Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

2004-01-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:29:51AM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
 Hello all,
 
Maybe this is not the best list to post this question,
 but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source
 for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the
 policy for 5.1 package-feeding, since the upgrade process has
 been described as very unstable at the present time.

What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding?

Kris


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

2004-01-23 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Kris Kennaway wrote:
What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding?
I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software?
For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to
compile the whole thing.
Should I consider upgrading to 5.2 for that matter?
--
Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

2004-01-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:02:30PM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
 Kris Kennaway wrote:
 What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding?
 
 I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software?
 For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to
 compile the whole thing.
 Should I consider upgrading to 5.2 for that matter?

Packages for releases are not updated.  See
http://www.freebsd.org/ports for more information.

Kris


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature