Re: Weird NFS Performance Problem
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com wrote: I have a FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE exhibiting weird NFS performance issues and I'd appreciate any suggestions. I have several different directories exported from the same filesystem. The machine that mounts them (a Linux Mint 12 desktop) writes nice and fast to one of them, but writes to the other one are dreadfully slow. Both are mounted on the LM machine using 'rw,soft,intr' in that machine's fstab file. Any ideas on what might be the culprit here? -- --**--** Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ Is the slow directory a LINK ? If it is a LINK , then , try with the real directory name . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird problem with 9.0 Release and ed0
Am 11.08.2012 09:58, schrieb Ian Smith: In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 427, Issue 6, Message: 16 On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:39:36 +0200 Christoph P.U. Kukulies k...@kukulies.org wrote: Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop under 5.1 already. read: started to develop... I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange behaviour such that the outside interface (ed0, BNC connector) that was connected via a small media converter switch to the providers sync line had dropouts. The machine couldn't ping into the Internet and also couldn't be pinged. I first thought it was the switch/media converter, but another (Windows XP) machine that was on the same BNC cable worked flawlessly. That XP box was directly on the outside, not inside nat'd via this one? Yes, on the same BNC cable/interface. --++--80.72.44.x+---[SWITCH/BNCtoTP]-INTERNET-- || | 80.72.44.228 80.72.44.226 | ed0 | ed0 FreeBSD 5.1 XP Box FreeBSD 9.0 xl0 em0 | | --+-172.27.x.x+Intranet So I decided to migrate that 5.1 machine to a 9.0 machine. The situation now is that I have the9.0 machine at the BNC cable and simultanously the old FreeBSD 5.1 gateway on the same BNC cable but through a TP adapter. This was the old machine works fine and I can care about the new machine. Not quite clear .. can you sketch your network configuration? Hope the ascii art doesn't get garbled. Is there a known problem with ed0 cards that have the Realtek 8029 chipset. Do they need some special flags like memory mapping or irq? Long time since I've run anything with 10base2/BNC, but it used to work ok, on an ed0. When I for example boot the 9.0 machine the comping up of the em0 (on mainboard interface results in a highlighted kernel message on the console. The coming up of the ed0 is not flagged this way. And as a result the ed0 interface seems to be dead. Does the outside interface have a static address, or do you use DHCP via the provider's switch/hub/whatever? Show /etc/rc.conf setup. It smells a bit like the interface may not be up soon enough at that time; the ntpd message below could also indicate something like that re ipv6. No DHCP in the game. Everything static. Here some excerpts of dmesg: em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 port 0x4400-0x441f mem 0x9310-0x9311,0x93124000-0x93124fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Using an MSI interrupt em0: Ethernet address: 00:1c:c0:37:b2:9f ed0: RealTek 8029 port 0x1000-0x101f irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci7 ed0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a I also see this: Jul 30 23:03:54 forum ntpd[1711]: unable to create socket on ed0 (20) for fe80:: 2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a#123 You should get more / better clues if you boot with verbose messages. Forgot to add this info: ed0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a inet 80.72.44.230 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast 80.72.44.239 inet6 fe80::2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a%ed0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (10base2/BNC) Must add some more info: My kernel config: cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident DIVERT makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 options IPDIVERT options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT (the rest like in GENERIC). Just to mention: you don't actually need to include FIREWALL* or DIVERT in kernels these days; a GENERIC kernel will work fine, loading modules as needed. Only exception is if you needed FIREWALL_FORWARD, which it appears you don't. Ah, that's good to know. Strange thing: I cannot ping neither the outside interface address nor the inside (172.27.2.115) forum2# egrep 'ifconfig|firewall|natd|gateway|ntpd' /etc/rc.conf ### Basic network and firewall/security options: ### ifconfig_em0= inet 172.27.2.115 netmask 255.255.0.0 ifconfig_lo0=inet 127.0.0.1 # default loopback device configuration. ifconfig_ed0=inet 87.79.34.230 netmask 0xfff0 ntpd_enable=NO natd_enable=YES # Enable natd (if firewall_enable == YES). natd_program=/sbin/natd # path to natd, if you want a different one. natd_interface=ed0# Public interface or IPaddress to use. natd_flags= # Additional
Re: weird problem with 9.0 Release and ed0
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 427, Issue 6, Message: 16 On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:39:36 +0200 Christoph P.U. Kukulies k...@kukulies.org wrote: Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop under 5.1 already. read: started to develop... I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange behaviour such that the outside interface (ed0, BNC connector) that was connected via a small media converter switch to the providers sync line had dropouts. The machine couldn't ping into the Internet and also couldn't be pinged. I first thought it was the switch/media converter, but another (Windows XP) machine that was on the same BNC cable worked flawlessly. That XP box was directly on the outside, not inside nat'd via this one? So I decided to migrate that 5.1 machine to a 9.0 machine. The situation now is that I have the9.0 machine at the BNC cable and simultanously the old FreeBSD 5.1 gateway on the same BNC cable but through a TP adapter. This was the old machine works fine and I can care about the new machine. Not quite clear .. can you sketch your network configuration? Is there a known problem with ed0 cards that have the Realtek 8029 chipset. Do they need some special flags like memory mapping or irq? Long time since I've run anything with 10base2/BNC, but it used to work ok, on an ed0. When I for example boot the 9.0 machine the comping up of the em0 (on mainboard interface results in a highlighted kernel message on the console. The coming up of the ed0 is not flagged this way. And as a result the ed0 interface seems to be dead. Does the outside interface have a static address, or do you use DHCP via the provider's switch/hub/whatever? Show /etc/rc.conf setup. It smells a bit like the interface may not be up soon enough at that time; the ntpd message below could also indicate something like that re ipv6. Here some excerpts of dmesg: em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 port 0x4400-0x441f mem 0x9310-0x9311,0x93124000-0x93124fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Using an MSI interrupt em0: Ethernet address: 00:1c:c0:37:b2:9f ed0: RealTek 8029 port 0x1000-0x101f irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci7 ed0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a I also see this: Jul 30 23:03:54 forum ntpd[1711]: unable to create socket on ed0 (20) for fe80:: 2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a#123 You should get more / better clues if you boot with verbose messages. Forgot to add this info: ed0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a inet 80.72.44.230 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast 80.72.44.239 inet6 fe80::2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a%ed0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (10base2/BNC) Must add some more info: My kernel config: cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident DIVERT makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 options IPDIVERT options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT (the rest like in GENERIC). Just to mention: you don't actually need to include FIREWALL* or DIVERT in kernels these days; a GENERIC kernel will work fine, loading modules as needed. Only exception is if you needed FIREWALL_FORWARD, which it appears you don't. Strange thing: I cannot ping neither the outside interface address nor the inside (172.27.2.115) -- Christoph Kukulies Please show output from: # egrep 'ifconfig|firewall|natd|gateway|ntpd' /etc/rc.conf # cat /etc/natd.conf # ipfw show # netstat -finet -rn cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird problem with 9.0 Release and ed0
Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop under 5.1 already. read: started to develop... I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange behaviour such that the outside interface (ed0, BNC connector) that was connected via a small media converter switch to the providers sync line had dropouts. The machine couldn't ping into the Internet and also couldn't be pinged. I first thought it was the switch/media converter, but another (Windows XP) machine that was on the same BNC cable worked flawlessly. So I decided to migrate that 5.1 machine to a 9.0 machine. The situation now is that I have the9.0 machine at the BNC cable and simultanously the old FreeBSD 5.1 gateway on the same BNC cable but through a TP adapter. This was the old machine works fine and I can care about the new machine. Is there a known problem with ed0 cards that have the Realtek 8029 chipset. Do they need some special flags like memory mapping or irq? When I for example boot the 9.0 machine the comping up of the em0 (on mainboard interface results in a highlighted kernel message on the console. The coming up of the ed0 is not flagged this way. And as a result the ed0 interface seems to be dead. Here some excerpts of dmesg: em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 port 0x4400-0x441f mem 0x9310-0x9311,0x93124000-0x93124fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Using an MSI interrupt em0: Ethernet address: 00:1c:c0:37:b2:9f ed0: RealTek 8029 port 0x1000-0x101f irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci7 ed0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a I also see this: Jul 30 23:03:54 forum ntpd[1711]: unable to create socket on ed0 (20) for fe80:: 2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a#123 Forgot to add this info: ed0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a inet 80.72.44.230 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast 80.72.44.239 inet6 fe80::2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a%ed0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (10base2/BNC) -- Christoph Kukulies ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird problem with 9.0 Release and ed0
Am 10.08.2012 11:40, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: Am 10.08.2012 11:28, schrieb Christoph P.U. Kukulies: The problem need not to be confined to 9.0. It stated to develop under 5.1 already. read: started to develop... I'm running a natd gateway machine that was developing strange behaviour such that the outside interface (ed0, BNC connector) that was connected via a small media converter switch to the providers sync line had dropouts. The machine couldn't ping into the Internet and also couldn't be pinged. I first thought it was the switch/media converter, but another (Windows XP) machine that was on the same BNC cable worked flawlessly. So I decided to migrate that 5.1 machine to a 9.0 machine. The situation now is that I have the9.0 machine at the BNC cable and simultanously the old FreeBSD 5.1 gateway on the same BNC cable but through a TP adapter. This was the old machine works fine and I can care about the new machine. Is there a known problem with ed0 cards that have the Realtek 8029 chipset. Do they need some special flags like memory mapping or irq? When I for example boot the 9.0 machine the comping up of the em0 (on mainboard interface results in a highlighted kernel message on the console. The coming up of the ed0 is not flagged this way. And as a result the ed0 interface seems to be dead. Here some excerpts of dmesg: em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 port 0x4400-0x441f mem 0x9310-0x9311,0x93124000-0x93124fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Using an MSI interrupt em0: Ethernet address: 00:1c:c0:37:b2:9f ed0: RealTek 8029 port 0x1000-0x101f irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci7 ed0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a I also see this: Jul 30 23:03:54 forum ntpd[1711]: unable to create socket on ed0 (20) for fe80:: 2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a#123 Forgot to add this info: ed0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:e0:7d:7c:2b:4a inet 80.72.44.230 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast 80.72.44.239 inet6 fe80::2e0:7dff:fe7c:2b4a%ed0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: Ethernet autoselect (10base2/BNC) Must add some more info: My kernel config: cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident DIVERT makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 options IPDIVERT options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT (the rest like in GENERIC). Strange thing: I cannot ping neither the outside interface address nor the inside (172.27.2.115) -- Christoph Kukulies ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird configuration with Apache 22 and Freebsd 9.0
On 1/30/12 11:40 AM, Darrell Betts wrote: Installed Freebsd9.0 along with Apache2.2 ,php5, php5-extensions, perl, and phpmyadmin phpmyadmin works fine when i put in the url but if I add a virtual host file then I get the error can't find phpmyadmin on the server. What am I missing here? You're missing, most likely, an alias to /phpmyadmin/ or similar. You may want to copy/paste your vhost configuration. Also, no offense meant, but I think you're being lazy. From your question, I can only guess that you haven't looked at your apache error log files. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff SOLVED
Hi Bernt, Glad to hear you figured it out! Cheers, Greg On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote: 2011-12-02 01:53, Bernt Hansson skrev: At some points one is an idiot! /var/db/ports was pointing at the wrong directory and not the ports directory. Well, well you live to learn. 2011-12-01 17:13, Chris Brennan skrev: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se wrote: 2011-12-01 15:11, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? --- Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) --- Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' === Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-**48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE %su - Password: testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper testbox# make -V SU_CMD /usr/bin/su root -c testbox# make -V UID 0 testbox# make -V OPTIONSFILE /var/db/ports/jasper/options Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. I did this also, as root cd /usr/ports (it's a link) mkdir 1 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper mkdir 1 mkdir: 1: File exists Creating files/dirs don't seem to be a problem. /dev/ad0s2g 8.7G 8.3G -322M 104% /usr /dev/ad14.eli 902G 126G 775G 14% /usr/home/bernt/disk8 I'm gonna take a stab in the dark here, paste the result of the following cmd: mount | grep ad14 Just to make sure. testbox# fsck -y -t ufs /dev/ad14.eli ** /dev/ad14.eli ** Last Mounted on /usr/home/bernt/disk8 ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 440342 files, 66312180 used, 406697750 free (144630 frags, 50819140 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) * FILE SYSTEM IS CLEAN * testbox# mount /dev/ad14.eli /usr/home/bernt/disk8 testbox# mount | grep ad14 /dev/ad14.eli on /usr/home/bernt/disk8 (ufs, local, soft-updates) testbox Possibly, you have a weird mount option being passed to the mountpoint, that is preventing you from building ports at this location. On a side note, why exactly do you need ports on an encrypted gli conainer? It's not a need per se only so I could rule out any space issue. