Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-21 Thread Frank Shute
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:54:47PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:02:12AM -0600, Randy Belk wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-18 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even though I have rebooted the xxx box many times since. Does this mean the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-18 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:08:41PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:43:30 + Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even though I have rebooted the xxx box many times since. Does this mean

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-17 Thread Randy Belk
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even though I have rebooted the xxx box many times since. Does this mean the corresponding entry in /var/run/utmp is wrong and shouldn't be

Re: w(5) shows non-existent or lost process?

2009-02-17 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:02:12AM -0600, Randy Belk wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: The who (or w, or finger) command shows that I'm still logged into ttyp5, even though I have rebooted the xxx box many times since. Does this mean the