Vickly, On 03-09-13 01:12, vickly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do u using outbond n' inbound with difrent isp ?
I could. ISP1 is Vendor X. ISP2 is Vendor Y. I would like all inbound to be on ISP2. But I would like to split outbound between ISP1 and ISP2. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "-kevin-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:10 AM > Subject: triple NIC route challenge > > > > (Please respond directly, as I am not on this list.) > > > > I have 3 NICs in a single machine. Shaped something like > > this: > > > > |-------------------| > > ISP1 -------|DHCP | > > | |------ Internal Network > > ISP2 -------|PPPoE | > > |-------------------| > > > > ISP2 is the new thing. Currently, all my traffic goes out > > to ISP1 thanks to the same old ipnat rule. > > > > If I set up a route for a range of addresses, they will take > > ISP2 out and be very happy. > > > > The problem is inbound. When I ping via ISP1 it works > > beautifully. But when I ping via ISP2, I don't get a > > response. I believe the echorep packet is lost because it > > is being routed according to the existing rules which don't > > give the machine a clue about ISP2. If I add a route to the > > pinging host which uses ISP2, then the pinging starts > > working there, but you guessed it, the ping via ISP1 stops > > working. > > > > - How can I have the outbound route setup based upon the > > inbound request? > > - Furthermore, how can I have that new route only affect > > that connection? > > > > > > > > Bonus Question: > > - How do I configure ipnat such that outbound traffic > > from my Internal Network is split between the two > > external interfaces? > > > > Yes, I know I can route it based on the origin machine on > > the Internal Network, and I know that I can set up the rules > > such that all traffic goes to a single external interface > > and when that interface is down, it will fail over to the > > secondary. What I want is outbound load balancing with > > failover capability. > > > > > > My "ifconfig -a": > > rl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet 12.235.49.181 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast > 255.255.255.255 > > ether 00:01:0a:10:8c:74 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active > > dc0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet 192.168.177.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > 192.168.177.255 > > ether 00:80:c6:f9:2a:d0 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active > > rl1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > ether 00:40:05:83:11:75 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1492 > > inet 68.122.3.211 --> 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 > > Opened by PID 1213 > > > > My "ipnat.rules": > > map rl0 192.168.177.0/24 -> 0/32 > > > > > > > > -- > > -* -kevin- *- > > -* sick with the good infection *- > > -* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *- > > -* http://www.pobox.com/~kathey *- > > _______________________________________________ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > -- -* -kevin- *- -* sick with the good infection *- -* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *- -* http://www.pobox.com/~kathey *- _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