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? --- Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) --- Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' === Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Xiv4ACgkQ0sRouByUApAoAQCgzkRr80OZkz4cIBAJmEGK4tzR rm4An2+qDSo8SiBY7tDDkDJa6Jg+3Lf/ =8t74 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 10:54 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: 2011-12-01 15:11, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? --- Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) --- Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' === Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE %su - Password: testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper testbox# make -V SU_CMD /usr/bin/su root -c testbox# make -V UID 0 testbox# make -V OPTIONSFILE /var/db/ports/jasper/options Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. I did this also, as root cd /usr/ports (it's a link) mkdir 1 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper mkdir 1 mkdir: 1: File exists Creating files/dirs don't seem to be a problem. /dev/ad0s2g 8.7G8.3G -322M 104%/usr /dev/ad14.eli902G126G775G14%/usr/home/bernt/disk8 Does /usr/ports link directly to /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper? I wouldn't expect that's the case, but that's what the transcript above implies. Does this problem happen with other ports as well or just graphics/jasper? Do you have an /etc/make.conf file, and if so, what are the contents? What is the output of the following commands? ls -l /var/db/ports/jasper cat /var/db/ports/jasper/options Regards, Greg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Xp9IACgkQ0sRouByUApAwPgCfd00wf5oxpdSWQQoGw9H3DZb1 gosAn27BTLABAckWgIrJwmqhlOkFzAlP =Ymv+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote: 2011-12-01 15:11, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? --- Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) --- Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' === Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-**48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE %su - Password: testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper testbox# make -V SU_CMD /usr/bin/su root -c testbox# make -V UID 0 testbox# make -V OPTIONSFILE /var/db/ports/jasper/options Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. I did this also, as root cd /usr/ports (it's a link) mkdir 1 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper mkdir 1 mkdir: 1: File exists Creating files/dirs don't seem to be a problem. /dev/ad0s2g 8.7G8.3G -322M 104%/usr /dev/ad14.eli902G126G775G14%/usr/home/bernt/disk8 I'm gonna take a stab in the dark here, paste the result of the following cmd: mount | grep ad14 Possibly, you have a weird mount option being passed to the mountpoint, that is preventing you from building ports at this location. On a side note, why exactly do you need ports on an encrypted gli conainer? -- Chris Brennan A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/ GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8 9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:11:10 -0500 Greg Larkin wrote: Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. The actual error is: === Cannot create , check permissions Note the space before the comma. I suspect it's trying to create a directory using an undefined name variable. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 12:21 PM, RW wrote: On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:11:10 -0500 Greg Larkin wrote: Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. The actual error is: === Cannot create , check permissions Note the space before the comma. I suspect it's trying to create a directory using an undefined name variable. Yes, I noticed that and have been trying to figure out why the shell variable optionsdir seems to be empty. I can't see how that's possible yet, but I can't wait to find out! - -g - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Xw+gACgkQ0sRouByUApDo6QCfaV9YM94ryI3GcAqzhqp3e4+j zoMAoLlXwq3TlB6UUBN3C2VD9iwQtUqv =6eEc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff
2011-12-01 17:14, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 10:54 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: 2011-12-01 15:11, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? ---Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) ---Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' ===Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE %su - Password: testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper testbox# make -V SU_CMD /usr/bin/su root -c testbox# make -V UID 0 testbox# make -V OPTIONSFILE /var/db/ports/jasper/options Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper. I did this also, as root cd /usr/ports (it's a link) mkdir 1 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper mkdir 1 mkdir: 1: File exists Creating files/dirs don't seem to be a problem. /dev/ad0s2g 8.7G8.3G -322M 104%/usr /dev/ad14.eli902G126G775G14%/usr/home/bernt/disk8 Does /usr/ports link directly to /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper? No, it's a link from /usr/ports to /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports I wouldn't expect that's the case, but that's what the transcript above implies. Does this problem happen with other ports as well or just graphics/jasper? --- ** Upgrade tasks 10: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 9 failed --- Upgrade of multimedia/vlc started at: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:20:54 +0100 --- Upgrading 'vlc-1.1.11_3,3' to 'vlc-1.1.12,3' (multimedia/vlc) OK? [yes] --- Build of multimedia/vlc started at: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:20:55 +0100 --- Building '/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc' === Cleaning for vlc-1.1.12,3 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/multimedia/vlc make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/multimedia/vlc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/multimedia/vlc. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20111202-3139-oh1rz5-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=vlc-1.1.11_3,3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.1.11_3,3 make ** Fix the problem and try again. --- Build of multimedia/vlc ended at: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:20:57 +0100 (consumed 00:00:02) --- Upgrade of multimedia/vlc ended at: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:20:57 +0100 (consumed 00:00:03) --- ** Upgrade tasks 10: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 10 failed --- Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! x11/pixman (pixman-0.22.2)(unknown build error) ! x11/babl (babl-0.1.4) (unknown build error) ! x11/xterm (xterm-276) (unknown build error) ! graphics/jasper (jasper-1.900.1_9)(unknown build error) ! news/pan (pan-0.134) (unknown build error) ! graphics/inkscape (inkscape-0.48.1_3) (unknown build error) ! graphics/gegl (gegl-0.1.6_1) (unknown build error) ! graphics/gimp-app (gimp-app-2.6.11_4,1) (unknown build error) ! multimedia/audacious-plugins (audacious-plugins-2.5.4_1) (unknown build error) ! multimedia/vlc (vlc-1.1.11_3,3) (unknown build error) --- Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 10 failed --- Session ended at: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:20:57 +0100 (consumed 00:01:30) Do you have an /etc/make.conf file, and if so, what are the contents? # added by use.perl 2011-11-12 09:33:03 PERL_VERSION=5.12.4 What is the output of the following commands? ls -l /var/db/ports/jasper testbox# ls -l /var/db/ports/jasper ls: /var/db/ports/jasper: No such file or directory testbox# cat /var/db/ports/jasper/options testbox# cat /var/db/ports/jasper/options cat: /var/db/ports/jasper/options: No such file or directory testbox# /Bernt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe,
Re: Weird stuff
2011-12-01 17:13, Chris Brennan skrev: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se wrote: 2011-12-01 15:11, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? ---Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) ---Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' ===Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-**48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE %su - Password: testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper testbox# make -V SU_CMD /usr/bin/su root -c testbox# make -V UID 0 testbox# make -V OPTIONSFILE /var/db/ports/jasper/options Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. I did this also, as root cd /usr/ports (it's a link) mkdir 1 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper mkdir 1 mkdir: 1: File exists Creating files/dirs don't seem to be a problem. /dev/ad0s2g 8.7G8.3G -322M 104%/usr /dev/ad14.eli902G126G775G14%/usr/home/bernt/disk8 I'm gonna take a stab in the dark here, paste the result of the following cmd: mount | grep ad14 Just to make sure. testbox# fsck -y -t ufs /dev/ad14.eli ** /dev/ad14.eli ** Last Mounted on /usr/home/bernt/disk8 ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 440342 files, 66312180 used, 406697750 free (144630 frags, 50819140 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) * FILE SYSTEM IS CLEAN * testbox# mount /dev/ad14.eli /usr/home/bernt/disk8 testbox# mount | grep ad14 /dev/ad14.eli on /usr/home/bernt/disk8 (ufs, local, soft-updates) testbox Possibly, you have a weird mount option being passed to the mountpoint, that is preventing you from building ports at this location. On a side note, why exactly do you need ports on an encrypted gli conainer? It's not a need per se only so I could rule out any space issue. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird stuff SOLVED
2011-12-02 01:53, Bernt Hansson skrev: At some points one is an idiot! /var/db/ports was pointing at the wrong directory and not the ports directory. Well, well you live to learn. 2011-12-01 17:13, Chris Brennan skrev: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bernt Hanssonb...@bananmonarki.se wrote: 2011-12-01 15:11, Greg Larkin skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/11 8:37 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello list! Trying to upgrade 3:d party stuff. Only get errors. What gives? --- Upgrading 'jasper-1.900.1_9' to 'jasper-1.900.1_10' (graphics/jasper) --- Building '/usr/ports/graphics/jasper' === Cleaning for jasper-1.900.1_10 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper make config; === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade2030-**48187-8vcb9-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=jasper-1.900.1_9 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.900.1_9 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. Permission is 777 Hi Bernt, Reading through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, the check permissions message is emitted when certain directories cannot be created. Are you running the upgrade as the root user? I would be interested in seeing the output of the following command sequence: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make -V SU_CMD make -V UID make -V OPTIONSFILE %su - Password: testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper testbox# make -V SU_CMD /usr/bin/su root -c testbox# make -V UID 0 testbox# make -V OPTIONSFILE /var/db/ports/jasper/options Also, what happens if you simply do this: cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config testbox# cd /usr/ports/graphics/jasper make config === Cannot create , check permissions *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/**graphics/jasper. I did this also, as root cd /usr/ports (it's a link) mkdir 1 cd /usr/home/bernt/disk8/ports/graphics/jasper mkdir 1 mkdir: 1: File exists Creating files/dirs don't seem to be a problem. /dev/ad0s2g 8.7G 8.3G -322M 104% /usr /dev/ad14.eli 902G 126G 775G 14% /usr/home/bernt/disk8 I'm gonna take a stab in the dark here, paste the result of the following cmd: mount | grep ad14 Just to make sure. testbox# fsck -y -t ufs /dev/ad14.eli ** /dev/ad14.eli ** Last Mounted on /usr/home/bernt/disk8 ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 440342 files, 66312180 used, 406697750 free (144630 frags, 50819140 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) * FILE SYSTEM IS CLEAN * testbox# mount /dev/ad14.eli /usr/home/bernt/disk8 testbox# mount | grep ad14 /dev/ad14.eli on /usr/home/bernt/disk8 (ufs, local, soft-updates) testbox Possibly, you have a weird mount option being passed to the mountpoint, that is preventing you from building ports at this location. On a side note, why exactly do you need ports on an encrypted gli conainer? It's not a need per se only so I could rule out any space issue. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Linux - FreeBSD/ZFS NFSv4 interoperability problem
On 09/02/10 21:25, David Brodbeck wrote: While doing some interoperability testing between Linux and FreeBSD, I came up with this unusual issue. I could use some help figuring out if this is a bug, and if so, where to file it. Here's the scenario: - FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE server, sharing a ZFS filesystem via NFSv4. I think that this is the beginning of your problems - even the developer who is working on NFSv4 says it's too experimental to be used in real world. - Linux client (I've tested with RHEL 5.4 and Debian Lenny) mounting said filesystem with NFSv4. - A user on the Linux client does a Subversion checkout onto the mounted filesystem. At the end of the checkout, access to the filesystem hangs. nfsd on the FreeBSD server and rpciod on the Linux client seem to be in a tight loop, and there's lots of network traffic between them. I can reproduce this every time. The problem does not occur if the backing filesystem is UFS instead of ZFS, if NFSv3 is used instead of NFSv4, or if the client is FreeBSD instead of Linux. ... but you may have stumbled on something specific. I recommend you repeat this same post (and others you have on the similar topic) on the freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list, the developer (Rick Macklem) reads it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Linux - FreeBSD/ZFS NFSv4 interoperability problem
Thanks, Ivan. I'll pursue it there. If it's not ready for prime time yet, I understand, but I'd also like to help nudge it in that direction. :) On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 09/02/10 21:25, David Brodbeck wrote: While doing some interoperability testing between Linux and FreeBSD, I came up with this unusual issue. I could use some help figuring out if this is a bug, and if so, where to file it. Here's the scenario: - FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE server, sharing a ZFS filesystem via NFSv4. I think that this is the beginning of your problems - even the developer who is working on NFSv4 says it's too experimental to be used in real world. - Linux client (I've tested with RHEL 5.4 and Debian Lenny) mounting said filesystem with NFSv4. - A user on the Linux client does a Subversion checkout onto the mounted filesystem. At the end of the checkout, access to the filesystem hangs. nfsd on the FreeBSD server and rpciod on the Linux client seem to be in a tight loop, and there's lots of network traffic between them. I can reproduce this every time. The problem does not occur if the backing filesystem is UFS instead of ZFS, if NFSv3 is used instead of NFSv4, or if the client is FreeBSD instead of Linux. ... but you may have stumbled on something specific. I recommend you repeat this same post (and others you have on the similar topic) on the freebsd-fs at freebsd.org mailing list, the developer (Rick Macklem) reads it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/2010 23:47:44, Aaron Lewis wrote: Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home directory. So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. pw user add is fine for creating accounts. It should create the home directory for you if given the right arguments. Even so, just creating the home directory by hand after creating the account should not be a problem. $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below This means that the ownership/permissions of one of the directories in the path up to /home/frozen is wrong. Implied is that it is possible for non-root to substitute their own copy of /home/frozen/.login_conf somehow. What's the output from: ls -ld / /home (Add /usr/home to that list if /home is a sym-link) Is there anything unusual about how the filesystem is mounted? // I don't know why `stat' function fails .. $ ls -ld /home/frozen drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Which is a little disconcerting, because ssh is pretty anal about file permissions itself, but it isn't triggering the problem here. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuosQkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyL+QCgib3JZkMQDsa1JmKg8rqFiIIp EIYAniLNsh/lMANiJsFSbdx8oekEpMNR =NlkH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
$ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below This means that the ownership/permissions of one of the directories in the path up to /home/frozen is wrong. Implied is that it is possible for non-root to substitute their own copy of /home/frozen/.login_conf somehow. What's the output from: ls -ld / /home (Add /usr/home to that list if /home is a sym-link) Is there anything unusual about how the filesystem is mounted? Oops , it's a symbol link. [fro...@*** ~]$ ls -ld / /home /usr/home drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel 512 Mar 23 07:48 / lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel8 Dec 3 14:34 /home - usr/home drwxr-x--- 4 root wheel 512 Mar 23 07:39 /usr/home I've just read sth. about Biba Model , `no read down, no write up' , It's default installation with a Custom Kernel , MAC enabled. Attached Kernel Config File. // I don't know why `stat' function fails .. $ ls -ld /home/frozen drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Which is a little disconcerting, because ssh is pretty anal about file permissions itself, but it isn't triggering the problem here. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuosQkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyL+QCgib3JZkMQDsa1JmKg8rqFiIIp EIYAniLNsh/lMANiJsFSbdx8oekEpMNR =NlkH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode cpu I686_CPU ident AARON # To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints #hints GENERIC.hints # Default places to look for devices. # Use the following to compile in values accessible to the kernel # through getenv() (or kenv(1) in userland). The format of the file # is 'variable=value', see kenv(1) # # env GENERIC.env makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET# InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options SCTP# Stream Control Transmission Protocol options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options UFS_GJOURNAL# Enable gjournal-based UFS journaling options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server options NFSLOCKD# Network Lock Manager options NFS_ROOT# NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS# Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization options COMPAT_43TTY# BSD 4.3 TTY compat (sgtty) options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options STACK # stack(9) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES # POSIX-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hello BSD hackers, I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through ssh , everything's fine. But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: no home directory Logging in with home dir / Does anyone has any ideas ? Here's some debug information = % grep aaron /etc/passwd aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash % ls -ladh /home/aaron/ drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron What are the settings for ChallengeResponseAuthentication UsePam in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
