On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:57:51 -0400, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:19:08 +0300
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr articulated:
You can always install bash with pkg_add. The default package is
not built as a static binary, but you can compile a static
On Jun 06 2010 22:00, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:32:58AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I was a tcsh user before switching to zsh. But I was raised on the
Bourne Shell, and used Korn shell a lot in the 90s. The C-shell versions
of control flow commands always tripped me
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:06:07 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:06:28AM -1000, p...@pair.com wrote:
I cannot say about the tcsh features.
That's kind of a shame, since tcsh is what I prefer these days, having
long since given up on bash (pretty much
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:26:04PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:06:07 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
I've never really tried using vi-mode editing in any shell, despite the
fact I'm a constant vi user (even a vi gangsta, one might say). Maybe I
should
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:31:05AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I'd also like to publicly thank you on this list for encouraging me to
try FreeBSD. I absolutely love it.
I consider it a service to mankind to encourage more people using better,
and better-licensed, software. You're welcome, and
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:35:09 +, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com
wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but
i found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
It isn't humanly
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:19:08 +0300
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr articulated:
You can always install bash with pkg_add. The default package is
not built as a static binary, but you can compile a static bash
binary from its port:
# cd /usr/ports/shells/bash
# make
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good ideas
from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be copyfree rather than copyleft.
Do you use that as your interactive shell, for scripting, or both?
man zsh to
On Jun 06 2010 10:31, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good ideas
from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be copyfree rather than copyleft.
Do you use that as your interactive
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:50:43AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
On Jun 06 2010 10:31, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good ideas
from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be
On Jun 06 2010 12:21, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:50:43AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
On Jun 06 2010 10:31, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good
ideas
in message 20100606182148.gb28...@guilt.hydra,
wrote Chad Perrin thusly...
...
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of
the good ideas from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be
copyfree rather than
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:32:58AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I was a tcsh user before switching to zsh. But I was raised on the
Bourne Shell, and used Korn shell a lot in the 90s. The C-shell versions
of control flow commands always tripped me up, even though they're
arguably more sane --
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:06:28AM -1000, p...@pair.com wrote:
I cannot say about the tcsh features.
That's kind of a shame, since tcsh is what I prefer these days, having
long since given up on bash (pretty much immediately after I started
using FreeBSD as my primary OS instead of bash, and
On Jun 05 2010 22:35, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
thanks in advance
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
Too broad a topic I suspect
On Sat 05 Jun 2010 at 16:24:36 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences
17 matches
Mail list logo
