail to facilitate e-mail (with attached jpeg) delivery
to an internet account from my wireless IP
camera. That's all I want it to do, nothing more. I've been a very satisfied
FreeBSD user for a few
years and am reasonably comfortable
On 28/06/2010 23:21, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:12:38 +0100, Michaelmlmichae...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but I don't quite understand why. It's my laptop system and I don't
really need or want sendmail there.
You may want to reconsider this statement. :-)
I did just that :) So
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:51:46 +0100, Michael mlmichae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
My console is being flooded with this kind of messages:
Jun 28 15:49:02 prime sendmail[57268]: My unqualified host name
(localhost) unknown; sleeping for retry
Jun 28 15:49:06 prime sendmail[21451]: unable to
On 28/06/2010 22:43, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:51:46 +0100, Michaelmlmichae...@gmail.com wrote:
My console is being flooded with this kind of messages:
Jun 28 15:49:02 prime sendmail[57268]: My unqualified host name
(localhost) unknown; sleeping for retry
Jun 28 15:49:06 prime
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:12:38 +0100, Michael mlmichae...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but I don't quite understand why. It's my laptop system and I don't
really need or want sendmail there.
You may want to reconsider this statement. :-)
I guess it must be some script
trying to send email instead
On 6/28/10 6:21 PM, Polytropon wrote:
But how can I find out exactly what is trying to use sendmail (which
fails and complaints)?
I think it's sendmail itself that complains on startup (running as
local-only delivery system).
That's certainly what it looks like.
The only
change
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, kalin m ka...@el.net wrote:
hi all...
reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html
i did get an access file set up. it doesn't do anything thought...
i have only entry like this:
some.domain.com OK
and did
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:46:24 -0400 Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 11:49 AM, David Allen wrote:
On 4/2/10, Jon Radelj...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
[much stuff deleted --SB]
Interesting reading. Thanks for elaborating.
So the IDENT protocol
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk writes:
Ident queries like this will cause a delay if the other side
doesn't respond respond to the ident query ...
I consider it polite for firewalls to actively refuse to open
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2010 01:51:27, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to sendmail
from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail
On 4/1/10, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/04/2010 01:51:27, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to sendmail
from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail delays five seconds
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT query.
If he had local DNS configured, there would
On April 2, 2010, Jon Radel wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT query.
On 4/2/10, Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT query.
On 4/2/10 11:49 AM, David Allen wrote:
On 4/2/10, Jon Radelj...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2010 15:12:33, Jon Radel wrote:
This is why there's a school of thought that even if your default for
firewall configuration is to quietly drop unwanted packets, IDENT is a
protocol that you should actively reject. It makes things move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2010 13:33:09, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT
1 - 100 of 1101 matches
Mail list logo
