Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra elements
at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix.
I'm pretty sure that
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Let me be sure I understand you correctly.
Your saying you tested the NetBSD version of mtree that was committed
into 10.0 head and it also has the bug we found?
No. The port is not complete. All I did was a code inspection.
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
This fixes the problem that was bothering you, but the interactions of
different features are complicated, and many of them are documented in
fairly loose language.
Is that the diplomatic way of saying the manpage for mtree sucks,
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
This fixes the problem that was bothering you, but the interactions of
different features are complicated, and many of them are documented in
fairly loose language.
Is that the diplomatic way of saying the
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra elements
at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix.
I'm pretty sure that the fix is just to set
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra elements
at all. Now I
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:30:49 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
I can not get the return code from mtree to control
the displaying of a error message.
The mtree at the end of the script does function correctly
because I can tell
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
So the question remains, why is mtree giving a return of zero when it
finds directories on the target that are not in the spec file?
Okay, I had a hard time figuring out your examples, but I think I've got
an independent repeatable test case for the problem.
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
and I think the problem you're having is that the second echo $?
should be 2, although the others are correct at 0. Is that correct?
It's not; ignore my example. The extra directory was under the ignored
directory, so it's testing
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
It's not; ignore my example. The extra directory was under the ignored
directory, so it's testing the right properties. I think if I create the
new subdirectory under the other main directory, it would be right.
Confirmed. The
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra elements
at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix.
I'm pretty sure that the fix is just to set rval on jumping to the
extra tag in vwalk() in
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra elements
at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix.
I'm pretty sure that the fix is just to set rval on jumping to the
extra tag in
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes:
I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover extra elements
at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix.
I'm
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:30:49 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
I can not get the return code from mtree to control
the displaying of a error message.
The mtree at the end of the script does function correctly
because I can tell from the printed output.
When mtree prints comments saying extra that
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:30:49 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
I can not get the return code from mtree to control
the displaying of a error message.
The mtree at the end of the script does function correctly
because I can tell from the printed output.
When mtree prints comments saying
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com writes:
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:30:49 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
I can not get the return code from mtree to control
the displaying of a error message.
The mtree at the end of the script does function correctly
because I can tell from the printed
17 matches
Mail list logo