Matthew Seaman wrote: On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hello BSD hackers, I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through ssh , everything's fine. But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: no home directory Logging in with home dir / Does anyone has any ideas ? Here's some debug information = % grep aaron /etc/passwd aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash % ls -ladh /home/aaron/ drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron What are the settings for ChallengeResponseAuthentication UsePam in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? Nothing found , or commented out. What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? # grep -v -e ^# /etc/pam.d/sshd | sed '/^$/d' authsufficientpam_opie.sono_warn no_fake_prompts authrequisitepam_opieaccess.sono_warn allow_local authrequiredpam_unix.sono_warn try_first_pass accountrequiredpam_nologin.so accountrequiredpam_login_access.so accountrequiredpam_unix.so sessionrequiredpam_permit.so passwordrequiredpam_unix.sono_warn try_first_pass # grep -v -e ^# /etc/pam.d/login | sed '/^$/d' authsufficientpam_self.sono_warn authincludesystem accountrequisitepam_securetty.so accountrequiredpam_nologin.so accountincludesystem sessionincludesystem passwordincludesystem It's all fresh install , did i do something wrong ? It's really strange .. never met before. Cheers, Matthew -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hello BSD hackers, I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through ssh , everything's fine. But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: no home directory Logging in with home dir / Does anyone has any ideas ? Here's some debug information = % grep aaron /etc/passwd aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash % ls -ladh /home/aaron/ drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron Have you set up a jail? The no home directory message appears in usr.sbin/jail/jail.c in 8-stable. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/2010 12:46:06, Aaron Lewis wrote: Matthew Seaman wrote: On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hello BSD hackers, I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through ssh , everything's fine. But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: no home directory Logging in with home dir / Does anyone has any ideas ? Here's some debug information = % grep aaron /etc/passwd aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash % ls -ladh /home/aaron/ drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron What are the settings for ChallengeResponseAuthentication UsePam in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? Nothing found , or commented out. Commented out means using the default setting -- which is 'yes' for both of those. ie. sshd is using the PAM system. Which means that PAM is probably working just fine. What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? # grep -v -e ^# /etc/pam.d/sshd | sed '/^$/d' authsufficientpam_opie.sono_warn no_fake_prompts authrequisitepam_opieaccess.sono_warn allow_local authrequiredpam_unix.sono_warn try_first_pass accountrequiredpam_nologin.so accountrequiredpam_login_access.so accountrequiredpam_unix.so sessionrequiredpam_permit.so passwordrequiredpam_unix.sono_warn try_first_pass These are also the default settings for sshd -- which as you say is working. # grep -v -e ^# /etc/pam.d/login | sed '/^$/d' authsufficientpam_self.sono_warn authincludesystem accountrequisitepam_securetty.so accountrequiredpam_nologin.so accountincludesystem sessionincludesystem passwordincludesystem Again, this is the default for login. I should have asked you for the contents of /etc/pam.d/system as well, but if you say it's not been modified I'll believe you. H... It's all fresh install , did i do something wrong ? It's really strange .. never met before. Something is a bit fubar somewhere, yes. From the symptoms you described, the immediate suspect would be the PAM system, but there are no obvious configuration problems with what you've shown me. Is there anything notable in /var/log/auth.log from the failed console logins? Can you try gratuitously creating another user account and seeing if that is affected in the same way, or indeed if it makes any difference to the original user account? Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkunhDoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwzBQCfccc1KXwscGDrHV2wn5Zr8xnO pMAAnjJVpjZc39wczR4u8nYo/Kxpvivl =3oJZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home directory. So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below // I don't know why `stat' function fails .. $ ls -ld /home/frozen drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Matthew Seaman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/2010 12:46:06, Aaron Lewis wrote: Matthew Seaman wrote: On 22/03/2010 07:11:23, Aaron Lewis wrote: Hello BSD hackers, I have a strange problems with user's home directory , if i log in through ssh , everything's fine. But on virtual terminals , it tolds me: no home directory Logging in with home dir / Does anyone has any ideas ? Here's some debug information = % grep aaron /etc/passwd aaron:*:1001:1001:frozen:/home/aaron:/usr/local/bin/bash % ls -ladh /home/aaron/ drwxr-xr-x 3 aaron aaron 512B Mar 5 22:36 /home/aaron What are the settings for ChallengeResponseAuthentication UsePam in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config? Nothing found , or commented out. Commented out means using the default setting -- which is 'yes' for both of those. ie. sshd is using the PAM system. Which means that PAM is probably working just fine. What are the contents of /etc/pam.d/login and /etc/pam.d/sshd ? # grep -v -e ^# /etc/pam.d/sshd | sed '/^$/d' authsufficientpam_opie.sono_warn no_fake_prompts authrequisitepam_opieaccess.sono_warn allow_local authrequiredpam_unix.sono_warn try_first_pass accountrequiredpam_nologin.so accountrequiredpam_login_access.so accountrequiredpam_unix.so sessionrequiredpam_permit.so passwordrequiredpam_unix.sono_warn try_first_pass These are also the default settings for sshd -- which as you say is working. # grep -v -e ^# /etc/pam.d/login | sed '/^$/d' authsufficientpam_self.sono_warn authincludesystem accountrequisitepam_securetty.so accountrequiredpam_nologin.so accountincludesystem sessionincludesystem passwordincludesystem Again, this is the default for login. I should have asked you for the contents of /etc/pam.d/system as well, but if you say it's not been modified I'll believe you. H... It's all fresh install , did i do something wrong ? It's really strange .. never met before. Something is a bit fubar somewhere, yes. From the symptoms you described, the immediate suspect would be the PAM system, but there are no obvious configuration problems with what you've shown me. Is there anything notable in /var/log/auth.log from the failed console logins? Can you try gratuitously creating another user account and seeing if that is affected in the same way, or indeed if it makes any difference to the original user account? Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkunhDoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwzBQCfccc1KXwscGDrHV2wn5Zr8xnO pMAAnjJVpjZc39wczR4u8nYo/Kxpvivl =3oJZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Aaron Lewis aaron.lewis1...@gmail.comwrote: Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home directory. So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below // I don't know why `stat' function fails .. $ ls -ld /home/frozen drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Maybe you could bottom post? Thanks, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mac-troubleshoot.html -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird Problems with User Home Directory , Asking for help
Oh , thanks Adam , i shouldn't be so lazy , I'll check that page. Adam Vande More wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Aaron Lewis aaron.lewis1...@gmail.com mailto:aaron.lewis1...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like i found the problem , i thought i've made a mistake. I shouldn't use `pw user add aaron' right ? That won't create user home directory , when i found i've got no home directory. So at that time , i created it and change the owner to my user. $ sudo tail -f /var/log/auth.log login: _secure_path: cannot stat /home/frozen/.login_conf: Permission denied // Strange , pay attention to user permissions below // I don't know why `stat' function fails .. $ ls -ld /home/frozen drwxr-xr-x 3 frozen frozen 512 Mar 5 22:36 /home/frozen/ $ ls -lah /home/frozen/.login_conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frozen frozen 171 Dec 3 14:34 /home/frozen/.login_conf BTW: ssh login with user frozen is fine. Maybe you could bottom post? Thanks, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mac-troubleshoot.html -- Adam Vande More -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0x4A6D32A0 FingerPrint EA63 26B2 6C52 72EA A4A5 EB6B BDFE 35B0 4A6D 32A0 irc: A4r0n on freenode ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU
Pieter de Goeje wrote: I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. These commands: cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal cpuset -c -l 2 make Will always result in errors, for example this one: gmake: *** No rule to make target `...@maintainer_mode_true@', needed by `config.h.in'. Stop. *** Error code 1 Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check the input files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of syntax errors for example. The configure process always completes, but apparently it creates broken files. When I run make on any other core, it always completes successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make I've checked with script that the output of the build process is exactly the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried to run cpuburn on that core, but it didn't find any problem. It's really weird that system is otherwise very stable. What do you guys think the problem is? CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. I've also tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. As a test I just ran these two commands on my Athlon II 630 here, but running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64 build. The make process ran directly to completion with no error. With overclocking too. Tried 4 runs, on each core. I'm not sure I recall all the details correctly without checking, but I thought there were some early samples or generations of these processors that were not the same as the final production releases. Something to do with being Phenom cores that had L3 cache disabled, being released as early engineering samples but the die of the final products is different with no L3 cache present from manufacturing. I'd check into the stepping and if it turns out not to be a final version get whoever you bought it from to replace it. It may not be the core itself, but bad L1/L2 cache. It's either that or the only other difference is you're running stable, and I'm not. But I'd suspect bad cache spots in L1/L2. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU
Hi, On 28 January 2010 am 06:54:13 Pieter de Goeje wrote: I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. it really looks like. Are you sure it is a quad core and not just a triple core? As already mentioned, you should check the stepping the software tells you but also what is actually written onto the CPU itself. Try to get the CPU exchanged and see what happens then. Erich These commands: cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal cpuset -c -l 2 make Will always result in errors, for example this one: gmake: *** No rule to make target `...@maintainer_mode_true@', needed by `config.h.in'. Stop. *** Error code 1 Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check the input files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of syntax errors for example. The configure process always completes, but apparently it creates broken files. When I run make on any other core, it always completes successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make I've checked with script that the output of the build process is exactly the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried to run cpuburn on that core, but it didn't find any problem. It's really weird that system is otherwise very stable. What do you guys think the problem is? CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. I've also tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. Thanks! -- Pieter ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird build errors only on 3rd core of quad core CPU
On Thursday 28 January 2010 01:54:01 Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, On 28 January 2010 am 06:54:13 Pieter de Goeje wrote: I am suspecting a broken CPU, but am not sure. it really looks like. Are you sure it is a quad core and not just a triple core? It definitely identifies itself as a quadcore in dmesg (the text matches what it said on the box): AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 620. I don't think the hacks which activate the 4th core on a triple core can alter that information. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 620 Processor (2600.02-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x100f52 Stepping = 2 Features=0x178bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA, CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT Features2=0x802009SSE3,MON,CX16,POPCNT AMD Features=0xee500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM, 3DNow!+,3DNow! AMD Features2=0x37ffLAHF,CMP,SVM,ExtAPIC,CR8,ABM,SSE4A,MAS,Prefetch, OSVW,IBS,SKINIT,WDT TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 2147483648 (2048 MB) avail memory = 1795858432 (1712 MB) ACPI APIC Table: 120909 APIC1901 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 As already mentioned, you should check the stepping the software tells you but also what is actually written onto the CPU itself. Try to get the CPU exchanged and see what happens then. I suppose that's the only way... hopefully I can convince the shop I bought it from that it is broken. Erich These commands: cd /usr/ports/sysutils/hal cpuset -c -l 2 make Will always result in errors, for example this one: gmake: *** No rule to make target `...@maintainer_mode_true@', needed by `config.h.in'. Stop. *** Error code 1 Sometimes the error occurs in a different place. When I check the input files, they are indeed broken. Gcc stops because of syntax errors for example. The configure process always completes, but apparently it creates broken files. When I run make on any other core, it always completes successfully: cpuset -c -l 0,1,3 make I've checked with script that the output of the build process is exactly the same, up until the error occurs. I've also tried to run cpuburn on that core, but it didn't find any problem. It's really weird that system is otherwise very stable. What do you guys think the problem is? CPU is AMD Athlon II X4 620. Running FreeBSD 8-STABLE/amd64. I've also tried -CURRENT, but it didn't help. Thanks! -- Pieter ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird save-entropy behaviour
On Sunday 15 November 2009 17:30:02 Ed Jobs wrote: Yesterday, i noticed a very weird behaviour on my computer (which is running 8.0-RC3 btw. The shells were not responding and the load was insane, and constantly going up. At the time i managed to lock myself out, the load was 84 and growing (i have a screenshot if anyone is interested). That happened last night. Today, the computer was ok and i managed to ssh into it. The root account was spammed with two types of cron mails. half of them said: mv: /var/db/entropy/saved-entropy.2: No such file or directory and the other half said: override r operator/operator for /var/db/entropy/saved-entropy.2? (y/n [n]) not overwritten So i know that it's the save-entropy cron job, but i doubt that was supposed to happen, and i have never touched that directory. Anyone has an idea? Did the operator uid change or perhaps shared with another uid? Check both `id operator` and `id 2`. Secondly, why did this stop? Seems like a weird question to ask, but since this script is supposed to run every 11 minutes, there should not be a reason for this to stop, if there's a race condition. -- Mel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird save-entropy behaviour
On Monday 16 November 2009 00:12, Mel Flynn wrote:
Did the operator uid change or perhaps shared with another uid?
