Le 22/12/2011 19:21, Brad Mettee a écrit :
On 12/22/2011 12:58 PM, Bastien Semene wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to apply a umask of "002" to user "user" (username changed
for this example) while logged-in through ftpd.
I used login class "class" (class name changed for this example)
I edited
On 12/22/2011 12:58 PM, Bastien Semene wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to apply a umask of "002" to user "user" (username changed
for this example) while logged-in through ftpd.
I used login class "class" (class name changed for this example)
I edited /etc/login.conf and set at the bottom (there's
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 03:16:56PM +0800, xinyou yan wrote:
> 1.
> In my system
> umask enter
> 022
>
> I want to know why i do the commander
>
> umask -S
> it show Improper mask
> not u=rwx,g=.
>
> 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac
>
>
> thank you
> _
> On 12/11/10 17:16, xinyou yan wrote:
> 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac
Any player which use libavcodec.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
On 12/11/10 17:16, xinyou yan wrote:
1.
In my system
umask enter
022
I want to know why i do the commander
umask -S
it show Improper mask
not u=rwx,g=.
2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac
flac will play with mplayer.
___
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:31:03 + (GMT),
>> Andy Hiscock said:
A> Ideally I would like to "create mask" to be set to generate -rw-rw.
A> Is there a way of working what the value should be?
I use this in smb.conf, which allows user/group write and world read:
force create mode =
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:50:56 +0100
koen de wijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question aboout the umask under FreeBSD. I couldn't find what
> it exactly is.
> It is something for setting files how you set the 'xrwxrwxrw'
> I found a file where you could chance it but don't knwo anymore wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 14 August 2003 22:46, Jez Hancock wrote:
> > Well, I don't know what to do anymore :)
> > Maybe setting an umask of 077 only for /usr/home (using fstab) would be a
> > good start ?
>
> The only gotcha there is with httpd access - if you dec
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:25:15PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 14 August 2003 20:19, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> > 066 will be *more* secure than 022.
>
> I know that :)
>
> > This is because a umask is deducted from the default per
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:37:46PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 14 August 2003 21:12, Jez Hancock wrote:
> > Some applications require a less strict umask to install files correctly
> > with the right permissions - quite often you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 14 August 2003 21:12, Jez Hancock wrote:
> Some applications require a less strict umask to install files correctly
> with the right permissions - quite often you aren't warned about this
> either and it can be a headache finding out which
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:25:15PM +0200 or thereabouts, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 14 August 2003 20:19, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> > 066 will be *more* secure than 022.
>
> I know that :)
>
> > This is because a umask is deducted from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 14 August 2003 20:19, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> 066 will be *more* secure than 022.
I know that :)
> This is because a umask is deducted from the default permission bits of 666
> (or 777 for executables) on new files. So a umask of 022 will
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:42:37PM +0200 or thereabouts, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi !
>
> In my way to learn security under FreeBSD, I was wondering if a umask of "066"
> in login.conf was a good or bad idea ?
> Any thoughs ?
> I mean at firs
14 matches
Mail list logo
