To Matthias Apitz
I read with interest your contribution and those of others in text editor
usage. In this I do not have much to contribute as I am so far perfectly
happy with vi.
BUT I noticed your political comment at the end of your contribution. I find
this out of place as this questions
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:49:04PM +0200, Richard T C Farnes wrote:
To Matthias Apitz
I read with interest your contribution and those of others in text editor
usage. In this I do not have much to contribute as I am so far perfectly
happy with vi.
BUT I noticed your political comment at
On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:49:04PM +0200, Richard T C Farnes wrote:
To Matthias Apitz
[ ...snip ...]
Yours sincerely
Richard Farnes
I don't recall any netiquette rules about making your signature block
on-topic. Aren't you getting a bit uptight?
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged.
Nicely put Chad.
Thanks!
...here's an example...
On 2010.06.03 20:40, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems.
I'm beginning to think nvi, in particular, might do so. For one thing,
it has a friendlier license (since we're
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:40:14PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
pulling it out of the signature block where it