Check both `id operator` and `id 2`.
Secondly, why did this stop? Seems like a weird question to ask, but since
this script is supposed to run every 11 minutes, there should not be a
reason for this to stop, if there's a race condition.
# id operator
uid=2(operator) gid=5(operator) groups=5(operator)
# id 2
uid=2(operator) gid=5(operator) groups=5(operator)
As for the orer part, why did it stop, i really have no clue. All the messages
arrived at root's mailbox at 5:57, tho the date in them said that they were
sent at 5:50.
It's really strange because I was locked out from the computer at 2:29, so
it's not something I did. and there's nothing that cron runs at that time.
by the way:
the mails that i got were not only about /var/db/entropy/saved-entropy.2, but
/var/db/entropy/saved-entropy.{1,2,3,4,5,6,8} as well
--
Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to
understand.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: weird save-entropy behaviour
On Sunday 15 November 2009 23:38:10 Ed Jobs wrote: On Monday 16 November 2009 00:12, Mel Flynn wrote: Did the operator uid change or perhaps shared with another uid? Check both `id operator` and `id 2`. Secondly, why did this stop? Seems like a weird question to ask, but since this script is supposed to run every 11 minutes, there should not be a reason for this to stop, if there's a race condition. # id operator uid=2(operator) gid=5(operator) groups=5(operator) # id 2 uid=2(operator) gid=5(operator) groups=5(operator) As for the orer part, why did it stop, i really have no clue. All the messages arrived at root's mailbox at 5:57, tho the date in them said that they were sent at 5:50. It's really strange because I was locked out from the computer at 2:29, so it's not something I did. and there's nothing that cron runs at that time. Does the cron log (/var/log/cron) show that it was run as operator around the time it started? /usr/sbin/cron[47350]: (operator) CMD (/usr/libexec/save-entropy) Even if it wasn't, I don't see a reason for such a buildup. Unlesssince stdin isn't sending anything, it could be the scripts wait indefinitely for user confirmation, then finally get killed off by some limit. There should be some hint at that in /var/log/messages around 5:50. The script should probably do mv -f in line 76. -- Mel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird save-entropy behaviour
On Monday 16 November 2009 00:58, Mel Flynn wrote: Does the cron log (/var/log/cron) show that it was run as operator around the time it started? /usr/sbin/cron[47350]: (operator) CMD (/usr/libexec/save-entropy) Even if it wasn't, I don't see a reason for such a buildup. Unlesssince stdin isn't sending anything, it could be the scripts wait indefinitely for user confirmation, then finally get killed off by some limit. There should be some hint at that in /var/log/messages around 5:50. The script should probably do mv -f in line 76. you were right. there was something at the messages. Nov 15 05:50:49 hostname sshd[1126]: error: accept: Software caused connection abort Nov 15 05:50:49 hostname last message repeated 6 times weird. the only thing in auth.log about sshd[1126] is: Nov 13 12:31:51 hostname sshd[1126]: Server listening on :: port 22. Nov 13 12:31:51 hostname sshd[1126]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22. and the message that was in the messages log too. -- Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Weird networking issue
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote: [snip description of network flakiness on one server, out of several on the same switch behind the same gateway] Any ideas? :-) I have 2: 1.) Bad NIC 2.) Bad CPU 3. Bad cable from NIC to switch 4. Bad switch port These may not be all that likely, but they're easy to test if you have even a marginally-competent tech available at the site. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird networking issue
Glen Barber skrev: On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Glen Barberglen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: I have 2: 1.) Bad NIC 2.) Bad CPU A while back, I found out I had a bad CPU after replacing everything else on the machine -- I would still receive CRC mismatch errors with portsnap(8). The NIC is more probable IMHO, but both should be suspect here. Now that I think about it... Do you do regular builds? Can you try to 'buildworld' (assuming you can get csup to pull the source tree? If CPU is the problem, you may experience random SIGSEGV errors when running the buildworld. If it fails in different areas of the build, this is most likely (from my experience) the problem. I've been doing buildworld -j4 for 8 hours without problems now. I'll see if I can get someone onsite to try another cable and switch port. -- Joel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird networking issue
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote: [snip description of network flakiness on one server, out of several on the same switch behind the same gateway] Any ideas? :-) I have 2: 1.) Bad NIC 2.) Bad CPU 3. Bad cable from NIC to switch 4. Bad switch port These may not be all that likely, but they're easy to test if you have even a marginally-competent tech available at the site. I had similar behavior about a years ago. I also had a not very frequent( once a week) sporadic reboot issue during it. I replaced the RAM and it's not had the issue anymore. I may have rebuilt world too... -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Solved] Re: Weird networking issue
Adam Vande More skrev: On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote: [snip description of network flakiness on one server, out of several on the same switch behind the same gateway] Any ideas? :-) I have 2: 1.) Bad NIC 2.) Bad CPU 3. Bad cable from NIC to switch 4. Bad switch port These may not be all that likely, but they're easy to test if you have even a marginally-competent tech available at the site. I had similar behavior about a years ago. I also had a not very frequent( once a week) sporadic reboot issue during it. I replaced the RAM and it's not had the issue anymore. I may have rebuilt world too... The on-site techs ran the Dell diagnostics tests and the Broadcom test (for the NIC) but was unable to find any hw errors. So, they finally replaced the cable and connected it to another switch port. And now everything seems to be working. I've been doing some tests for a few hours, but I can't get the machine to crap out again. Looking good so far... :-) -- Joel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [Solved] Re: Weird networking issue
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote: And now everything seems to be working. I've been doing some tests for a few hours, but I can't get the machine to crap out again. Looking good so far... :-) Good to hear. :-) -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird networking issue
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote: Yesterday I noticed something weird with one of my mail servers (FreeBSD 7.2), which is located far away from me. At first I thought it was my mail client that was misbehaving since a couple of mails that I retrieved from the server looked...odd. Characters were missing, and the mail headers were sometimes (perhaps 1 out of 100 mails) sort of scrambled. This server isn't doing anything really useful, except handling a few mails every day. No load at all and it has been running for a few months without any problems. Anyway, after some time I realized that Thunderbird probably wasn't the problem. I discovered that ssh connections suddenly dropped (seems random) when I was connected to the server. Often with messages like: Received disconnect from x.x.x.x: 2: Bad packet length 3365265859. I tried to ping it and I constantly got 5-15% packet loss. The same symptoms are there if I connect to it from other places, so my home connection isn't the problem. I get 0 packet loss if I ping the gateway which the server is behind from my home connection. Anyway, while I was connected to the machine (and scratching my head) I did a csup from the server to fetch ports and other stuff, but that failed every time, with different messages: 1st try: Edit ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Add delta 1.625 2009.08.03.15.36.58 miwi Edit ports/UPDATING Add delta 1.845 2009.08.03.19.08.48 dougb csup: inflate: invalid stored block lengths 2nd try: Edit ports/devel/libvc/Makefile Add delta 1.11 2009.08.02.19.33.28 mezz Edit ports/devel/libytnef/Makefile Add delta 1.6 2009.08.02.19.33.28 mezz Receiver: Protocol error 3rd try: Edit ports/devel/p5-threads-shared/distinfo Add delta 1.4 2009.07.22.17.25.14 pgollucci Edit ports/devel/p5-usb/pkg-plist Add delta 1.3 2009.07.30.23.04.41 pgollucci csup: inflate: invalid distance too far back Ok. So something is messed up. Checked my other server (located at the same place) to see if there were any problems (it is running VMware ESXI with 4 virtual machines, all running FreeBSD 7.2.), but all of the virtual hosts were fine. No packet loss, no ssh problems, no nothing. This server is connected to the same switch and behind the same gateway. So are also a bunch of Windows servers. None of them have any problems. Checked the logs on my mail server to see if there were anything weird...and the logs were filled with this: arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:c7:24:69:ae to 00:16:cf:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:cf:24:69:ae to 00:16:c7:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:c7:24:69:ae to 00:16:cf:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:cf:24:69:ae to 00:16:c7:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:c7:24:69:ae to 00:16:cf:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:cf:24:69:ae to 00:16:c7:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:c7:24:69:ae to 00:16:cf:24:69:ae on bge0 arp: x.x.x.x moved from 00:16:cf:24:69:ae to 00:16:c7:24:69:ae on bge0 x.x.x.x is my gateway which all my servers are behind. These messages started yesterday, about the same time that the problems appeared. Any ideas? :-) I have 2: 1.) Bad NIC 2.) Bad CPU A while back, I found out I had a bad CPU after replacing everything else on the machine -- I would still receive CRC mismatch errors with portsnap(8). The NIC is more probable IMHO, but both should be suspect here. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird networking issue
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Glen Barberglen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: I have 2: 1.) Bad NIC 2.) Bad CPU A while back, I found out I had a bad CPU after replacing everything else on the machine -- I would still receive CRC mismatch errors with portsnap(8). The NIC is more probable IMHO, but both should be suspect here. Now that I think about it... Do you do regular builds? Can you try to 'buildworld' (assuming you can get csup to pull the source tree? If CPU is the problem, you may experience random SIGSEGV errors when running the buildworld. If it fails in different areas of the build, this is most likely (from my experience) the problem. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird problem with gmirror - cannot add the Good disk when previously failed SATA disk is online
Στις Monday 18 May 2009 22:07:24 ο/η Miroslav Lachman έγραψε: Achilleas Mantzios wrote: Hello, I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server. today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk ad4. The messages were: May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=268091264 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: Intel i865G GMCH on vgapci0 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xf000 128MB May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.5.0 20060119 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: [ITHREAD] May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: subdisk4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 disconnected. May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad4 stopped. I read http://www.eztiger.org/2008/08/removing-and-re-adding-a-disk-in-gmirror/ hoping that the rebuld failure was temprary and so i tried to just run # gmirror forget gm0 # gmirror insert gm0 ad4 The correct order of commands is: atacontrol list gmirror list gmirror forget gm0 gmirror clear -v ad4 gmirror insert -v gm0 ad4 Thanx. Miroslav Lachman -- Achilleas Mantzios ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird problem with gmirror - cannot add the Good disk when previously failed SATA disk is online
Στις Monday 18 May 2009 13:27:58 ο/η Manolis Kiagias έγραψε: It looks to me you got a bad disk now. Manoli, thanx i replaced the bad disk and the system looks ok, rebulding gm0. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Achilleas Mantzios ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird problem with gmirror - cannot add the Good disk when previously failed SATA disk is online
Achilleas Mantzios wrote: Hello, in advance sorry for the cross posting, it is just that freebsd-geom didnt seem that populated. I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server. today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk ad4. The messages were: May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=268091264 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: Intel i865G GMCH on vgapci0 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xf000 128MB May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.5.0 20060119 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: [ITHREAD] May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: subdisk4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 disconnected. May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad4 stopped. It looks to me you got a bad disk now. I read http://www.eztiger.org/2008/08/removing-and-re-adding-a-disk-in-gmirror/ hoping that the rebuld failure was temprary and so i tried to just run # gmirror forget gm0 # gmirror insert gm0 ad4 But the system responded (if i remember correctly) Unknown provider ad4. The system no longer could see ad4 being online. So i rebooted the system many times and had these results: -When having put offline ad4 (disconnected by hardware), the system booted ok. -When having both disks online the system responded consistently with: GEOM_MIRROR: Cannot add disk ad6 to gm0 (error=22). Which IMO is not very ok, since gm0 should add ad6 without problem, no matter if ad4 is online or not. -When having only ad4 online, then it simply cannot find gm0 at all. (kind of reasonable) So my only option is to have only ad6 online, with a current gmirror status: panix# gmirror status NameStatus Components mirror/gm0 COMPLETE ad6 Anyone has an idea of how should i proceed (besides buying a UPS unit!) Is it meaningfull to go for a new Disk to replace current ad4? I'd recommend attaching the bad disk on its own to a system and perform tests on it. Is the BIOS recognizing this properly? I would run hardware tests on it - either manufacturer ones, or stuff like sysutils/smartmontools. You could also try installing FreeBSD on it and see if it works. And probably use dd to clean all the contents, esp. the partition table and the last sector where geom information is stored. Why is the presence of the supposed bad disk ad4, affecting gm0, when having already told gm0 to forget about ad4? The bad disk may be sending confusing signals to the bus / IDE interface. I've had this once (although it was due to a bad cable). The entire mirror would disappear suddenly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird problem with gmirror - cannot add the Good disk when previously failed SATA disk is online
Hey Manoli! glad to see you again, Στις Monday 18 May 2009 13:27:58 ο/η Manolis Kiagias έγραψε: Achilleas Mantzios wrote: Hello, in advance sorry for the cross posting, it is just that freebsd-geom didnt seem that populated. I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server. today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk ad4. The messages were: May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=268091264 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: Intel i865G GMCH on vgapci0 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xf000 128MB May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.5.0 20060119 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: [ITHREAD] May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: subdisk4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 disconnected. May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad4 stopped. It looks to me you got a bad disk now. I certainly hope so, since there is nothing else i can do I read http://www.eztiger.org/2008/08/removing-and-re-adding-a-disk-in-gmirror/ hoping that the rebuld failure was temprary and so i tried to just run # gmirror forget gm0 # gmirror insert gm0 ad4 But the system responded (if i remember correctly) Unknown provider ad4. The system no longer could see ad4 being online. So i rebooted the system many times and had these results: -When having put offline ad4 (disconnected by hardware), the system booted ok. -When having both disks online the system responded consistently with: GEOM_MIRROR: Cannot add disk ad6 to gm0 (error=22). Which IMO is not very ok, since gm0 should add ad6 without problem, no matter if ad4 is online or not. -When having only ad4 online, then it simply cannot find gm0 at all. (kind of reasonable) So my only option is to have only ad6 online, with a current gmirror status: panix# gmirror status NameStatus Components mirror/gm0 COMPLETE ad6 Anyone has an idea of how should i proceed (besides buying a UPS unit!) Is it meaningfull to go for a new Disk to replace current ad4? I'd recommend attaching the bad disk on its own to a system and perform tests on it. Is the BIOS recognizing this properly? I would run hardware Yes, the BIOS recognizes it ok i suppose. tests on it - either manufacturer ones, or stuff like sysutils/smartmontools. You could also try installing FreeBSD on it and see if it works. And probably use dd to clean all the contents, esp. the partition table and the last sector where geom information is stored. Thanx, lacking time i think i will try to use a brand new identical disk. Why is the presence of the supposed bad disk ad4, affecting gm0, when having already told gm0 to forget about ad4? The bad disk may be sending confusing signals to the bus / IDE interface. I've had this once (although it was due to a bad cable). The entire mirror would disappear suddenly. -- Achilleas Mantzios ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird problem with gmirror - cannot add the Good disk when previously failed SATA disk is online
panix panix wrote: Hello, in advance sorry for the cross posting, it is just that freebsd-geom didnt seem that populated. I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server. today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk ad4. The messages were: May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=268091264 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: Intel i865G GMCH on vgapci0 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xf000 128MB May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.5.0 20060119 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: [ITHREAD] May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: subdisk4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 disconnected. May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad4 stopped. I read http://www.eztiger.org/2008/08/removing-and-re-adding-a-disk-in-gmirror/ hoping that the rebuld failure was temprary and so i tried to just run # gmirror forget gm0 # gmirror insert gm0 ad4 But the system responded (if i remember correctly) Unknown provider ad4. The system no longer could see ad4 being online. Yes, as you were informed by the device detached message - after that point the ad4 was removed from /dev. So i rebooted the system many times and had these results: -When having put offline ad4 (disconnected by hardware), the system booted ok. -When having both disks online the system responded consistently with: GEOM_MIRROR: Cannot add disk ad6 to gm0 (error=22). Which means that gm0 was somehow created before - maybe from the stale ad4 copy? If so, you are attempting to add a newer generation of data (from ad6) to a gm0 instantiated from an older generation (from ad4). This could explain the error code (22=invalid argument). OTOH if you only have ad6 in the system this means you are trying to insert ad6 into a mirror which is already instantiated by ad6 - which is trivially wrong. Which IMO is not very ok, since gm0 should add ad6 without problem, no matter if ad4 is online or not. You cannot really expect the system to behave correctly with broken hardware. -When having only ad4 online, then it simply cannot find gm0 at all. (kind of reasonable) Relatively. Is the ad4 recognized by the system? You didn't really clear metadata on ad4 so it should be recognized, but as a stale version (hopefully). If it isn't recognized at all, then it's broken. So my only option is to have only ad6 online, with a current gmirror status: panix# gmirror status NameStatus Components mirror/gm0 COMPLETE ad6 This is ok. Anyone has an idea of how should i proceed (besides buying a UPS unit!) Is it meaningfull to go for a new Disk to replace current ad4? Yes. Then proceed with gmirror insert. Why is the presence of the supposed bad disk ad4, affecting gm0, when having already told gm0 to forget about ad4? It's relatively common (it was more common in the days of PATA cables) to have a bad drive interfering with the rest of the system. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Weird problem with gmirror - cannot add the Good disk when previously failed SATA disk is online
Achilleas Mantzios wrote: Hello, I run 7.1-PRERELEASE, its a home server. today morning after a power failure, the rebuild my root gm0 failed on disk ad4. The messages were: May 18 08:02:02 panix kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=268091264 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: Intel i865G GMCH on vgapci0 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xf000 128MB May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.5.0 20060119 May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: drm0: [ITHREAD] May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: subdisk4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: ad4: detached May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad4 disconnected. May 18 08:02:08 panix kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad4 stopped. I read http://www.eztiger.org/2008/08/removing-and-re-adding-a-disk-in-gmirror/ hoping that the rebuld failure was temprary and so i tried to just run # gmirror forget gm0 # gmirror insert gm0 ad4 The correct order of commands is: atacontrol list gmirror list gmirror forget gm0 gmirror clear -v ad4 gmirror insert -v gm0 ad4 Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird SSH problem... Any ideas?!?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:46:37AM -0500, chris.a.hori...@seagate.com wrote: check permissions on /etc/passwd, in my case, solaris 10, /etc/passwd needed to be world readable. I don't understand your problem. /etc/passwd is always world readable. /etc/master.passwd is not. jerry Chris Horinek Oklahoma City Data Center Seagate Technology LLC chori...@seagate.com 405-324-3599 Conf. Call# (US): (877) 810-9442 Access# 1338666 Conf. Call# (Int'l): (636) 651-3190 Access# 1338666 - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird SSH problem... Any ideas?!?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:33:48PM -0500, chris.a.hori...@seagate.com wrote: in my case, someone had inadvertantly removed world read from /etc/passwd. I added it back and the problem went away. Hmmm. Well, nothing in the system should be changing permissions on /etc/passwd.Was anyone else working on the system who had access to do that? Maybe they didn't realize that passwd has to have world read. jerry Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu No Phone Info Available 04/14/2009 02:20 PM To chris.a.hori...@seagate.com cc freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject Re: Weird SSH problem... Any ideas?!? On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:46:37AM -0500, chris.a.hori...@seagate.com wrote: check permissions on /etc/passwd, in my case, solaris 10, /etc/passwd needed to be world readable. I don't understand your problem. /etc/passwd is always world readable. /etc/master.passwd is not world readable. jerry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird SSH problem... Any ideas?!?
in my case, someone had inadvertantly removed world read from /etc/passwd. I added it back and the problem went away. Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu No Phone Info Available 04/14/2009 02:20 PM To chris.a.hori...@seagate.com cc freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject Re: Weird SSH problem... Any ideas?!? On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:46:37AM -0500, chris.a.hori...@seagate.com wrote: check permissions on /etc/passwd, in my case, solaris 10, /etc/passwd needed to be world readable. I don't understand your problem. /etc/passwd is always world readable. /etc/master.passwd is not. jerry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird permissions on directories when installing ports through sudo
On 02/19/2009 15:56, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: For the longest time, I have installed ports via the sudo make install or sudo portupgrade or sudo portinstall method and never had a problem. This seems to have jumped up and bitten me on the arse as well. I believe the problem lies herein: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/sudo/distinfo?rev=1.61 It appears that sudo has been changed following a security issue. I use a more restrictive umask than the default. I suspect you do as well. The sudo change now implements a union of umasks, therefore never lowering the umask of the person running sudo. This had the effect of truly screwing up many installed ports for me (I do the same as you `sudo portupgrade`). I'm not blaming the fix... just whining about it. The fix for me was to deinstall and reinstall and problem ports using root himself. I suspect though you could fix it other ways by fiddling with your usmask, and/or altering the sudo config files. Recently, as of a few weeks ago, I started noticing that ports that were installed or upgraded were getting the wrong permissions. Not only were directories getting permissions of 700 (whereas previously they had been 755), but the directories /usr/local and entries in /var/db/pkg were getting permissions of 700. This is causing a lot of things to break, and I have to manually go in and make everything public for it to work again. This only happens when I build ports via sudo. If I am root and I run make install, everything works fine. yeah. Me too. :) I haven't changed anything recently either in sudo, or my umask. What can I do to fix this? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Regards, Eric signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: weird permissions on directories when installing ports through sudo
lowering the umask of the person running sudo. This had the effect of truly screwing up many installed ports for me Maybe try sudo -H -u root [command] NetBSD Pkgsrc is nice in this respect because it has sudo(8) integration in the MKs. ~BAS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: weird permissions on directories when installing ports through sudo
On 02/25/2009 11:49, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: lowering the umask of the person running sudo. This had the effect of truly screwing up many installed ports for me Maybe try sudo -H -u root [command] NetBSD Pkgsrc is nice in this respect because it has sudo(8) integration in the MKs. ~BAS I didn't think this would do much, but gave it a try anyway And it doesn't help. :/ The following command prior to the change resulted in root's umask being displayed: sudo -H -u root umask Whereas after the change in sudo I mentioned, the union of mine and root's is presented. I looked at the security issue mentioned in the commit log, and I'm not sure this change was required in order to fix it. Anyone have thoughts on why this change was made? I'd argue POLA was broken here. But I don't keep up with sudo developments (aside from using it). -- Regards, Eric signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: weird permissions on directories when installing ports through sudo
I didn't think this would do much, but gave it a try anyway And it doesn't help. :/ I think i meant '-i' -- but I'd have to look at the patch`s interaction. I can't recreate the problem in the 1.6.x we're running in our internal release engineering. 1.7.x, and its associated backport, created the local brouhaha with groups credential crashing. Perhaps next time a -dev extension of the port should roll for a few months (6-9), especially given the history of sudo releng. ~BAS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Weird problem with firefox
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:17:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 17:49:08 -0600 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: I just uninstalled Firefox v. 2.0.0.20 and then installed firefox v. 3.0.5. Which shows one firefox binary; firefox3. Yet, when I start firefox and click on Help/About, it shows I'm running 2.0.0.20. WTF? Anyone have a sensible explanation for this? Never mind. Rebooting fixed the problem. Rebooting? You shouldn't have had to do that. At most, you might have needed to restart your window manager and/or menu program. If you were starting Firefox from the shell, you probably just needed to enter `rehash` to get it to recognize changes to what's in the execution path. -- Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Sean Reifschneider: If java had real garbage-collection, it would delete most programs before it executed them. pgpMFe0ECq6Yk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Weird problem with firefox
--On Wednesday, February 11, 2009 14:34:07 -0600 Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:17:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 17:49:08 -0600 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: I just uninstalled Firefox v. 2.0.0.20 and then installed firefox v. 3.0.5. Which shows one firefox binary; firefox3. Yet, when I start firefox and click on Help/About, it shows I'm running 2.0.0.20. WTF? Anyone have a sensible explanation for this? Never mind. Rebooting fixed the problem. Rebooting? You shouldn't have had to do that. At most, you might have needed to restart your window manager and/or menu program. If you were starting Firefox from the shell, you probably just needed to enter `rehash` to get it to recognize changes to what's in the execution path. I had to reboot for unrelated reasons. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** Check the headers before clicking on Reply. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird problem with firefox
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 17:49:08 -0600 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: I just uninstalled Firefox v. 2.0.0.20 and then installed firefox v. 3.0.5. Which shows one firefox binary; firefox3. Yet, when I start firefox and click on Help/About, it shows I'm running 2.0.0.20. WTF? Anyone have a sensible explanation for this? Never mind. Rebooting fixed the problem. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** Check the headers before clicking on Reply. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird samba error
Aggelidis Nikos wrote: hi to all the list, i have a question concerning samba and freebsd: whenever i use the option username map = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbusers in my smb.conf , and i try to connect to samba server like this #smbclient //apollo/username Password: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE i get this error even though i type the password correctly... here is the smb.conf i use: $cat /usr/local/etc/smb.conf [global] netbios name = apollo workgroup = PHOME server string = Freebsd File Server dns proxy = No security = user encrypt passwords = yes passdb backend = smbpasswd smb passwd file = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbpasswd #*this options creates all the problems* #username map = /usr/local/etc/samba/smbusers debug timestamp = no log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 hosts allow = 192.168.1., 192.168.2., 127. [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No #cat /usr/local/etc/samba/smbusers # Unix_name = SMB_Name1 SMB_Name2 ... # map_to = map_from root = administrator nobody = guest smbguest pcguest username = username anotherusername any idea why this happens?or how i should investigate it more? thanks in advance -nicolas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I don't have a link, but a friend had similar problems. He searched the list archives and the proposed solution (which worked for him) was username case sensitivity. I think it's the windows side that needs ALL CAPS for the usernames for this mapping to work. Please try that. (and try the opposite if the first doesn't work). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: weird samba error
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Aggelidis Nikos aggelidis.n...@gmail.com wrote: hi to all the list, i forgot to mention that i use almost the same smb.conf and smbusers in a debian lenny and everything works, that's why i prefered to post this message in questi...@... best regards, nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Weird FS behavior tru FTP on CD9660
Sdävtaker wrote: Hey, I found a weird situation today, I mounted a DVD with the mount_cd9660 and accessed it through filezilla. I got 2 times every file in the list, go back to the original Pc and checked with ls and they appear only once. :-/ Im using last version Filezilla in MSW, and ftpd in FBSD7.0r. I think it can be reading both TOCs in the DVD, but it is weird since it doesnt happen when doing ls. Can someone try reproduce it in another setup? You need to test one thing first: use FreeBSD's command-line FTP client (called ftp) and try to access the same files. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Weird FS behavior tru FTP on CD9660
Sdävtaker wrote: Hey, I found a weird situation today, I mounted a DVD with the mount_cd9660 and accessed it through filezilla. I got 2 times every file in the list, go back to the original Pc and checked with ls and they appear only once. :-/ Im using last version Filezilla in MSW, and ftpd in FBSD7.0r. I think it can be reading both TOCs in the DVD, but it is weird since it doesnt happen when doing ls. Can someone try reproduce it in another setup? Sdav I believe this is fixed in RELENG_7. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird GEOM errors
hunter morgan wrote: Hi. ive had a freebsd7 box running zfs on 5 500gb hard drives for months upon months now with mostly good stability but every couple of minutes in my logs i get errors such as: kernel: GEOM: ad2: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. kernel: GEOM: ad2: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. on 2 disks, ad8 and ad2 any ideas why and how to fix? mostly just annoying. thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try searching the mailing list archives, this has been discussed on one of the lists but I forget the answer. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird Processes on my server from user....
In the last episode (Aug 07), Agus said: Hi guys, Checking my server i found this processessThe user doesnt appear doing w..so its like if he was doing an scp or something like that...though in this case its sftp... But i read the man and doesnt have much information..so i dont understand what is going in the background with this proccesess or how can i check it... the user is deamon and is a registered user... here is the pstree output: | |-+= 74888 root sshd: deamon [priv] (sshd) | | \-+- 74891 deamon sshd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (sshd) | | \-+= 74892 deamon csh -c /usr/libexec/sftp-server | | \--- 74893 deamon /usr/libexec/sftp-server I think you'll see this if the user is sftp'ing over SSHv1; the sftp-server component has to be launched via a shell login because SSHv1 doesn't have subsystems. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird
anyone? On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:06 PM, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have something really weird going on... all of the sudden my box went away and came back later on i have daily log rotating, yet my last log shows following: Aug 2 17:15:28 j nrpe[75619]: Handling the connection... Aug 4 09:49:52 j named[63163]: zone gmsworld.com/IN: expired look at the timestamp and never mind what the actual message says.. can anyone explain me what the hell happened? -- http://alexus.org/ -- http://alexus.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
The voltages as the BIOS reports them:
Vcore = 1.258 V
+3.30 V = 3.274V
+5.00 V = 5.121V
+12.00 V = 11.870V
i hope by the end of the day i will be able to test the system with a
1100watt Tagan PSU {a friend just bought a monster pc!}.
I will then run: make buildworld...
-nikos
PS: i can interup the process of builworld without causing any
problems to the system correct?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Aggelidis Nikos wrote:
The voltages as the BIOS reports them:
Vcore = 1.258 V
+3.30 V = 3.274V
+5.00 V = 5.121V
+12.00 V = 11.870V
Not very useful here, since these may change under load I am afraid.
i hope by the end of the day i will be able to test the system with a
1100watt Tagan PSU {a friend just bought a monster pc!}.
Nice, this will help you eliminate one factor.
I will then run: make buildworld...
-nikos
PS: i can interup the process of builworld without causing any
problems to the system correct?
Certainly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Aggelidis Nikos wrote:
Hi to all the list, i 've been using FreeBSD for almost a month ,and i
have this weird problem. Sometimes when i try to compile a program the
computer will hard-reset itself, like someone pulled of the plug...
For example yesterday i was trying to install jdk1.6 + eclipse, and
while i was compiling eclipse {more precisely -if i remember
correctly- the diablo-jdk needed for eclipse} the computer rebooted
itself.
The load of the computer was: 2-3xterms, 1 Konversation irc client
,several opera9.51 windows, 1-2 konqueror windows, and 1-2 Firefox
widows. I have a dual core box with 2GB of memory and i use freebsd7
32bit. The computer was online for 8hours with almost the same load
{minus the compilation-procedure}.
* Has anyone had problems like this?
* What can i do to investigate a bit more what was the situation
before the restart?
* Is there anyway to solve this problem.
thanks for your help,
nikos
PS: i could blame the power company but the above problem has happened
before{several times} when i tried to compile big programs like
firefox or do a pkgdb -Fu, so i don't think it is this.
Hi Nikos,
This sounds like a hardware problem to me. It is not easy to find out
the exact cause, except perhaps by swapping components:
- Could be bad RAM, but I doubt it is you would probably get at least a
kernel panic and not a hard reboot
- Could be that your power supply can not handle the increased current
required by the CPU / disk when compiling, voltages fall out of spec,
and the motherboard resets itself. I've seen this happening quite a few
times - systems exhibit a variety of weird symptoms like this, commonly
failing when running CPU intensive apps.
- Your CPU / system may get overheated and hits a thermal cutoff.
- You could have some other faulty component, or some of your BIOS
settings are too 'high'
Things to try:
- Take the cover off and see whether there is heat build up when
compiling and also whether the fans work adequately.
- Swap out the power supply
- Change some BIOS settings, or maybe underclock the CPU a bit so it
requires less power and see if it works then.
Most of the people here are used to run long compilation / portupgrade
cycles (sometimes in excess of 24 hours) and when a system fails
unexpectedly like this it is normal to suspect hardware problems.
Manolis
P.S. I removed the -hackers list from the reply - this question is
better suited for -questions only.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:09:09 +0300
Aggelidis Nikos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all the list, i 've been using FreeBSD for almost a month ,and i
have this weird problem. Sometimes when i try to compile a program the
computer will hard-reset itself, like someone pulled of the plug...
For example yesterday i was trying to install jdk1.6 + eclipse, and
while i was compiling eclipse {more precisely -if i remember
correctly- the diablo-jdk needed for eclipse} the computer rebooted
itself.
The load of the computer was: 2-3xterms, 1 Konversation irc client
,several opera9.51 windows, 1-2 konqueror windows, and 1-2 Firefox
widows. I have a dual core box with 2GB of memory and i use freebsd7
32bit. The computer was online for 8hours with almost the same load
{minus the compilation-procedure}.
* Has anyone had problems like this?
Yes. It's always turned out to be flaky hardware for me.
* What can i do to investigate a bit more what was the situation
before the restart?
Look through /var/log/messages.
* Is there anyway to solve this problem.
Well, you really can't solve it, so much as troubleshoot it. Make up
a list of possible causes, and then start checking each possible
cause. You haven't given any real information about the system or the
problem, so we can't eliminate anything. My top suspects would be the
PSU (old or inadequate) and CPU (overheating or overclocked). Memory
and the I/O subsystem would be next, but they tend to cause
random process failure rather than system shutdowns when they go
flaky, so I'd try them last.
mike
--
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
O ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Thanks for your answers Manolis and Mike. In the beginning i didn't suspect hardware because it happened only at compilation procedures. Now i realize that every other task i do isn't really demanding. Look through /var/log/messages. i get this: Jul 13 09:00:00 apollo newsyslog[1018]: logfile turned over due to size100K * CPU overheating - Is there anyway to check for cpu temperatures within freebsd? - I 've used the pc for like 8 hours in a really hot day but it didn't restart...if this can be considered as an indication. *Memory - i used memtest ,from an ubuntu live cd, to check the memory and everything works fine according to it. *PSU I have a 400Watt PSU... maybe this is inadequate. I will try to swap it for something stronger to see how it goes. In general where are there any stress tests i can do, to test the PSU and some major subsystems of the computer? thanks in advance, nikos PS: this was a ready-made pc that had it's p4 processor upgraded to a dual core. It also got a new motherboard and 2G of ddr2. It has an old nvidia GeForce fx 5200, and a 400watt nameless PSU. I only have freebsd,which i installed a month ago, on it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Aggelidis Nikos wrote: PS: this was a ready-made pc that had it's p4 processor upgraded to a dual core. It also got a new motherboard and 2G of ddr2. It has an old nvidia GeForce fx 5200, and a 400watt nameless PSU. I only have freebsd,which i installed a month ago, on it. ___ The nameless PSU is probably the cause then. It would work ok with the older CPU but can not keep up with 2cores... I would focus on that, since you already tested memory and the rest of the components seem standard. In ports you will find a few programs for stress testing, e.g.: math/mprime (in torture mode) sysutils/cpuburn (specifically for CPU stress testing) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
-On [20080713 10:04], Aggelidis Nikos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Look through /var/log/messages. i get this: Jul 13 09:00:00 apollo newsyslog[1018]: logfile turned over due to size100K Then look at /var/log/messages.0.bz2 Also, check `last`. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B There is time in life for everything... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Since i can't buy a new PSU today... I kept testing: i tried compile and i got a reboot again: this time i checked /var/log/messages and i have this: ... Jul 13 13:41:20 apollo syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Jul 13 13:41:20 apollo kernel: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: c3a16000 Jul 13 13:41:20 apollo kernel: cpuid = 0 Jul 13 13:41:20 apollo kernel: Uptime: 4h50m11s Jul 13 13:41:20 apollo kernel: Physical memory: 2035 MB Jul 13 13:41:20 apollo kernel: Dumping 218 MB: 203 187 171 155 139 123 107 91 75 59 43 27 11Copyrigh t (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. ... i also installed xmbmon to measure temperatures... i haven't seen anything above 60C so i guess it isn't the BIOS rebooting the computer due to cpu temperature.. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:04:31AM +0300, Aggelidis Nikos wrote: * CPU overheating - Is there anyway to check for cpu temperatures within freebsd? - I 've used the pc for like 8 hours in a really hot day but it didn't restart...if this can be considered as an indication. Not easily. If coretemp(4) is loaded, you should have some sysctls named dev.cpu.X.temperature which contain the temperature of the core in Celcius. Otherwise, you can try utilities like mbmon and healthd, but those were written for old (circa 90s) hardware. Also, are you running powerd(8) on this machine? *Memory - i used memtest ,from an ubuntu live cd, to check the memory and everything works fine according to it. That's a good start; your memory is probably not the issue then. *PSU I have a 400Watt PSU... maybe this is inadequate. I will try to swap it for something stronger to see how it goes. Wattage is not the only thing that matters with a PSU. Voltages are significantly more important, if you ask me. I'd make a list of what your voltages are (go into the BIOS and see) and provide them here. There may be one which is significantly off, indicating a bad PSU. In general where are there any stress tests i can do, to test the PSU and some major subsystems of the computer? Windows offers many free utilities that do this; I'm not sure about FreeBSD. -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Aggelidis Nikos wrote: * CPU overheating - Is there anyway to check for cpu temperatures within freebsd? - I 've used the pc for like 8 hours in a really hot day but it didn't restart...if this can be considered as an indication. You could try sysutils/mbmon or sysutils/xmbmon - shows cpu temperature, inside case temperature and vcore voltage. Supported chipsets are listed in mbmon/pkg-descr. Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
running mprime-torture i get: Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer. Please read stress.txt. Hit ^C to end this test. Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length. Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length. Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length. Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length. FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4 Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file. Torture Test ran 9 minutes - 1 errors, 0 warnings. so maybe it isn't even a psu problem but a cpu one? I'd make a list of what your voltages are (go into the BIOS and see) and provide them here. i will do that. thanks everyone for your assistance so far! -nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Aggelidis Nikos wrote: running mprime-torture i get: Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer. Please read stress.txt. Hit ^C to end this test. Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length. Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length. Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length. Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length. FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4 Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file. Torture Test ran 9 minutes - 1 errors, 0 warnings. so maybe it isn't even a psu problem but a cpu one? Not really. All modern CPUs have BIST (built-in self tests) that run even before the BIOS starts, and it would be really rare to actually have a working system with a faulty CPU. Errors in mprime usually indicate some other problem, such as bad memory, bad BIOS settings, overheating or an incompatibility of CPU/motherboard etc. Going back to what you said previously, you got an Nvidia 5200 graphics card? Were these ever produced for PCI express or are you using a) a normal PCI one or b)You got one of these weird mobos that have both AGP and PCI express? As I understand there are no AGP-only motherboards for core2duo. Another thought: Sometimes the CPU cooler is not entirely seated, resulting in bad thermal contact of the heatsink/CPU assembly. This is not unusual in the 775 socket since the mechanism requires quite some pressure to lock and some people are afraid to apply it ;) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Not really. All modern CPUs have BIST (built-in self tests) that run even before the BIOS starts, and it would be really rare to actually have a working system with a faulty CPU. Errors in mprime usually indicate some other problem, such as bad memory, bad BIOS settings, overheating or an incompatibility of CPU/motherboard etc. Going back to what you said previously, you got an Nvidia 5200 graphics card? Were these ever produced for PCI express or are you using a) a normal PCI one or b)You got one of these weird mobos that have both AGP and PCI express? As I understand there are no AGP-only motherboards for core2duo. Yes i have a weird mobo that has both AGP and PCI. The nvidia is an AGP one. The mobo wasn't my choise :( but when the changed the false cpu with a dual core they didn't want to change the graphics card as well. Can this mobo create problems? Another thought: Sometimes the CPU cooler is not entirely seated, resulting in bad thermal contact of the heatsink/CPU assembly. This is not unusual in the 775 socket since the mechanism requires quite some pressure to lock and some people are afraid to apply it ;) I will check it... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
Aggelidis Nikos wrote: Not really. All modern CPUs have BIST (built-in self tests) that run even before the BIOS starts, and it would be really rare to actually have a working system with a faulty CPU. Errors in mprime usually indicate some other problem, such as bad memory, bad BIOS settings, overheating or an incompatibility of CPU/motherboard etc. Going back to what you said previously, you got an Nvidia 5200 graphics card? Were these ever produced for PCI express or are you using a) a normal PCI one or b)You got one of these weird mobos that have both AGP and PCI express? As I understand there are no AGP-only motherboards for core2duo. Yes i have a weird mobo that has both AGP and PCI. The nvidia is an AGP one. The mobo wasn't my choise :( but when the changed the false cpu with a dual core they didn't want to change the graphics card as well. Can this mobo create problems? It is possible, having both an AGP and PCI express on the same board is a hack, and not even all AGP cards are compatible with these mobos. It would be better to test it with a PCI express graphics card, if you can grab one. I'd be happy to lend you one for testing, but I guess we are not in the same town ;) (Chania here...) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
On Jul 13, 2008, at 4:38 AM, Aggelidis Nikos wrote: FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4 Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file. Torture Test ran 9 minutes - 1 errors, 0 warnings. so maybe it isn't even a psu problem but a cpu one? If it was strictly a problem with the CPU, you'd likely not be able to boot, or this test would fail within a few seconds. 9 minutes is possible but a bit on the early side to be a thermal issue; more likely would be the memory config and BIOS setup is marginal and that relaxing the timings would help. If you shut down for a while, and then do a cold restart with the case open, does that result in the stress test taking longer to fail? If so, check your cooling. On the other hand, if the length of time before failure doesn't change, or more precisely seems random-- 5-10 minutes one try, an hour the next, that generally indicates memory and motherboard BIOS setup. PSU problems tend to not show up with prime95, but when you have the disks busy and maybe graphics, also. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird restarts when compiling
It doesn't look like overheating, unless the thermal compound, heatsink and temperature monitor are not properly set. The only times I had reboots like that was due to a driver with an irq conflict, a driver accessing incorrect memory, or running out of space on a device (trying to write to non-existent address). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird FTP issue???
Hi, did you also use different cable and different switch ports for this problematic machine? Yes, your problem sounds weird. Life told us so many times that things like this can happen. Erich Michaela wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if anyone can possibly explain or give their expertise with this bizarre/weird issue if you will that I've been having while using such commands as portsnap, portaudit, fetch, etc. First off, I'm running FreeBSD v6.1. I have three (Internet) servers running the same FreeBSD version. However, one of the servers has been giving me trouble and I can't decipher whether or not it's a FreeBSD related issue or something else altogether. On this one server, whenever I try to use portaudit, portsnap, fetch, or whenever I try to upgrade ports and it needs to fetch the updates the connections ALMOST always time out. But what's weird is that I don't have the issue on the other two FreeBSD servers when they need to use the same commands. I can SSH to this (problem) server, ping to-from it, and everything else. It's gotten to the point where I thought it was a FreeBSD problem so I completely reformatted and installed the O/S. However, it's STILL doing the same thing. Upon trying to install certain distribution sets through FTP media, I'd get an error about it (FreeBSD) not being able to get a connection with the remote FreeBSD server. After that, I even went as far as changing network cards and it's still doing it. Using netstat while trying to use the commands shows that it's sending a SYN flag to the remote server, but no connection is ever established. I have all three servers plugged into the same router/firewall and have done so for years with no problems. This is the first issue of its kind. I'd greatly appreciate any insight, help, explanation, or something. This is getting really aggrevating. THANK YOU in advance. -- Michael ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird FTP issue???
Michaela wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if anyone can possibly explain or give their expertise with this bizarre/weird issue if you will that I've been having while using such commands as portsnap, portaudit, fetch, etc. First off, I'm running FreeBSD v6.1. I have three (Internet) servers running the same FreeBSD version. However, one of the servers has been giving me trouble and I can't decipher whether or not it's a FreeBSD related issue or something else altogether. On this one server, whenever I try to use portaudit, portsnap, fetch, or whenever I try to upgrade ports and it needs to fetch the updates the connections ALMOST always time out. But what's weird is that I don't have the issue on the other two FreeBSD servers when they need to use the same commands. I can SSH to this (problem) server, ping to-from it, and everything else. It's gotten to the point where I thought it was a FreeBSD problem so I completely reformatted and installed the O/S. However, it's STILL doing the same thing. Upon trying to install certain distribution sets through FTP media, I'd get an error about it (FreeBSD) not being able to get a connection with the remote FreeBSD server. After that, I even went as far as changing network cards and it's still doing it. Using netstat while trying to use the commands shows that it's sending a SYN flag to the remote server, but no connection is ever established. I have all three servers plugged into the same router/firewall and have done so for years with no problems. This is the first issue of its kind. I'd greatly appreciate any insight, help, explanation, or something. This is getting really aggrevating. THANK YOU in advance. -- Michael Hi, Michael! Please, note that portsnap is not using FTP, but HTTP. The first thing to do, when a problem like this occurs, is to use tcpdump to capture a packet trace. Use tcpdump on the server and, if possible, on the router/firewall and show us the results, if you can't analyze them by yourself. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: weird messages in daily security run output mails
Jan L. Nauta schrieb: [...] +NMI 2ISAN MI ISA 38, EIS3A8, E0I +S +A 0 +2N2NMMII I SAIS A 38, E3I8S, AEI S0A NMI ISA 38, EISA 0 kernel trap +19 with interrupts disabled NMI ISA 28, EISA 0 NMI 2INSAM I ISA 28, +EISA2 08 [...] g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s1f[READ(offset=356486479872, length=16384)]error [...] That looks like a hardware error. If you don't already have an assumption I would try to find the broken hardware by testing the hard disks separately, e.g. by reading the entire disk and watching the log: dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=64k and tail -f /var/log/messages. Regards Björn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird perms with linux_base-gentoo-stage3
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:22:31PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: I'm using linux_base-gentoo-stage3-2006.0_2 for my 6.2-RELEASE system's Linux emulation. It works perfectly for my Linux apps - better than the recommend linux_base-fc4 port, in fact - but has a strange problem. Whenever I install just out of curiousity - what do you mean by better then the recommended fc4 ? what problems disappear with you switch to gentoo base? thnx ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird perms with linux_base-gentoo-stage3
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:58:39 +0100, Divacky Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just out of curiousity - what do you mean by better then the recommended fc4 ? what problems disappear with you switch to gentoo base? Well, the short answer is that with the Gentoo base, some of the proprietary applications we use will run, while under FC4, they'd either fail to load or have horrible OpenGL problems (like poor performance or bad displays). I installed the Gentoo base as a test and the programs instantly started working again. It may not be recommended for various reasons that I haven't really researched, but it does what we need. -- Kirk Strauser ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird problem with DRAC 5
--On September 19, 2006 5:25:23 PM -0400 Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Got it. ehci.c v 1.42: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/usb/ehci.c?rev=1.42co ntent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Put this version in place in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb, comment out line 766 and rebuild your kernel and the DRAC5 keyboard will start to work. Thanks, Bill. I just recompiled the kernel, and now the mouse and keyboard work fine. Now if I can just figure out why I can get to the DRAC card from one machine and not from the other... Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Re: Weird problem with DRAC 5
In response to Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm setting up a new server (Dell 1950) that has a DRAC card. My home network (where I'm working on it in my spare time) is behind a wireless router, and the internal network is 192.168.2.0/24. The DRAC card's IP address is 192.168.2.120 (gateway is 192.168.2.1. Mask is 255.255.255.0.) I can access the DRAC card from the server that it's on (through its IP - 192.168.2.120), and I can access it from my Windows workstation that is plugged in to the router just like the DRAC card is (RJ45 cable.) I'm pretty sure the router's interface is switched (not a hub.) I cannot access the DRAC card from my Mac OS X laptop, which is on the wireless network and has an address of 192.168.2.102. When I try to ping the DRAC card from the Mac, I get No route to host. Host is down. If I ping it from the server or from the Windows box, it responds fine. This makes no sense to me. If anyone has a bright ideas what I'm missing, I'm all ears. These sound like network routing problems. One other thing. Using the console redirection through the web interface (which forces you to use IE and an ActiveX control!), I can see the console fine, but the keyboard and mouse (on the Windows box) don't do anything. I can still login through the USB keyboard attached to the server, and I can see the virtualy keyboard and mouse being detected (looking at the console messages.) Has anyone gotten console redirection working (to include keyboard and mouse functionality)? No. It's broken right now. Do a search on the mailing list and you'll see lots of complaints. It works in 7, and I've been trying to figure out what can be MFCed to 6 in order to get it working there. If anyone has any insight, I'd be interested to hear it. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird problem with DRAC 5
--On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 13:54:45 -0400 Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This makes no sense to me. If anyone has a bright ideas what I'm missing, I'm all ears. These sound like network routing problems. Of course, but it makes no sense. All the hosts are having no problems accessing each other or the internet, yet the Mac, which is wireless, can't access the DRAC card. It has no problem accessing the server that the DRAC card is on, and the only difference between the two is the IP address - unless I've mistyped something - but you can imagine I've checked and rechecked everything. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Re: Weird problem with DRAC 5
In response to Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]: One other thing. Using the console redirection through the web interface (which forces you to use IE and an ActiveX control!), I can see the console fine, but the keyboard and mouse (on the Windows box) don't do anything. I can still login through the USB keyboard attached to the server, and I can see the virtualy keyboard and mouse being detected (looking at the console messages.) Has anyone gotten console redirection working (to include keyboard and mouse functionality)? No. It's broken right now. Do a search on the mailing list and you'll see lots of complaints. It works in 7, and I've been trying to figure out what can be MFCed to 6 in order to get it working there. If anyone has any insight, I'd be interested to hear it. Got it. ehci.c v 1.42: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/usb/ehci.c?rev=1.42content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Put this version in place in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb, comment out line 766 and rebuild your kernel and the DRAC5 keyboard will start to work. The commit note says MFC after 2 weeks, but this seems to have been missed. I'm going to ping the maintainers and see if I can get it MFCed before 6.2 comes out. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SV: Re: Weird result of portupgrade -aRr concerning pkgconfig or is it pkg-config?
Thank you for editing my post. Strange that freebsd does not provide any info on how to deal with these problems. I think one is supposed to invoke pkgdb -F when portupgrades fail like this. The question then is how to respond. The most recent page I could find about that is this: http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~reinholz/freebsd/pkgdb_F.html I haven't tried it yet but I suspect I will get some of those same questions when I do. Especieally about stale origin to pkgconfig. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird result of portupgrade -aRr concerning pkgconfig or is it pkg-config?
Bobby, On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Bobby Knight wrote: HelloNewly installed 6.1. I recently said hello to a newly installed FreeBSD 6.1 myself. Barely touched ports so one would expect it to work, That sounds like a reasonable expectation for FreeBSD. I'm new to FreeBSD myself. For the most part I've found it quite stable. I've been a Linux user for years(since the 1.x kernel days) and after only a few days of tinkering with FreeBSD on a test box I'm just about ready to switch my main box over to FreeBSD. yet it fails brutally for me as a new user when I do portupgrade -arR just to upgrade a few packages. I experienced a similar failure to the one you describe, although I didn't find it all that brutal. After a few tries I managed to get past it. I have no clue why and what to do so I am hoping someone here knows. I don't really have a clue as to why myself but I'll tell you what worked for me. There may be a better solution to this and if so hopefully someone with more knowledge than I will point it out. To improve your chances of getting the answers you need you might want to consider paying attention to the guidelines posted occasionally, especially the part about including line breaks. Such a post can be found at: http://Lists.FreeBSD.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-July/126199.html Reformatting your post so I could reply to it took a bit of time. Since I had a similar problem I took the time to reformat your message and reply to it with the hope that it will encourage someone who might not otherwise have repiled to provide more information and a better solution to the problem. Can't see what I have done wrong. My guess is you haven't done anything wrong. I had the same problem. That is always cvsup ports and do a portsdb -Fu; portaudit -Fa before upgrade as well as read UPDATING. I use portsnap myself and just installed portupgrade and portaudit yesterday. I'm still learning all the proper steps necessary to keep my system up to date. Checking if devel/pkg-config already installed === pkg-config-0.20_2 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. I tried a 'make deinstall' then 'make reinstall' as the error message suggested. It didn't help. Then, I tried a 'make deinstall' followed by a 'portupgrade -aRr' which appeared to get around the problem. Portupgrade installed the version of pkg-config it really wanted and upgraded everything successfully. Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org Bruceville, TX Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird result of portupgrade -aRr concerning pkgconfig or is it pkg-config?
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 13:22, Bobby Knight wrote: HelloNewly installed 6.1. Barely touched ports so one would expect it to work, yet it fails brutally for me as a new user when I do portupgrade -arR just to upgrade a few packages.I have no clue why and what to do so I am hoping someone here knows. Can't see what I have done wrong. I have followed the available ports docs/mans slavishly. That is always cvsup ports and do a portsdb -Fu; portaudit -Fa before upgrade as well as read UPDATING.The info I've managed to gather is listed below. I don't want to retry the installation and maybe screw up things more before I ask you guys. Problem seems to be with pkg-config or pkgconfig... pkgconfig puzzles me. There exits no port of this in the tree yet it somehow is a package now. $ grep pkgconfig /usr/ports/MOVED devel/pkgconfig|devel/pkg-config|2006-05-27|Renamed to use real vendor package name You can probably just pkg_delete pkgconfig, and fix-up the dependencies. Between the two you probably need to install the new version. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird result of portupgrade -aRr concerning pkgconfig or is it pkg-config?
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:34:46PM +0100, RW wrote: $ grep pkgconfig /usr/ports/MOVED devel/pkgconfig|devel/pkg-config|2006-05-27|Renamed to use real vendor package name You can probably just pkg_delete pkgconfig, and fix-up the dependencies. Between the two you probably need to install the new version. Would: portupgrade -f -o pkgconfig pkg-config be the correct way to fix such a problem? Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org Bruceville, TX Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird result of portupgrade -aRr concerning pkgconfig or is it pkg-config?
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:00, Kevin Monceaux wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:34:46PM +0100, RW wrote: $ grep pkgconfig /usr/ports/MOVED devel/pkgconfig|devel/pkg-config|2006-05-27|Renamed to use real vendor package name You can probably just pkg_delete pkgconfig, and fix-up the dependencies. Between the two you probably need to install the new version. Would: portupgrade -f -o pkgconfig pkg-config be the correct way to fix such a problem? probably, I don't use portupgrade much myself. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird apache problem
I just tried that page in firefox on a windows and it worked fine. You may have your firefox install foobar, and might want to uninstall and reinstall it. -Derek At 02:14 PM 6/5/2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: I'm having a problem figuring out what the heck is wrong with a webserver. Any suggestions would be welcomed. It's running Apache and php4 (with Apache module selected using make config), and when you try to load a page (Squirrelmail) using Firefox, you get a popup asking you what to do with the file. (You have chosen to open ..which is a: application/x-httpd-php from: https://webmail.stovebolt.com What should Firefox do with this file? The page loads fine in Internet Explorer. The load module and add module lines exist in the httpd.conf file and the webserver has been restarted repeatedly, with no errors. There's no errors in the httpd-error log. The libphp4.so file exists in the correct directory. uname -a FreeBSD stovebolt.stovebolt.com 5.4-SECURITY FreeBSD 5.4-SECURITY httpd -V Server version: Apache/1.3.36 (Unix) Server built: Jun 3 2006 11:20:12 php -v PHP 4.4.2 (cli) (built: Jun 5 2006 13:56:53) Copyright (c) 1997-2006 The PHP Group Zend Engine v1.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2004 Zend Technologies grep php /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so AddModule mod_php4.c IfModule mod_php3.c IfModule mod_php4.c DirectoryIndex index.php index.php3 index.html index.htm IfModule !mod_php4.c DirectoryIndex index.php3 index.html index.htm IfModule !mod_php3.c IfModule mod_php4.c DirectoryIndex index.php index.html index.htm IfModule !mod_php4.c DirectoryIndex index.html index.htm index.php AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps Redirect / https://webmail.stovebolt.com/index.php Files ~ \.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php|php3?|php4?)$ #Files ~ \.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php3?|php4?)$ Files ~ \.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php3?)$ The only thing that strikes me as odd is that there's no dependency for php related to apache: pkg_info -r apache* Information for apache+mod_ssl-1.3.36+2.8.27: Depends on: Dependency: mm-1.4.0 Dependency: expat-2.0.0_1 pkg_info -R apach* Information for apache+mod_ssl-1.3.36+2.8.27: Required by: mod_perl-1.29_1 mod_security-1.9.2 squirrelmail-1.4.6 -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird apache problem
Derek Ragona wrote: I just tried that page in firefox on a windows and it worked fine. You may have your firefox install foobar, and might want to uninstall and reinstall it. Same here. Loads fine on Mac's Firefox. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird apache problem
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: Derek Ragona wrote: I just tried that page in firefox on a windows and it worked fine. You may have your firefox install foobar, and might want to uninstall and reinstall it. Same here. Loads fine on Mac's Firefox. Since nobody's mentioned it yet... The page loads fine on Firefox under FreeBSD. For me. -- Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** [ Busy Expunging | ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird apache problem
Chris Hill wrote: On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: Derek Ragona wrote: I just tried that page in firefox on a windows and it worked fine. You may have your firefox install foobar, and might want to uninstall and reinstall it. Same here. Loads fine on Mac's Firefox. Since nobody's mentioned it yet... The page loads fine on Firefox under FreeBSD. For me. Yeah. It was an ID 10 T problem. :-( I needed to clear the browser cache and history. Thanks for checking, everyone. -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: weird arp issues
Subhi S Hashwa wrote: Jun 3 21:14:58 nile kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 193.19.XXX.1 (!AF_LINK) [ ... ] 21:23:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# netstat -rn|grep 193.19.XXX.1 193.19.XXX.1 193.19.XXX.1 UHLW14lo0 = 193.19.XXX.1/32link#1 UC 00em0 I would gather that you've got the 193.19.XXX.1 IP assigned to lo0 rather than to a real interface, only you can't ARP over the loopback. Don't do that, leave lo0 assigned to 127.0.0.1 ::1 if using IPv6. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird / FS behavior
On May 4, 2006, at 10:30 , Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat S56/vcs/20060504/*.vcs S56/vcs/20060504/cal.vcs /: write failed, filesystem is full cat: stdout: No space left on device The shell expands the * after creating the output file for the redirection, so one of the files being concatenated into cal.vcs is cal.vcs. (This has always been true for all shells, in my experience.) -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird / FS behavior
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:30:23PM -0400, Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat S56/vcs/20060504/*.vcs S56/vcs/20060504/cal.vcs What is wrong with this picture: echo foo a cat a a :-) Kris pgpuayAlZFmFU.pgp Description: PGP signature
